[Bates, Ed, The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From Its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights, OUP Oxford, 201010.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207992.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Chapman, Audrey R., A Human Rights Perspective on Intellectual Property, Scientific Progress, and Access to the Benefits of Science, WIPO Publication No.762(I), Geneva, 1999]Search in Google Scholar
[Coban, Ali Riza, Protection of Property Rights within the European Convention of Human Rights, Ashgate Publishing, 2004]Search in Google Scholar
[Cullet, Philippe, Human Rights and Intellectual Property Protection in the TRIPS Era, The John Hopkins University Press, Human Rights Quarterly, Volume 29, No.2, 200710.1353/hrq.2007.0014]Search in Google Scholar
[Griffits, Johnatan and McDough, Luke, Constructing European Intellectual Property, Achievements and New Perspectives, Edvard Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham & Edvard Elgar Publishing Inc, Northampton, 2013]Search in Google Scholar
[Grgic, Aida, Mataga, Zvonimir, Longar, Matija and Vilfan, Ana, The Right to Property under the European Convention on Human Rights A Guide to the Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and Its Protocols, Council of Europe, 2007]Search in Google Scholar
[Helfer, Laurence R., The New Innovation Frontier? Intellectual Property and the European Court of Human Rights, Harvard International Law Journal, Volume 49, 2008]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Neill, Johnathan, Property Rights and the American Founding: An Overview, Supreme Court Historical Society, Volume 38, Issue 3, 201310.1111/j.1540-5818.2013.12021.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Rathbone, Mark, The Human Rights Act: a Magna Carta for the Twenty-First Century?, Political Studies Association, 2014]Search in Google Scholar
[Renucci, Jean-François, Introduction to the European Convention on Human Rights The rights guaranteed and the protection mechanism, Council of Europe, 2005]Search in Google Scholar
[Santos, Ana Eduarda, Reballancing Intellectual Property in the Information Society: The Human Rights Approach, Duke Law School, 2013]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidtz, David, The Institution of Property, Social Philosophy and Policy, No.11, 199410.1017/S0265052500004428]Search in Google Scholar
[Siegan, Bernard H., Property Rights: From Magna Carta to the Fourteenth Amendment, Transaction Publishers, 2001]Search in Google Scholar
[Спировски, Игор, Јуриспруденцијата на Европскиот суд за човекови права (збирка на пресуди), 2-ри Август С, Штип, 2007]Search in Google Scholar
[Welkowitz, David S., Privatizing Human Rights? Creating Intellectual Property Rights from Human Rights Principles, New York University, Volume 43, No.3, Article 3, 2013]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilson, Tim, Property Rights are Human Rights, IPA Review, Volume 67, No.I, Article 2, 2015]Search in Google Scholar
[Magna Carta, Runnymede, 15.6.1215]Search in Google Scholar
[Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocols No.11 and No.14, Rome, 4.11.1950]Search in Google Scholar
[Cases of the European Commission of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights:]Search in Google Scholar
[Akkus v. Turkey, July 9, 1997, Reports 1997-IV]Search in Google Scholar
[Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal, App.No.73049/01, 44 Eur. H.R. Rep. 42 [846], 855-56 (Chamber 2007) (judgement of Oct. 11, 2005)]Search in Google Scholar
[Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal, App.No.73049/01, 45 Eur. H.R. Rep. 36 [830], (Grand Chamber 2007)]Search in Google Scholar
[Aral v. Turkey, App.No.24563/94 (1998) (admissibility decision)]Search in Google Scholar
[Dima v. Romania, App.No.58472/00, para 87 (2005) (admissibility decision)]Search in Google Scholar
[Draon v. France, App.No.1513/13, 42 Eur.H.R. Rep.40 [807], 832-33 (2006) (judgement of Oct.6, 2005)]Search in Google Scholar
[Fedorenko v. Ukraine, App.No.25921/02, 29 (2006)]Search in Google Scholar
[Forrer-Niedenthal v. Germany, February 20, 2003, App.No. 46316/99]Search in Google Scholar
[Jahn v. Germany, App.No.46720/99, 42 Eur.H.R.Rep.49 [1085], 1105 (Grand Chamber 2006) (judgement of June 30, 2005)]Search in Google Scholar
[Lenzing AG v. United Kingdom, App.No.38817/97, 94-A Eur. Comm’ H.R. Dec.&Rep.136 (1998)]Search in Google Scholar
[Melnychuk v. Ukraine, App.No.28743, para.8 (2005) (admissibility decision)]Search in Google Scholar
[Motais de Narbonne v. France, July 2, 2002, App.No. 48161/99]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith Kline & French Lab. Ltd v. Netherlands, App.No.12633/87, 66 Eur. Comm’ H.R. Dec.&Rep. 70, 79 (1990) (admissibility decision)]Search in Google Scholar
[Sporrong and Lonnroth v. Sweden, September 23, 1982, A 52, § 63]Search in Google Scholar
[Tre Traktorer AB v. Sweden, July 7, 1989, A 159, § 53]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Marle and Others v. the Netherlands, June 26, 1986, A 10110.1007/978-1-4612-4830-9_24]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiggins v. the United Kingdom, EC, February 8, 1978, DR 13/40]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhigalev v. Russia, App.No.54891/00, 131 (2006)]Search in Google Scholar
[Zubani v. Italy, August 7,1996, Reports 1996-IV]Search in Google Scholar