Right To Property: From Magna Carta To The European Convention On Human Rights

Bates, Ed, The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From Its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights, OUP Oxford, 201010.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207992.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Chapman, Audrey R., A Human Rights Perspective on Intellectual Property, Scientific Progress, and Access to the Benefits of Science, WIPO Publication No.762(I), Geneva, 1999Search in Google Scholar

Coban, Ali Riza, Protection of Property Rights within the European Convention of Human Rights, Ashgate Publishing, 2004Search in Google Scholar

Cullet, Philippe, Human Rights and Intellectual Property Protection in the TRIPS Era, The John Hopkins University Press, Human Rights Quarterly, Volume 29, No.2, 200710.1353/hrq.2007.0014Search in Google Scholar

Griffits, Johnatan and McDough, Luke, Constructing European Intellectual Property, Achievements and New Perspectives, Edvard Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham & Edvard Elgar Publishing Inc, Northampton, 2013Search in Google Scholar

Grgic, Aida, Mataga, Zvonimir, Longar, Matija and Vilfan, Ana, The Right to Property under the European Convention on Human Rights A Guide to the Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and Its Protocols, Council of Europe, 2007Search in Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R., The New Innovation Frontier? Intellectual Property and the European Court of Human Rights, Harvard International Law Journal, Volume 49, 2008Search in Google Scholar

O’Neill, Johnathan, Property Rights and the American Founding: An Overview, Supreme Court Historical Society, Volume 38, Issue 3, 201310.1111/j.1540-5818.2013.12021.xSearch in Google Scholar

Rathbone, Mark, The Human Rights Act: a Magna Carta for the Twenty-First Century?, Political Studies Association, 2014Search in Google Scholar

Renucci, Jean-François, Introduction to the European Convention on Human Rights The rights guaranteed and the protection mechanism, Council of Europe, 2005Search in Google Scholar

Santos, Ana Eduarda, Reballancing Intellectual Property in the Information Society: The Human Rights Approach, Duke Law School, 2013Search in Google Scholar

Schmidtz, David, The Institution of Property, Social Philosophy and Policy, No.11, 199410.1017/S0265052500004428Search in Google Scholar

Siegan, Bernard H., Property Rights: From Magna Carta to the Fourteenth Amendment, Transaction Publishers, 2001Search in Google Scholar

Спировски, Игор, Јуриспруденцијата на Европскиот суд за човекови права (збирка на пресуди), 2-ри Август С, Штип, 2007Search in Google Scholar

Welkowitz, David S., Privatizing Human Rights? Creating Intellectual Property Rights from Human Rights Principles, New York University, Volume 43, No.3, Article 3, 2013Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Tim, Property Rights are Human Rights, IPA Review, Volume 67, No.I, Article 2, 2015Search in Google Scholar

Magna Carta, Runnymede, 15.6.1215Search in Google Scholar

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocols No.11 and No.14, Rome, 4.11.1950Search in Google Scholar

Cases of the European Commission of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights:Search in Google Scholar

Akkus v. Turkey, July 9, 1997, Reports 1997-IVSearch in Google Scholar

Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal, App.No.73049/01, 44 Eur. H.R. Rep. 42 [846], 855-56 (Chamber 2007) (judgement of Oct. 11, 2005)Search in Google Scholar

Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal, App.No.73049/01, 45 Eur. H.R. Rep. 36 [830], (Grand Chamber 2007)Search in Google Scholar

Aral v. Turkey, App.No.24563/94 (1998) (admissibility decision)Search in Google Scholar

Dima v. Romania, App.No.58472/00, para 87 (2005) (admissibility decision)Search in Google Scholar

Draon v. France, App.No.1513/13, 42 Eur.H.R. Rep.40 [807], 832-33 (2006) (judgement of Oct.6, 2005)Search in Google Scholar

Fedorenko v. Ukraine, App.No.25921/02, 29 (2006)Search in Google Scholar

Forrer-Niedenthal v. Germany, February 20, 2003, App.No. 46316/99Search in Google Scholar

Jahn v. Germany, App.No.46720/99, 42 Eur.H.R.Rep.49 [1085], 1105 (Grand Chamber 2006) (judgement of June 30, 2005)Search in Google Scholar

Lenzing AG v. United Kingdom, App.No.38817/97, 94-A Eur. Comm’ H.R. Dec.&Rep.136 (1998)Search in Google Scholar

Melnychuk v. Ukraine, App.No.28743, para.8 (2005) (admissibility decision)Search in Google Scholar

Motais de Narbonne v. France, July 2, 2002, App.No. 48161/99Search in Google Scholar

Smith Kline & French Lab. Ltd v. Netherlands, App.No.12633/87, 66 Eur. Comm’ H.R. Dec.&Rep. 70, 79 (1990) (admissibility decision)Search in Google Scholar

Sporrong and Lonnroth v. Sweden, September 23, 1982, A 52, § 63Search in Google Scholar

Tre Traktorer AB v. Sweden, July 7, 1989, A 159, § 53Search in Google Scholar

Van Marle and Others v. the Netherlands, June 26, 1986, A 10110.1007/978-1-4612-4830-9_24Search in Google Scholar

Wiggins v. the United Kingdom, EC, February 8, 1978, DR 13/40Search in Google Scholar

Zhigalev v. Russia, App.No.54891/00, 131 (2006)Search in Google Scholar

Zubani v. Italy, August 7,1996, Reports 1996-IVSearch in Google Scholar