Effects of changing retention time on efficiency of submerged MBR treating different types of grey water

[1] Oh, Kai Siang et al. 2018. “A Review of Greywater Recycling Related Issues: Challenges and Future Prospects in Malaysia.” Journal of Cleaner Production 171: 17-29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652617322710 (February 7, 2018).10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.267Search in Google Scholar

[2] Boddu, Veera M. et al. 2016. “Gray Water Recycle: Effect of Pretreatment Technologies on Low Pressure Reverse Osmosis Treatment.” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 4(4): 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.09.031.10.1016/j.jece.2016.09.031Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3] Eriksson, Eva, Karina Auffarth, Mogens Henze, and Anna Ledin. 2002. “Characteristics of Grey Wastewater.” Urban Water 4(1): 85-104.10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00064-4Search in Google Scholar

[4] Li, Fangyue, Knut Wichmann, and Ralf Otterpohl. 2009. “Review of the Technological Approaches for Grey Water Treatment and Reuses.” Science of the Total Environment, The 407(11): 3439-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.02.004.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.02.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[5] Matos, Cristina, Ana Sampaio, and Isabel Bentes. 2007. Greywater Use in Irrigation : Characteristics , Advantages and Concerns.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Burrows, W.D., Schmidt, M.O., Carnevale, R.M., Schaub, S.A., 1991. Nonpotable Reuse: Development of Health Criteria and Technologies for Shower Water Recycle. Water Sci. Technol. 24, 81 LP-88.10.2166/wst.1991.0237Search in Google Scholar

[7] Butler, D., Friedler, E., Gatt, K., 1995. Characterising the quantity and quality of domestic wastewater inflows. Water Sci. Technol. 31, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1223(95)00318-H10.1016/0273-1223(95)00318-Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] Casanova, L.M., Gerba, C.P., Karpiscak, M., 2001. Chemical and microbial characterization of household graywater. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Subst. Environ. Eng. 36, 395-401. https://doi.org/10.1081/ESE-10010347110.1081/ESE-100103471Search in Google Scholar

[9] Racek, J., 2016. Methodology of use greywater in the slected objects. Brno University of Tehcnology.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Le Clech, Pierre, Bruce Jefferson, In Soung Chang, and Simon J. Judd. 2003. “Critical Flux Determination by the Flux-Step Method in a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor.” Journal of Membrane Science 227(1-2): 81-93. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376738803004241 (April 18, 2018).10.1016/j.memsci.2003.07.021Search in Google Scholar

[11] Ghanizadeh, G., Sarrafpour, R., 2001. The Effects of Temperature and PH on Settlability of Activated Sludge Flocs. Iran. J. Public Heath 30, 139-142.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Dyan, M.O., Putra, G.P., Sumardiono, S., Djoko, T., 2015. The effect of pH and operation mode for COD removal of slaughterhouse wastewater with Anaerobic Batch Reactor. Waste Technol. 3, 7-13.10.12777/wastech.3.1.7-13Search in Google Scholar

[13] Ebrahimi, A., Najafpour, G., Mohammadi, M., Babak, H., 2010. Biological treatment of whey in an UASFF bioreactor followed a three-stage RBC. Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. - CHEM IND CHEM ENG Q 16, 175-182. https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ100315025E10.2298/CICEQ100315025Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14] Kuma, R., 2011. Study of Municipal Landfill Leachate : Recycling and Treatment Using UASBR with post treatment by Constructed Wetland Rajesh Kumar Taneja. Indian Institute of Technology Delhi.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Isma, M.I.A., Idris, A., Omar, R., Razreena, A.R.P., 2014. Effects of SRT and HRT on Treatment Performance of MBR and Membrane Fouling 8, 488-492.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Ahmad, M., Khan, Z., Jamal, S., Masoom, M., Aamir, E., 2013. Role of HRT in Biological Treatment of Combined Industrial and Municipal Wastewater. Int. J. Curr. Eng. Technol. 3, 766-774. https://doi.org/ISSN 2277 - 4106Search in Google Scholar