Phytoplankton dynamics in relation to physicochemical conditions in large, stratified Lake Charzykowskie (Northern Poland)
y
27 sept 2017
Acerca de este artículo
Categoría del artículo: Original research paper
Publicado en línea: 27 sept 2017
Páginas: 260 - 270
Recibido: 13 nov 2016
Aceptado: 29 dic 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ohs-2017-0028
Palabras clave
© 2017 Faculty of Oceanography and Geography, University of Gdańsk, Poland. All rights reserved
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Selected physicochemical parameters of water in Lake Charzykowskie in 2014-2015
parameter | 2014 | 2015 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mean | range | ±SD | mean | range | ±SD | |
Secchi depth (m) | 2.8 | 1.9-5.5 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 1.7-4.1 | 0.7 |
Dissolved oxygen (mg l-1) | 8.3 | 4.8-10.6 | 2.1 | 9.3 | 7.5-11.4 | 1.2 |
Water temperature (°C) | 20.0 | 15.4-25.0 | 3.6 | 18.4 | 15.0-21.3 | 2.7 |
pH | 8.0 | 6.7-8.5 | 0.6 | 7.9 | 6.8-8.5 | 0.6 |
Electrolytic conductivity (µS cm-1) | 329 | 317-348 | 9.3 | 332 | 302-357 | 14.9 |
Chlorophyll |
25.41 | 2.27-78.32 | 21.80 | 12.44 | 2.9-21.31 | 5.26 |
TP (mg l-1) | 0.101 | 0.015-0.300 | 0.10 | 0.149 | 0.045-0.496 | 0.12 |
TN (mg l-1) | 3.45 | 1.65-5.25 | 1.2 | 3.49 | 0.33-8.73 | 2.07 |
Statistically significant values of Pearson correlation between environmental parameters and phytoplankton biomass (p≤0_05, bold p≤ 0_001)
WT | SD | EC | pH | DO | N-NH4 | N-NO2 | N-NO3 | TN | P-PO4 | Chl |
Dino | Eugl | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SD | -0.5113 | ||||||||||||
EC | 0.4992 | ||||||||||||
pH | -0.5742 | ||||||||||||
DO | 0.5258 | ||||||||||||
N-NH4 | -0.4101 | ||||||||||||
N-NO2 | 0.5213 | ||||||||||||
N-NO3 | -0.4384 | -0.5323 | |||||||||||
TN | -0.4358 | ||||||||||||
P-PO, | 0.3837 | ||||||||||||
Chl |
0.4079 | 0.5159 | |||||||||||
Cyano | -0.5017 | 0.3930 | -0.5295 | -0.5646 | 0.3757 | ||||||||
Crypto | 1-0.4153 | ||||||||||||
Dino | -0.4801 | 0.4615 | |||||||||||
Eugl | 0.4925 | ||||||||||||
Chryso | 0.5305 | ||||||||||||
Bacill | -0.3932 | ||||||||||||
Chloro | 0.5316 | ||||||||||||
B phyto | -0.3842 | 0.4268 | 0.4338 |
Structural changes in phytoplankton of Lake Charzykowskie in 1947-2015
Date of studies Authors | Chl |
Biomass (µg l-1) | Dominants and subdominants | Strategy | FGs | Traits of phytoplankton | Trophic status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1947 |
0.72 | R |
P |
diatomaceous and cyanobacterial | β-mesotrophy | ||
1954-1955 |
4.5-73.5 | ?eutrophy | |||||
1968 |
2.44 | R | P | cyanobacterial and diatomaceous | eutrophy | ||
1976 |
1.26 | S | LM | cyanobacterial bloom | eutrophy | ||
1987-1990 |
1.33-90.8 | 0.5-43.4 | R |
P |
diatomaceous and cyanobacterial bloom | hypertrophy | |
1999 |
4.2-28.3 | 0.06-10.4 | R |
P |
diatoms, dinoflagellates, cyanobacteria | eutrophy | |
2004 |
8.3-49.4 | 1.8-107.4 | R |
C |
diatoms, dinoflagellates, cyanobacteria | hypertrophy | |
2008 |
1.1-11.0 | C |
C |
diatoms and dinoflagellates | meso-eutrophy | ||
2009 |
3.3-7.6 | C |
X2 |
cryptophytes, cryptophytes, dinoflagellates | meso-eutrophy | ||
2014 |
2.27-78.32 | 0.3-37.82 | C |
C |
diatoms and dinoflagellates | meso-eutrophy | |
2015 (Wiśniewska & Dembowska this article) | 2.9-21.31 | 0.5-11.3 | C |
X2 |
cryptophytes, cyanobacteria, dinoflagellates | meso-eutrophy |
Main functional groups in Lake Charzykowskie and representative species in each group (after Reynolds et al_ 2002; Padisák et al_ 2009) FG Representative species
FG | Representative species | Physiological characteristics |
---|---|---|
B | Mixed, mesotrophic small- and medium-sized lakes, sensitive to the onset of stratification, adapted to low light, sensitive to pH increase, Si depletion, stratification | |
C | Mixed, eutrophic small- and medium-sized lakes with species sensitive to the onset of stratification, sensitive to Si depletion | |
o | Eutrophic epilimnia, tolerant of carbon dioxide depletion, more eutrophic waters, sensitive to Si depletion, stratification | |
LM | Summer epilimnia in eutrophic lakes, low light and very low C tolerant, sensitive to mixing and poor stratification | |
H2 | Oligo-mesotrophic, deep, stratified lakes, with good light conditions, tolerant to low nitrogen, sensitive to mixing, poor light | |
HI | Eutrophic, both stratified and shallow lakes with low nitrogen and low carbon, sensitive to mixing, poor light and low phosphorus | |
X2 | Shallow, clear, mixed layers in meso-eutrophic lakes, tolerance to stratification, sensitive to mixing and filter-feeding grazers, reduced grazing leads to high relative biomass | |
G | Nutrient-rich conditions in stagnant water columns, small eutrophic lakes and very stable phases in larger river-fed basins and storage reservoirs | |
K (L)? |