Diagnostic performance of renal ultrasonography in detecting chronic kidney disease of various severity

[1]Hill NR, Fatoba ST, Oke JL, Hirst JA, O’Callaghan CA, Lasserson DS, Richard Hobbs FD. Global prevalence of chronic kidney disease—a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016; 11:e0158765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158765HillNRFatobaSTOkeJLHirstJAO’CallaghanCALassersonDSRichard HobbsFDGlobal prevalence of chronic kidney disease—a systematic review and meta-analysisPLoS One201611e015876510.1371/journal.pone.0158765Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[2]Johnson CA, Levey AS, Coresh J, Levin A, Lau J, Eknoyan G. Clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease in adults: part I. Definition, disease stages, evaluation, treatment, and risk factors. Am Fam Physician. 2004; 70:869–76.JohnsonCALeveyASCoreshJLevinALauJEknoyanGClinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease in adults: part I. Definition, disease stages, evaluation, treatment, and risk factorsAm Fam Physician20047086976Search in Google Scholar

[3]Fiorini F, Barozzi L. The role of ultrasonography in the study of medical nephropathy. J Ultrasound. 2007; 10:161–7.FioriniFBarozziLThe role of ultrasonography in the study of medical nephropathyJ Ultrasound200710161710.1016/j.jus.2007.09.001Search in Google Scholar

[4]El-Reshaid W, Abdul-Fattah H. Sonographic assessment of renal size in healthy adults. Med Princ Pract. 2014; 23:432–36.El-ReshaidWAbdul-FattahHSonographic assessment of renal size in healthy adultsMed Princ Pract2014234323610.1159/000364876Search in Google Scholar

[5]Papatheodorou K, Papanas N, Banach M, Papazoglou D, Michael E. Complications of diabetes 2016. J Diabetes Res. 2016; 3:6989453. doi: 10.1155/2016/6989453PapatheodorouKPapanasNBanachMPapazoglouDMichaelEComplications of diabetes 2016J Diabetes Res20163698945310.1155/2016/6989453Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[6]Singh A, Gupta K, Chander R, Vira M. Sonographic grading of renal cortical echogenicity and raised serum creatinine in patients with chronic kidney disease. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2016; 5:2279–86.SinghAGuptaKChanderRViraMSonographic grading of renal cortical echogenicity and raised serum creatinine in patients with chronic kidney diseaseJ Evolution Med Dent Sci2016522798610.14260/jemds/2016/530Search in Google Scholar

[7]Korkmaz M, Aras B, Güneyli S, Yılmaz M. Clinical significance of renal cortical thickness in patients with chronic kidney disease. Ultrasonography. 2018; 37:50–4.KorkmazMArasBGüneyliSYılmazMClinical significance of renal cortical thickness in patients with chronic kidney diseaseUltrasonography20183750410.14366/usg.17012Search in Google Scholar

[8]Beland MD, Walle NL, Machan JT, Cronan JJ. Renal cortical thickness measured at ultrasound: is it better than renal length as an indicator of renal function in chronic kidney disease? Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195:146–9.BelandMDWalleNLMachanJTCronanJJRenal cortical thickness measured at ultrasound: is it better than renal length as an indicator of renal function in chronic kidney disease?Am J Roentgenol2010195146910.2214/AJR.09.4104Search in Google Scholar

[9]Yamashita SR, von Atzingen AC, Iared W, Bezerra ASA, Ammirati AL, Canziani MEF, D’Ippolito G. Value of renal cortical thickness as a predictor of renal function impairment in chronic renal disease patients. Radiol. Bras. 2015; 48:12–6.YamashitaSRvon AtzingenACIaredWBezerraASAAmmiratiALCanzianiMEFD’IppolitoGValue of renal cortical thickness as a predictor of renal function impairment in chronic renal disease patientsRadiol. Bras20154812610.1590/0100-3984.2014.0008Search in Google Scholar

[10]Takata T, Koda M, Sugihara T, Sugihara S, Okamoto T, Miyoshi K, et al. Left renal cortical thickness measured by ultrasound can predict early progression of chronic kidney disease. Nephron. 2016; 132:25–32.TakataTKodaMSugiharaTSugiharaSOkamotoTMiyoshiKLeft renal cortical thickness measured by ultrasound can predict early progression of chronic kidney diseaseNephron2016132253210.1159/000441957Search in Google Scholar

[11]Roger SD, Beale AM, Cattell WR, Webb JA. What is the value of measuring renal parenchymal thickness before biopsy? Clin Radiol. 1994; 49:45–9.RogerSDBealeAMCattellWRWebbJAWhat is the value of measuring renal parenchymal thickness before biopsy?Clin Radiol19944945910.1016/S0009-9260(05)82913-7Search in Google Scholar

[12]Siddappa JK, Singla S, Al Ameen M, Rakshith SC, Kumar N. Correlation of ultrasonographic parameters with serum creatinine in chronic kidney disease. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2013; 3:28. doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.114809SiddappaJKSinglaSAl AmeenMRakshithSCKumarNCorrelation of ultrasonographic parameters with serum creatinine in chronic kidney diseaseJ Clin Imaging Sci201332810.4103/2156-7514.114809377938424083065Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13]Mounier-Vehier C, Lions C, Devos P, Joboureck O, Willoteaux S, Carre A, Beregi J-P. Cortical thickness: an early morphological marker of atherosclerotic renal disease. Kidney Int. 2002; 61:591–8.Mounier-VehierCLionsCDevosPJoboureckOWilloteauxSCarreABeregiJ-PCortical thickness: an early morphological marker of atherosclerotic renal diseaseKidney Int200261591810.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00167.x11849401Search in Google Scholar

[14]O’Neill WC. Renal relevant radiology: use of ultrasound in kidney disease and nephrology procedures. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014; 9:373–81.O’NeillWCRenal relevant radiology: use of ultrasound in kidney disease and nephrology proceduresClin J Am Soc Nephrol201493738110.2215/CJN.03170313391323024458082Search in Google Scholar

[15]Khati NJ, Hill MC, Kimmel PL. The role of ultrasound in renal insufficiency: the essentials. Ultrasound Q. 2005; 21:227–44.KhatiNJHillMCKimmelPLThe role of ultrasound in renal insufficiency: the essentialsUltrasound Q2005212274410.1097/01.wnq.0000186666.61037.f616344727Search in Google Scholar

[16]Chapter 1. Definition and classification of CKD. Kidney Int. Suppl (2011). 2013; 3:19–62. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2012.64Chapter 1. Definition and classification of CKDKidney Int. Suppl (2011)20133196210.1038/kisup.2012.64408969325018975Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[17]Vupputuri S, Kimes TM, Calloway MO, Christian JB, Bruhn D, Martin AA, Nichols GA. The economic burden of progressive chronic kidney disease among patients with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2014; 28:10–6.VupputuriSKimesTMCallowayMOChristianJBBruhnDMartinAANicholsGAThe economic burden of progressive chronic kidney disease among patients with type 2 diabetesJ Diabetes Complications20142810610.1016/j.jdiacomp.2013.09.01424211091Search in Google Scholar

[18]Wang V, Vilme H, Maciejewski ML, Boulware LE. The economic burden of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Semin Nephrol. 2016; 36:319–30.WangVVilmeHMaciejewskiMLBoulwareLEThe economic burden of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal diseaseSemin Nephrol2016363193010.1016/j.semnephrol.2016.05.00827475662Search in Google Scholar

[19]Agarwal AK, Singla S, Garg U, Yadav R, Miglani S, Jain AK. Glomerular filtration rate and total kidney volume in cases of recent onset type-2 diabetes mellitus. J Indian Acad Clin Med. 2005; 6:285–90.AgarwalAKSinglaSGargUYadavRMiglaniSJainAKGlomerular filtration rate and total kidney volume in cases of recent onset type-2 diabetes mellitusJ Indian Acad Clin Med2005628590Search in Google Scholar

[20]Alicic RZ, Rooney MT, Tuttle KR. Diabetic kidney disease: challenges, progress, and possibilities. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017; 12:2032–45.AlicicRZRooneyMTTuttleKRDiabetic kidney disease: challenges, progress, and possibilitiesClin J Am Soc Nephrol20171220324510.2215/CJN.11491116571828428522654Search in Google Scholar

[21]Fred HL. Drawbacks and limitations of computed tomography: views from a medical educator. Tex Heart Inst J. 2004; 31:345–8.FredHLDrawbacks and limitations of computed tomography: views from a medical educatorTex Heart Inst J2004313458Search in Google Scholar

[22]Greer R, Boulware LE. Reducing CKD risks among vulnerable populations in primary care. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2015; 22:74–80.GreerRBoulwareLEReducing CKD risks among vulnerable populations in primary careAdv Chronic Kidney Dis201522748010.1053/j.ackd.2014.06.003429153825573516Search in Google Scholar

[23]Lalkhen AG, McCluskey A. Clinical tests: sensitivity and specificity. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care Pain. 2018; 8:221–3.LalkhenAGMcCluskeyAClinical tests: sensitivity and specificityContinuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care Pain20188221310.1093/bjaceaccp/mkn041Search in Google Scholar

[24]Nadeeshani S, Dassanayake R, Kodithuwakku U. Ultrasonic assessment of kidney length in a Sri Lankan farming population. Anuradhapura Med J. 2015; 9(2 Suppl):S07. doi: 10.4038/amj.v9i2Supp.7556NadeeshaniSDassanayakeRKodithuwakkuUUltrasonic assessment of kidney length in a Sri Lankan farming populationAnuradhapura Med J201592 SupplS0710.4038/amj.v9i2Supp.7556Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[25]Hekmatnia A, Isfahani, Yaraghi M. Sonographic measurement of absolute and relative renal length in healthy Isfahani adults. J Res Med Sci. 2004; 9:54–57.HekmatniaAIsfahaniYaraghiMSonographic measurement of absolute and relative renal length in healthy Isfahani adultsJ Res Med Sci200495457Search in Google Scholar

[26]Harris K, Stribling B. Automated estimated GFR reporting: a new tool to promote safer prescribing in patients with chronic kidney disease? Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007; 3:969–72.HarrisKStriblingBAutomated estimated GFR reporting: a new tool to promote safer prescribing in patients with chronic kidney disease?Ther Clin Risk Manag2007396972Search in Google Scholar