Knowledge, attitude and practice of health care providers toward prescribing factor replacement at federally funded haemophilia treatment centres in the United States
17 oct 2020
Acerca de este artículo
Categoría del artículo: Clinical Practice
Publicado en línea: 17 oct 2020
Páginas: 121 - 128
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17225/jhp00165
Palabras clave
© 2020 M. Bloomberg et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Participant demographic information
Female | 70 | 59.3% |
Male | 26 | 22.0% |
Missing data | 22 | 18.7% |
Hematologist | 43 | 36.6% |
Staff nurse | 4 | 3.4% |
Advanced practice registered nurse (NP) | 19 | 16.1% |
Physician assistant | 1 | 0.8% |
Nurse coordinator | 30 | 25.4% |
Missing data | 21 | 17.8% |
ADN | 2 | 3.8% |
BSN | 22 | 41.5% |
MSN | 21 | 39.6% |
Doctorate (PhD, DNP, EdD) | 4 | 7.5% |
Other | 4 | 7.5% |
Paediatric | 43 | 36.4% |
Adults | 19 | 16.1% |
Both | 34 | 28.8% |
Missing data | 22 | 18.6% |
New England | 11 | 9.3% |
Mid-Atlantic | 11 | 9.3% |
Southeast | 18 | 15.3% |
Great Lakes | 20 | 16.9% |
Northern States | 2 | 1.7% |
Great Plains | 17 | 14.4% |
Mountain States | 8 | 6.8% |
Western States | 10 | 8.5% |
Academic centre | 70 | 59.3% |
Private clinic or hospital | 15 | 12.7% |
Community/public clinic or hospital | 11 | 9.3% |
Independent, self-standing HTC | 10 | 8.5% |
Missing data | 12 | 10.2% |
Perceptions of patient motivation leading to a request to change prescribed factor concentrate
Less frequent dosing option | 0 (0) | 2 (2.4) | 0 (0) | 32 (38.1) | 50 (59.5) |
Lower out-of-pocked cost | 5 (5.9) | 8 (9.4) | 11 (12.9) | 21 (24.7) | 40 (47.1) |
Insurance preferred drug list | 13 (15.5) | 14 (16.7) | 18 (21.4) | 19 (22.6) | 20 (23.8) |
Concerns about inhibitor development | 2 (2.4) | 15 (17.6) | 12 (14.1) | 30 (35.3) | 26 (30.6) |
Strong commitment of manufacturer to haemophilia community | 11 (12.9) | 17 (20.0) | 24 (28.2) | 26 (30.6) | 7 (8.2) |
Patient/caregiver brand loyalty | 4 (4.7) | 7 (8.2) | 11 (12.9) | 41 (48.2) | 22 (25.9) |
Therapy recommended by friend/family | 4 (4.8) | 10 (11.9) | 13 (15.5) | 45 (53.6) | 12 (14.3) |
Therapy recommended by pharmaceutical representative | 9 (10.6) | 19 (22.4) | 21 (24.7) | 28 (32.9) | 8 (9.4) |
Poor response to current therapy (breakthrough bleeds) | 0 (0) | 3 (3.5) | 9 (10.6) | 27 (31.8) | 46 (54.1) |
Factor characteristics (volume to be infused, mixing device, vial sizes) | 1 (1.2) | 3 (3.5) | 7 (8.2) | 46 (54.1) | 28 (32.9) |
Patient/family's relationship with a pharmaceutical representative | 11 (12.9) | 12 (14.1) | 14 (16.5) | 29 (34.1) | 19 (22.4) |
Recommendation by specialty pharmacy | 17 (20.0) | 13 (15.3) | 16 (18.8) | 30 (35.5) | 9 (10.6) |
Attendance to an industry sponsored dinner | 17 (20.0) | 9 (10.6) | 24 (28.2) | 23 (27.1) | 12 (14.1) |
Other | 1 (25.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (25.0) | 1 (25.0) | 1 (25.0) |
Driving forces for changing a patient's factor concentrate
Less frequent dosing option | 0 (0) | 6 (7.1) | 4 (4.8) | 41 (48.8) | 33 (39.3) |
Lower out-of-pocked cost | 5 (5.9) | 8 (9.4) | 14 (16.5) | 34 (40.0) | 24 (28.2) |
Insurance preferred drug list | 10 (11.9) | 11 (13.1) | 19 (22.6) | 30 (35.7) | 14 (16.7) |
Concerns about inhibitor development | 3 (3.5) | 6 (10.6) | 11 (23.5) | 27 (55.3) | 38 (44.7) |
Strong commitment of manufacturer to haemophilia community | 34 (40.5) | 14 (57.1) | 26 (88.1) | 6 (7.1) | 4 (4.8) |
Patient/caregiver brand loyalty | 15 (17.9) | 15 (17.9) | 29 (34.5) | 18 (21.4) | 7 (8.3) |
Patient/caregiver requested a switch in product | 0 (0) | 5 (6.0) | 8 (9.6) | 38 (45.8) | 32 (38.6) |
Therapy recommended by friend/family/acquaintance | 30 (35.7) | 18 (21.4) | 25 (29.8) | 11 (13.1) | 0 (0) |
Poor response to current therapy (breakthrough bleeds) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.2) | 12 (14.1) | 72 (84.7) |
Inadequate PK studies | 0 (0) | 4 (4.8) | 12 (14.3) | 27 (32.1) | 41 (48.8) |
Non-adherent to current therapy | 1 (1.2) | 0 (0) | 4 (47.1) | 40 (47.1) | 40 (47.1) |
Other | 1 (12.5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (25.0) | 5 (62.5) |