Neuromuscular monitoring: an update

1. Mencke T, Echternach M, Plinkert PK, Johann U, Afan N, Rensing H, et al. Does the timing of tracheal intubation based on neuromuscular monitoring decrease laryngeal injury? A randomized, prospective, controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 306-312. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000181290.37527.CESearch in Google Scholar

2. Naguib M, Kopman AF, Lien CA, Hunter JM, Lopez A, Brull SJ. A survey of current management of neuromuscular block in the United States and Europe. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 110-119. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c07428Search in Google Scholar

3. Brull SJ, Kopman AF. Current Status of Neuromuscular Reversal and Monitoring: Challenges and Opportunities. Anesthesiology 2017; 126: 173-190. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001409Search in Google Scholar

4. Thomsen JL, Nielsen CV, Palmqvist DF, Gätke MR. Premature awakening and underuse of neuromuscular monitoring in a registry of patients with butyrylcholinesterase deficiency. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115 (Suppl 1): i89-i94. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev103Search in Google Scholar

5. Phillips S, Stewart PA, Bilgin AB. A survey of the management of neuromuscular blockade monitoring in Australia and New Zealand. Anaesth Intensive Care 2013; 41: 374-37910.1177/0310057X130410031623659401Search in Google Scholar

6. Kopman AF, Yee PS, Neuman GG. Relationship of the train-offour fade ratio to clinical signs and symptoms of residual paralysis in awake volunteers. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 765-77110.1097/00000542-199704000-000059105219Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Brull SJ, Naguib M. What we know: precise measurement leads to patient comfort and safety. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 918-920. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318234367dSearch in Google Scholar

8. Naguib M, Kopman AF, Ensor JE. Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarisation: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98: 302-316. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael386Search in Google Scholar

9. Checketts MR, Alladi R, Ferguson K, Gemmell L, Handy JM, Klein AA, et al. Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2015: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 85-93. doi: 10.1111/anae.13316Search in Google Scholar

10. Fortier LP, McKeen D, Turner K, de Médicis É, Warriner B, Jones PM, et al. The RECITE study: A Canadian Prospective, Multicenter Study of the Incidence and Severity of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade. Anesth Analg 2015; 121: 366-372. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000757Search in Google Scholar

11. Aytac I, Postaci A, Aytac B, Sacan O, Alay GH, Celik B, et al. Survey of postoperative residual curarization, acute respiratory events and approach of anesthesiologists. Braz J Anesthesiol 2016; 66: 55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2012.06.011Search in Google Scholar

12. Unterbuchner C, Blobner M, Pühringer F, Janda M, Bischoff S, Bein B, et al. Development of an algorithm using clinical tests to avoid post-operative residual neuromuscular block. BMC Anesthesiol 2017; 17: 101. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0393-4Search in Google Scholar

13. Cammu G, De Witte J, De Veylder J, Byttebier G, Vandeput D, Foubert L, et al. Postoperative residual paralysis in outpatients versus inpatients. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 426-429. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000195543.61123.1fSearch in Google Scholar

14. Pavlin EG, Holle RH, Schoene RB. Recovery of airway protection compared with ventilation in humans after paralysis with curare. Anesthesiology 1989; 70: 381-385. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198903000-00002Search in Google Scholar

15. Pedersen T, Viby-Mogensen J, Bang U, Olsen NV, Jensen E, Engbæk J. Does perioperative tactile evaluation of the trainof- four response influence the frequency of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade? Anesthesiology 1990; 73: 835-839. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199011000-00007Search in Google Scholar

16. Rodney G, Raju PK, Ball DR. Not just monitoring; a strategy for managing neuromuscular blockade. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 1105-1109. doi: 10.1111/anae.13219Search in Google Scholar

17. Bhananker SM, Treggiari MM, Sellers BA, Cain KC, Ramaiah R, Thilen SR. Comparison of train-of-four count by anesthesia providers versus TOF-Watch® SX: a prospective cohort study. Can J Anaesth 2015; 62: 1089-1096. doi: 10.1007/s12630- 015-0433-9Search in Google Scholar

18. Capron F, Fortier LP, Racine S, Donati F. Tactile fade detection with hand or wrist stimulation using train-of-four, double-burst stimulation, 50-hertz tetanus, 100-hertz tetanus, and acceleromyography. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 1578-1584. doi: 10.1213/ 01.ane.0000204288.24395.38Search in Google Scholar

19. Brull SJ, Silverman DG. Visual and tactile assessment of neuromuscular fade. Anesth Analg 1993; 77: 352-355. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199377020-00024Search in Google Scholar

20. Drenck NE, Ueda N, Olsen NV, Engbćk J, Jensen E, Skovgaard LT, et al. Manual evaluation of residual curarization using double burst stimulation: a comparison with train-of-four. Anesthesiology 1989; 70: 578-581. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198904000-00003Search in Google Scholar

21. Murphy GS. Neuromuscular Monitoring in the Perioperative Period. Anesth Analg 2018; 126: 464-468. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002387Search in Google Scholar

22. Naguib M, Brull SJ, Johnson KB. Conceptual and technical insights into the basis of neuromuscular monitoring. Anaesthesia 2017; 72 Suppl 1: 16-37. doi: 10.1111/anae.13738Search in Google Scholar

23. Engbæk J, Roed J, Hangaard N, Viby-Mogensen J. The agreement between adductor pollicis mechanomyogram and first dorsal interosseous electromyogram. A pharmacodynamic study of rocuronium and vecuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994; 38: 869-878. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1994.tb04020.xSearch in Google Scholar

24. Brull SJ, Murphy GS. Residual Neuromuscular Block: lessons unlearned. Part II: methods to reduce the risk of residual weakness. Anesth Analg 2010; 111:129-140. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da8312Search in Google Scholar

25. Hemmerling TM, Schmidt J, Hanusa C, Wolf T, Schmitt H. Simultaneous determination of neuromuscular block at the larynx, diaphragm, adductor pollicis, orbicularis oculi and corrugator supercilii muscles. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 856-860. doi: 10.1093/bja/85.6.856Search in Google Scholar

26. Claudius C, Viby-Mogensen J. Acceleromyography for use in scientific and clinical practice: a systematic review of the evidence. Anesthesiology 2008; 108: 1117-1140. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318173f62fSearch in Google Scholar

27. Liang SS, Stewart PA, Phillips S. An ipsilateral comparison of acceleromyography and electromyography during recovery from nondepolarizing neuromuscular block under general anesthesia in humans. Anesth Analg 2013; 117: 373-379. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182937fc4Search in Google Scholar

28. Suzuki T, Fukano N, Kitajima O, Saeki S, Ogawa S. Normalization of acceleromyographic train-of-four ratio by baseline value for detecting residual neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96: 44-47. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei273Search in Google Scholar

29. Colegrave N, Billard V, Motamed C, Bourgain JL. Comparison of the TOF-Scan™ acceleromyograph to TOF-Watch SX™: Influence of calibration. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2016; 35: 223-227. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2016.01.003Search in Google Scholar

30. Trager G, Michaud G, Deschamps S, Hemmerling TM. Comparison of phonomyography, kinemyography and mechanomyography for neuromuscular monitoring. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53(2): 130-135. doi: 10.1007/BF03021816Search in Google Scholar

31. Schepens T, Cammu G. Neuromuscular blockade: what was, is and will be. Acta Anesthesiol Belg 2014; 65: 151-159Search in Google Scholar

32. Veiga Ruiz G, García Cayuela J, Orozco Montes J, Parreño Caparrós M, García Rojo B, Aguayo Albasini JL. Monitoring intraoperative neuromuscular blockade and blood pressure with one device (TOF-Cuff): A comparative study with mechanomyography and invasive blood pressure. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2017; 64: 560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2017.03.013Search in Google Scholar

33. Brull SJ, Ross Renew J, Naguib M. Monitoring neuromuscular blockade. UpToDate [Internet]. 2017 Nov 27 [cited 2018 March 11]. Available from Uptodate.com: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/monitoring-neuromuscular-blockadeSearch in Google Scholar

34. Ungureanu D, Meistelman C, Frossard J, Donati F. The orbicularis oculi and the adductor pollicis muscles as monitors of atracuriurn block of laryngeal muscles. Anesth Analg 1993; 77(4): 775-779. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199310000-00021Search in Google Scholar

35. Thilen SR, Hansen BE, Ramaiah R, Kent CD, Treggiari MM, Bhananker SM. Intraoperative neuromuscular monitoring site and residual paralysis. Anesthesiology 2012; 117: 964-972. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31826f8fddSearch in Google Scholar

36. Fabregat López J, Candia Arana CA, Castillo Monzón CG. Neuromuscular monitoring and its importance in neuromuscular blockade. Rev Colomb Anestesiol 2012; 40: 293-303. doi: 10.1016/j.rca.2012.05.001Search in Google Scholar

37. Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F. The corrugator supercilii, not the orbicularis oculi, reflects rocuronium neuromuscular blockade at the laryngeal adductor muscles. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 96-101. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200107000-00019Search in Google Scholar

38. Hemmerling TM, Le N. Brief review: Neuromuscular monitoring: an update for the clinician. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 58-72. doi: 10.1007/BF03021901Search in Google Scholar

39. Saitoh Y, Fujii Y, Takahashi K, Makita K, Tanaka H, Amaha K. Recovery of post-tetanic count and train-of-four responses at the great toe and thumb. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 244-248. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00336.xSearch in Google Scholar

40. Ali HH, Wilson RS, Savarese JJ, Kitz RJ. The effect of tubocurarine on indirectly elicited train-of-four muscle response and respiratory measurements in humans. Br J Anaesth 1975; 47: 570-574. doi:10.1093/bja/47.5.570Search in Google Scholar

41. Sauer M, Stahn A, Soltesz S, Noeldge-Schomburg G, Mencke T. The influence of residual neuromuscular block on the incidence of critical respiratory events. A randomised, prospective, placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28: 842-848. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328345cd11Search in Google Scholar

42. Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J; 8th International Neuromuscular Meeting. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamics studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: The Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51: 789-808. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01352.xSearch in Google Scholar

43. Jones RK, Caldwell JE, Brull SJ, Soto RG. Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 816-824. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818a3feeSearch in Google Scholar

44. Caldwell JE, Robertson EN, Baird WL. Antagonism of profound neuromuscular blockade induced by vecuronium or atracurium. Comparison of neostigmine with edrophonium. Br J Anaesth 1986; 58: 1285-1289. doi: 10.1093/bja/58.11.1285Search in Google Scholar

45. Kirkegaard H, Heier T, Caldwell JE. Efficacy of tactile-guided reversal from cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 45-50. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199809170-00011Search in Google Scholar

46. Kim KS, Cheong MA, Lee HJ, Lee JM. Tactile assessment for the reversibility of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade during propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 1080-1085. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130616.57678.80Search in Google Scholar

47. Fuchs-Buder T, Meistelman C, Alla F, Grandjean A, Wuthrich Y, Donati F. Antagonism of low degrees of atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade: dose-effect relationship for neostigmine. Anesthesiology 2010; 112: 34-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c53863Search in Google Scholar

48. Schaller SJ, Fink H, Ulm K, Blobner M. Sugammadex and neostigmine dose-finding study for reversal of shallow residual neuromuscular block. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 1054-1060. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f4182aSearch in Google Scholar

49. Hoffmann U, Grosse-Sundrup M, Eikermann-Haerter K, Zaremba S, Ayata C, Zhang B, et al. A new agent to reverse the effects of benzylisoquinoline and steroidal neuromuscular-blocking agents. Anesthesiology 2013; 119: 317-325. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182910213Search in Google Scholar

50. Haerter F, Simons JC, Foerster U, Moreno Duarte I, Diaz-Gil D, Ganapati S, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Calabadion and Sugammadex to Reverse Non-depolarizing Neuromuscularblocking Agents. Anesthesiology 2015; 123: 1337-1349. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000868Search in Google Scholar

51. Indications of neuromuscular blockade in anaesthesia. Short text. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2000; 19(Suppl 2): 352s-355sSearch in Google Scholar

52. Cerny V, Herold I, Cvachovec K, Sevcik P, Adamus M. Guidelines for managing neuromuscular block: not only Czech beer deserves a taste. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 482. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fff10bSearch in Google Scholar

53. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA); Professional documents [Internet]. Melbourne: Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. 2015. [cited 2018 February 12]. Available from: http://www.anzca.edu.au/resources/professional-documents.Search in Google Scholar

54. The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain & Ireland (AAGBI); Guidelines [Internet]. London, UK: The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain & Ireland. 2015. [cited 2018 February 9] Available from: https://www.aagbi.org/publications/publications-guidelines/S/ZSearch in Google Scholar

55. Popat M, Mitchell V, Dravid R, Patel A, Swampillai C, Higgs A.Difficult Airway Society Guidelines for the management of tracheal extubation. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 318-340. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07075.xSearch in Google Scholar

56. American Society of Anesthesiologists; Standards and Guidelines and Related Resources [Internet]. Schaumburg, IL: American Society of Anesthesiologists. 2016. [cited 2018 February 9] Available from: http://www.asahq.org/quality-and-practicemanagement/standards-guidelines-and-related-resources/standards-for-basic-anesthetic-monitoringSearch in Google Scholar

57. Apfelbaum JL, Silverstein JH, Chung FF, Connis RT, Fillmore RB, et al. Practice guidelines for postanesthetic care: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Postanesthetic Care. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 291-307. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827773e9Search in Google Scholar