[1. Abril M., Campo M.M., Önenę A., Saňudo C., Alberti P., Negueruela A.I.: Beef colour evolution as a function of ultimate pH. Meat Sci 2000, 58, 69–78.10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00133-9]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Coombes S.V., Gardner G.E., Pethick D.W., McGilchrist P.: The impact of beef cattle temperament assessed using flight speed on muscle glycogen, muscle lactate and plasma lactate concentrations at slaughter. Meat Sci 2014, 98, 815–821.10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.029]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Cross H.R., West R.L., Dutson T.R.: Comparison of methods for measuring sarcomere length in beef semitendinosus muscle. Meat Sci 1981, 5, 261–266.10.1016/0309-1740(81)90016-4]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Díaz M.T., Vieira C., Pérez C., Lauzurica S., González de Chávarri E., Sánchez M., De la Fuente J.: Effect of lairage time (0 h, 3 h, 6 h or 12 h) on glycogen content and meat quality parameters in suckling lambs. Meat Sci 2014, 96, 653–660.10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.10.013]Search in Google Scholar
[5. England E.M., Matarneh S.K., Oliver E.M., Apaoblaza A., Scheffler T.L., Gerrard D.E.: Excess glycogen does not resolve high ultimate pH of oxidative muscle. Meat Sci 2015, 114, 95–102.10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.10.010]Search in Google Scholar
[6. England E.M., Matarneh S.K., Scheffler T.L., Wachet C., Gerrard D.E.: pH inactivation of phosphofructokinase arrests postmortem glycolysis. Meat Sci 2014, 98, 850–857.10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.07.019]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Fernandez X., Lefaucheur L., Candek M.: Comparative study of two classifications of muscle fibres: consequences for the photometric determination of glycogen according to fibre type in red and white muscle of pig. Meat Sci 1995, 41, 225–235.10.1016/0309-1740(94)00059-G]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Hambrecht E., Eissen J.J., Newman D.J., Smits C.H.M., Verstegen M.W.A., den Hartog L.A.: Preslaughter handling effects on pork quality and glycolytic potential in two muscles differing in fiber type composition. J Anim Sci 2005, 83, 900–907.10.2527/2005.834900x]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Huff-Lonergan E., Baas T.J., Malek M., Dekkers J.C.M., Prusa K., Rothschild M.F.: Correlations among selected pork quality traits. J Anim Sci 2002, 80, 617–627.10.2527/2002.803617x]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Immonen K., Puolanne E.: Variation of residual glycogenglucose concentration at ultimate pH values below 5.75. Meat Sci 2000, 55, 279–283.10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00152-7]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Immonen K., Ruusunen M., Puolanne E.: Some effects of residual glycogen concentration on the physical and sensory quality of normal pH beef. Meat Sci 2000, 55, 33–38.10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00122-9]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Kyla-Puhju M., Ruusunen M., Puolanne E.: Activity of porcine muscle glycogen debranching enzyme in relation to pH and temperature. Meat Sci 2005, 69, 143–149.10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.06.016]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Lee N., Sharma V., Singh R., Mohan A.: Effects of injection enhancement carrageenan, sea-salt, and potassium lactate on beef longissimus lumborum muscle sensorial characteristics and color stability. J Food Process Technol 2014, 5, 1–9.10.4172/2157-7110.1000400]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Maltin C., Balcerzak D., Tilley R., Delday M.: Determinants of meat quality: tenderness. P Nutr Soc 2003, 62, 337–347.10.1079/PNS2003248]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Młynek K., Janiuk I., Dzido A.: Effect of growth intensity of bulls on the microstructure of musculus longissimus lumborum and meat quality. Acta Vet Brno 2012, 81, 127–131.10.2754/avb201281020127]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Moczkowska M., Półtorak A., Wierzbicka A.: Impact of the ageing process on the intensity of post mortem proteolysis and tenderness of beef from crossbreeds. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2015, 59, 361–367.10.1515/bvip-2015-0054]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Monin G., Sellier P.: Pork of low technological quality with a normal rate of muscle pH fall in the immediate post-mortem period: the case of the Hampshire breed. Meat Sci 1985, 13, 49–63.10.1016/S0309-1740(85)80004-8]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Mortimer S.I., van der Werf J.H.J., Jacob R.H., Hopkins D.L., Pannier L., Pearce K.L., Gardner G.E., Warner R.D., Geesink G.H., Hocking Edwards J.E., Ponnampalami E.N., Ball A.J., Gilmour A.R., Pethick D.W.: Genetic parameters for meat quality traits of Australian lamb meat. Meat Sci 2014, 96, 1016–1024.10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.09.00724084607]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Półtorak A., Wyrwisz J., Moczkowska M., Marcinkowska-Lesiak M., Stelmasiak A., Rafalska U., Wierzbicka A., Da-Wen Sun.: Microwave heating of bovine gluteus medius muscle: impact on selected physical properties of final product and cooking yield. Int J Food Sci Technol 2014, 50, 958–965.10.1111/ijfs.12729]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Przybylski W., Monin G., Koćwin-Podsiadła M., Krzęcio E.: Glycogen metabolism in muscle and its effects on meat quality in pigs – a mini review. Pol J Food Nutr Sci 2006, 3, 257–262.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Pӧso A.R., Puolanne E.: Carbohydrate metabolism in meat animals. Meat Sci 2005, 70, 423–434.10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.12.01722063742]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Ryu Y.C., Kim B.C.: Comparison of histochemical characteristics in various pork groups categorized by postmortem metabolic rate and pork quality. J Anim Sci 2006, 84, 894–901.10.2527/2006.844894x]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Scheffler T.L., Gerrard D.E.: Mechanisms controlling pork quality development: The biochemistry controlling postmortem energy metabolism. Meat Sci 2007, 77, 7–16.10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.04.024]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Šimek J., Vorlova L., Malota L., Steinhauserova I., Steinhauser L.: Post-mortal changes of pH value and lactic acid content in the muscles of pigs and bulls. Czech J Anim Sci 2003, 48, 295–299.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Strydom P.E., Frylinck L., Montgomery J.L., Smith M.F.: The comparison of three β-agonists for growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of feedlot cattle. Meat Sci 2009, 81, 557–564.10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.10.011]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Vestergaard M., Therkildsen M., Henckel P., Jensen L.R., Andersen H.R., Sejrsen K.: Influence of feeding intensity, grazing and finishing feeding on meat and eating quality of young bulls and the relationship between muscle fibre characteristics, fibre fragmentation and meat tenderness. Meat Sci 2000, 54, 187–195.10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00098-4]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Wegner J., Albrecht E., Fiedler I., Teuscher F., Papstein H.J., Ender K.: Growth- and breed-related changes of muscle fiber characteristics in cattle. J Anim Sci 2000, 78, 1485–1496.10.2527/2000.7861485x]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Young O.A., West J., Hart A.L., van Otterdijk F.F.H.: A method for early determination of meat ultimate pH. Meat Sci 2004, 66, 493–498.10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00140-2]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Żelechowska E., Przybylski W., Jaworska D., Sante-Lhoutellier V.: Technological and sensory pork quality in relation to muscle and drip loss protein profiles. Eur Food Res Technol 2012, 234, 883–894.10.1007/s00217-012-1705-z]Search in Google Scholar