Acceso abierto

The Effect of Silver Nanoparticles on Listeria monocytogenes PCM2191 Peptidoglycan Metabolism and Cell Permeability


Cite

Fig. 1.

Effect of AgNPs on L. monocytogenes growth (A) and survival (B).Solid lines – control; dashed lines – 0.25 MIC AgNPs; dotted lines – 0.5 MIC AgNPs. Mean ± SD values of triplicate cultures were shown.
Effect of AgNPs on L. monocytogenes growth (A) and survival (B).Solid lines – control; dashed lines – 0.25 MIC AgNPs; dotted lines – 0.5 MIC AgNPs. Mean ± SD values of triplicate cultures were shown.

Fig. 2.

Influence of AgNPs on lysozyme- or Triton X-100-induced autolysis/lysis of L. monocytogenes.White bar – control, buffer only; dark grey bar – lysozyme or Triton X-100; light grey bar – lysozyme or Triton X-100 + 0.25 MIC AgNPs; black bar – lysozyme or Triton X-100 + 0.5 MIC AgNPs. The results are mean of three independent experiments with every measurement done in triplicate ± SD. Statistically relevant differences (p < 0.05) were marked with asterisks.
Influence of AgNPs on lysozyme- or Triton X-100-induced autolysis/lysis of L. monocytogenes.White bar – control, buffer only; dark grey bar – lysozyme or Triton X-100; light grey bar – lysozyme or Triton X-100 + 0.25 MIC AgNPs; black bar – lysozyme or Triton X-100 + 0.5 MIC AgNPs. The results are mean of three independent experiments with every measurement done in triplicate ± SD. Statistically relevant differences (p < 0.05) were marked with asterisks.

Fig. 3.

Autolysis of isolated L. monocytogenes peptidoglycan in the presence of AgNPs.Absorbance A600 at time 0 was considered as 100%. Solid line – control; dashed line – 0.25 MIC AgNPs; dotted line – 0.5 MIC AgNPs. The results are mean of three independent experiments with every measurement done in triplicate ± SD. Statistically relevant difference (p < 0.05) was marked with an asterisk.
Autolysis of isolated L. monocytogenes peptidoglycan in the presence of AgNPs.Absorbance A600 at time 0 was considered as 100%. Solid line – control; dashed line – 0.25 MIC AgNPs; dotted line – 0.5 MIC AgNPs. The results are mean of three independent experiments with every measurement done in triplicate ± SD. Statistically relevant difference (p < 0.05) was marked with an asterisk.

Fig. 4.

Effect of AgNPs influence on the efflux of DNA and proteins from L. monocytogenes.White bars – control, no AgNPs added; dark grey bars – 0.25 MIC AgNPs; light grey bars – 0.5 MIC AgNPs; black bars – 100 μg/ml lysozyme (positive control). The results are mean of three independent experiments with every measurement done in triplicate ± SD. Statistically relevant difference (p < 0.05) were marked with asterisks.
Effect of AgNPs influence on the efflux of DNA and proteins from L. monocytogenes.White bars – control, no AgNPs added; dark grey bars – 0.25 MIC AgNPs; light grey bars – 0.5 MIC AgNPs; black bars – 100 μg/ml lysozyme (positive control). The results are mean of three independent experiments with every measurement done in triplicate ± SD. Statistically relevant difference (p < 0.05) were marked with asterisks.

Increase in cF efflux from L. monocytogenes caused by AgNPs.

AgNPs concentration% efflux of cF at time (min)
010
0 (negative control)72 ± 279 ± 1
0.25 MIC73 ± 284 ± 2
0.5 MIC74 ± 293* ± 2
eISSN:
2544-4646
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
4 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Life Sciences, Microbiology and Virology