[1. Mencke T, Echternach M, Plinkert PK, Johann U, Afan N, Rensing H, et al. Does the timing of tracheal intubation based on neuromuscular monitoring decrease laryngeal injury? A randomized, prospective, controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 306-312. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000181290.37527.CE]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Naguib M, Kopman AF, Lien CA, Hunter JM, Lopez A, Brull SJ. A survey of current management of neuromuscular block in the United States and Europe. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 110-119. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c07428]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Brull SJ, Kopman AF. Current Status of Neuromuscular Reversal and Monitoring: Challenges and Opportunities. Anesthesiology 2017; 126: 173-190. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001409]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Thomsen JL, Nielsen CV, Palmqvist DF, Gätke MR. Premature awakening and underuse of neuromuscular monitoring in a registry of patients with butyrylcholinesterase deficiency. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115 (Suppl 1): i89-i94. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev103]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Phillips S, Stewart PA, Bilgin AB. A survey of the management of neuromuscular blockade monitoring in Australia and New Zealand. Anaesth Intensive Care 2013; 41: 374-37910.1177/0310057X130410031623659401]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Kopman AF, Yee PS, Neuman GG. Relationship of the train-offour fade ratio to clinical signs and symptoms of residual paralysis in awake volunteers. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 765-77110.1097/00000542-199704000-000059105219]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[7. Brull SJ, Naguib M. What we know: precise measurement leads to patient comfort and safety. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 918-920. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318234367d]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Naguib M, Kopman AF, Ensor JE. Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarisation: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98: 302-316. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael386]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Checketts MR, Alladi R, Ferguson K, Gemmell L, Handy JM, Klein AA, et al. Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2015: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 85-93. doi: 10.1111/anae.13316]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Fortier LP, McKeen D, Turner K, de Médicis É, Warriner B, Jones PM, et al. The RECITE study: A Canadian Prospective, Multicenter Study of the Incidence and Severity of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade. Anesth Analg 2015; 121: 366-372. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000757]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Aytac I, Postaci A, Aytac B, Sacan O, Alay GH, Celik B, et al. Survey of postoperative residual curarization, acute respiratory events and approach of anesthesiologists. Braz J Anesthesiol 2016; 66: 55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2012.06.011]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Unterbuchner C, Blobner M, Pühringer F, Janda M, Bischoff S, Bein B, et al. Development of an algorithm using clinical tests to avoid post-operative residual neuromuscular block. BMC Anesthesiol 2017; 17: 101. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0393-4]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Cammu G, De Witte J, De Veylder J, Byttebier G, Vandeput D, Foubert L, et al. Postoperative residual paralysis in outpatients versus inpatients. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 426-429. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000195543.61123.1f]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Pavlin EG, Holle RH, Schoene RB. Recovery of airway protection compared with ventilation in humans after paralysis with curare. Anesthesiology 1989; 70: 381-385. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198903000-00002]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Pedersen T, Viby-Mogensen J, Bang U, Olsen NV, Jensen E, Engbæk J. Does perioperative tactile evaluation of the trainof- four response influence the frequency of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade? Anesthesiology 1990; 73: 835-839. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199011000-00007]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Rodney G, Raju PK, Ball DR. Not just monitoring; a strategy for managing neuromuscular blockade. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 1105-1109. doi: 10.1111/anae.13219]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Bhananker SM, Treggiari MM, Sellers BA, Cain KC, Ramaiah R, Thilen SR. Comparison of train-of-four count by anesthesia providers versus TOF-Watch® SX: a prospective cohort study. Can J Anaesth 2015; 62: 1089-1096. doi: 10.1007/s12630- 015-0433-9]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Capron F, Fortier LP, Racine S, Donati F. Tactile fade detection with hand or wrist stimulation using train-of-four, double-burst stimulation, 50-hertz tetanus, 100-hertz tetanus, and acceleromyography. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 1578-1584. doi: 10.1213/ 01.ane.0000204288.24395.38]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Brull SJ, Silverman DG. Visual and tactile assessment of neuromuscular fade. Anesth Analg 1993; 77: 352-355. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199377020-00024]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Drenck NE, Ueda N, Olsen NV, Engbćk J, Jensen E, Skovgaard LT, et al. Manual evaluation of residual curarization using double burst stimulation: a comparison with train-of-four. Anesthesiology 1989; 70: 578-581. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198904000-00003]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Murphy GS. Neuromuscular Monitoring in the Perioperative Period. Anesth Analg 2018; 126: 464-468. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002387]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Naguib M, Brull SJ, Johnson KB. Conceptual and technical insights into the basis of neuromuscular monitoring. Anaesthesia 2017; 72 Suppl 1: 16-37. doi: 10.1111/anae.13738]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Engbæk J, Roed J, Hangaard N, Viby-Mogensen J. The agreement between adductor pollicis mechanomyogram and first dorsal interosseous electromyogram. A pharmacodynamic study of rocuronium and vecuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994; 38: 869-878. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1994.tb04020.x]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Brull SJ, Murphy GS. Residual Neuromuscular Block: lessons unlearned. Part II: methods to reduce the risk of residual weakness. Anesth Analg 2010; 111:129-140. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da8312]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Hemmerling TM, Schmidt J, Hanusa C, Wolf T, Schmitt H. Simultaneous determination of neuromuscular block at the larynx, diaphragm, adductor pollicis, orbicularis oculi and corrugator supercilii muscles. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 856-860. doi: 10.1093/bja/85.6.856]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Claudius C, Viby-Mogensen J. Acceleromyography for use in scientific and clinical practice: a systematic review of the evidence. Anesthesiology 2008; 108: 1117-1140. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318173f62f]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Liang SS, Stewart PA, Phillips S. An ipsilateral comparison of acceleromyography and electromyography during recovery from nondepolarizing neuromuscular block under general anesthesia in humans. Anesth Analg 2013; 117: 373-379. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182937fc4]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Suzuki T, Fukano N, Kitajima O, Saeki S, Ogawa S. Normalization of acceleromyographic train-of-four ratio by baseline value for detecting residual neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96: 44-47. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei273]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Colegrave N, Billard V, Motamed C, Bourgain JL. Comparison of the TOF-Scan™ acceleromyograph to TOF-Watch SX™: Influence of calibration. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2016; 35: 223-227. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2016.01.003]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Trager G, Michaud G, Deschamps S, Hemmerling TM. Comparison of phonomyography, kinemyography and mechanomyography for neuromuscular monitoring. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53(2): 130-135. doi: 10.1007/BF03021816]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Schepens T, Cammu G. Neuromuscular blockade: what was, is and will be. Acta Anesthesiol Belg 2014; 65: 151-159]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Veiga Ruiz G, García Cayuela J, Orozco Montes J, Parreño Caparrós M, García Rojo B, Aguayo Albasini JL. Monitoring intraoperative neuromuscular blockade and blood pressure with one device (TOF-Cuff): A comparative study with mechanomyography and invasive blood pressure. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2017; 64: 560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2017.03.013]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Brull SJ, Ross Renew J, Naguib M. Monitoring neuromuscular blockade. UpToDate [Internet]. 2017 Nov 27 [cited 2018 March 11]. Available from Uptodate.com: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/monitoring-neuromuscular-blockade]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Ungureanu D, Meistelman C, Frossard J, Donati F. The orbicularis oculi and the adductor pollicis muscles as monitors of atracuriurn block of laryngeal muscles. Anesth Analg 1993; 77(4): 775-779. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199310000-00021]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Thilen SR, Hansen BE, Ramaiah R, Kent CD, Treggiari MM, Bhananker SM. Intraoperative neuromuscular monitoring site and residual paralysis. Anesthesiology 2012; 117: 964-972. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31826f8fdd]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Fabregat López J, Candia Arana CA, Castillo Monzón CG. Neuromuscular monitoring and its importance in neuromuscular blockade. Rev Colomb Anestesiol 2012; 40: 293-303. doi: 10.1016/j.rca.2012.05.001]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F. The corrugator supercilii, not the orbicularis oculi, reflects rocuronium neuromuscular blockade at the laryngeal adductor muscles. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 96-101. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200107000-00019]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Hemmerling TM, Le N. Brief review: Neuromuscular monitoring: an update for the clinician. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 58-72. doi: 10.1007/BF03021901]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Saitoh Y, Fujii Y, Takahashi K, Makita K, Tanaka H, Amaha K. Recovery of post-tetanic count and train-of-four responses at the great toe and thumb. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 244-248. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00336.x]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Ali HH, Wilson RS, Savarese JJ, Kitz RJ. The effect of tubocurarine on indirectly elicited train-of-four muscle response and respiratory measurements in humans. Br J Anaesth 1975; 47: 570-574. doi:10.1093/bja/47.5.570]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Sauer M, Stahn A, Soltesz S, Noeldge-Schomburg G, Mencke T. The influence of residual neuromuscular block on the incidence of critical respiratory events. A randomised, prospective, placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28: 842-848. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328345cd11]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J; 8th International Neuromuscular Meeting. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamics studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: The Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51: 789-808. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01352.x]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Jones RK, Caldwell JE, Brull SJ, Soto RG. Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 816-824. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818a3fee]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Caldwell JE, Robertson EN, Baird WL. Antagonism of profound neuromuscular blockade induced by vecuronium or atracurium. Comparison of neostigmine with edrophonium. Br J Anaesth 1986; 58: 1285-1289. doi: 10.1093/bja/58.11.1285]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Kirkegaard H, Heier T, Caldwell JE. Efficacy of tactile-guided reversal from cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 45-50. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199809170-00011]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Kim KS, Cheong MA, Lee HJ, Lee JM. Tactile assessment for the reversibility of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade during propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 1080-1085. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130616.57678.80]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Fuchs-Buder T, Meistelman C, Alla F, Grandjean A, Wuthrich Y, Donati F. Antagonism of low degrees of atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade: dose-effect relationship for neostigmine. Anesthesiology 2010; 112: 34-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c53863]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Schaller SJ, Fink H, Ulm K, Blobner M. Sugammadex and neostigmine dose-finding study for reversal of shallow residual neuromuscular block. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 1054-1060. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f4182a]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Hoffmann U, Grosse-Sundrup M, Eikermann-Haerter K, Zaremba S, Ayata C, Zhang B, et al. A new agent to reverse the effects of benzylisoquinoline and steroidal neuromuscular-blocking agents. Anesthesiology 2013; 119: 317-325. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182910213]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Haerter F, Simons JC, Foerster U, Moreno Duarte I, Diaz-Gil D, Ganapati S, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Calabadion and Sugammadex to Reverse Non-depolarizing Neuromuscularblocking Agents. Anesthesiology 2015; 123: 1337-1349. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000868]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Indications of neuromuscular blockade in anaesthesia. Short text. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2000; 19(Suppl 2): 352s-355s]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Cerny V, Herold I, Cvachovec K, Sevcik P, Adamus M. Guidelines for managing neuromuscular block: not only Czech beer deserves a taste. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 482. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fff10b]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA); Professional documents [Internet]. Melbourne: Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. 2015. [cited 2018 February 12]. Available from: http://www.anzca.edu.au/resources/professional-documents.]Search in Google Scholar
[54. The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain & Ireland (AAGBI); Guidelines [Internet]. London, UK: The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain & Ireland. 2015. [cited 2018 February 9] Available from: https://www.aagbi.org/publications/publications-guidelines/S/Z]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Popat M, Mitchell V, Dravid R, Patel A, Swampillai C, Higgs A.Difficult Airway Society Guidelines for the management of tracheal extubation. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 318-340. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07075.x]Search in Google Scholar
[56. American Society of Anesthesiologists; Standards and Guidelines and Related Resources [Internet]. Schaumburg, IL: American Society of Anesthesiologists. 2016. [cited 2018 February 9] Available from: http://www.asahq.org/quality-and-practicemanagement/standards-guidelines-and-related-resources/standards-for-basic-anesthetic-monitoring]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Apfelbaum JL, Silverstein JH, Chung FF, Connis RT, Fillmore RB, et al. Practice guidelines for postanesthetic care: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Postanesthetic Care. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 291-307. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827773e9]Search in Google Scholar