<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The author of the article discusses the subject of terminology in the field of cartographic methodology. The general purpose is to propose an internally consistent system of concepts which allows classification of cartographic presentation methods based on unambiguous criteria. For this purpose, in the article the concept of <italic>presentation method</italic> and the concept of <italic>presentation form</italic> were differentiated, the cartographic presentation method was divided into stages, and possible data transformation and visualization aspects during application of a method were specified. Then, review of the previous classifications of cartographic presentation methods was conducted which allows differentiation of two fundamental approaches to classification and comparison of the applied criteria. On this basis, the author’s classification of cartographic presentation methods was suggested in which three qualitative and four quantitative methods were differentiated. It constitutes a compromise between accepting unambiguous criteria and the possibility to differentiate methods fixed in cartographic convention.</abstract>

Method vs. form – an attempt to classify cartographic presentation methods

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The authors of the article pay their attention to the lack of a generally accepted classification of the cartographic presentation methods. The classification, which was described in the Ratajski’s handbook (1989) in the mostly extensive way, is commonly used in the Polish literature. According to the authors, it would be appropriate to modify one of the types of symbols (quantitative ones) as an independent method of data presentation at the quantitative level, in addition to the method of diagram, choropleth, dot method and isoline one.</abstract>

The place of the “quantitative signature symbols” in the classification of the cartographic presentation methods

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The author presents criteria of evaluation and assumption for early school education maps. Attention was payed to needs and perceptual possibilities of map users and cartographic correctness of maps. Main criteria of map evaluation – content and form of a map – have their unique attributes. In case of the first criterion they are accuracy and currency, classification of content and usability. Second criterion consist of: composition, colours, labels on the map and readability. Materials commissioned by Ministry of National Education were evaluated on the said criteria basis. Evaluation of maps for early school education revealed their flaws, among which absence of a scale can be named. Afterwards assumptions were developed and used to prepare own proposal of a map. Achieving maximum readability was a priority. Other assumptions concerned graphic balance, classification and hierarchy of content, simplicity of elaboration, usage of readable typefaces and adjustment of transmission to the age of users.</abstract>

Evaluation of selected maps used in early school education in Poland and proposal of a new solution

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">For many centuries on general geographical maps and early maritime maps geological information was rarely included. The map of the Wadi Hammamat valley, the Borgia world map, the Catalan world map and <italic>Carta de nauigar per le Isole nouamente</italic>... portolan chart were indicated as examples. Places where minerals occurred were presented mainly using textual descriptions.Among Renaissance maps and later maps published before the second half of the 18th century, the map of the Kingdom of Bavaria by Philipp Apian and the map of the Duchy of Świdnica in Silesia by Johann Wieland and Matthaus Schubart were discussed as examples. Distribution of raw materials and places of their extraction were shown using simple geometric signs with graphic characteristics for a given period.Mineralogical maps published in the second half of the 18th century were described based on the example of maps by Jean-Étienne Guettard and Johann Jirasek. Their content was compared with the texts accompanying them, developed under patronage of the contemporary scientific institutions and relevant methods of geological information presentation were described. From the late Renaissance symbols signifying extraction sites of raw materials had simplified and rather random shapes which indicates ‘unhurried’ development of cartographic methods on geological maps.</abstract>

Geological content on maps and in accompanying texts developed until the end of the 18th century

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 55 (2023): Issue 1 (January 2023)

Volume 54 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)

Volume 53 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)

Volume 52 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)

Volume 52 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)

Volume 52 (2020): Issue 2 (July 2020)

Volume 52 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)

Volume 51 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)

Volume 51 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)

Volume 51 (2019): Issue 2 (July 2019)

Volume 51 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)

Volume 50 (2018): Issue 4 (December 2018)

Volume 50 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)

Volume 50 (2018): Issue 2 (July 2018)

Volume 50 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)

Volume 49 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)

Volume 49 (2017): Issue 3 (September 2017)

Volume 49 (2017): Issue 2 (July 2017)

Volume 49 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)

Volume 48 (2016): Issue 4 (December 2016)

Volume 48 (2016): Issue 3 (September 2016)

Volume 48 (2016): Issue 2 (July 2016)

Volume 48 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)

Volume 47 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)

Volume 47 (2015): Issue 3 (September 2015)

Volume 47 (2015): Issue 2 (July 2015)

Volume 47 (2015): Issue 1 (March 2015)

Polish Cartographical Review

Journal's original version: electronic version  70 points in the evaluation of Ministry of Education and Science   The Polish Cartographical Review (Pol. Cartogr. Rev, PCR) is one of the oldest cartographic journals in the world. It has been distributed since 1969 as the continuation of the periodical that had been published in Lvov for 11 years (during the years 1923 to 1934) under the title The Polish Cartographical Review. The quarterly plays an essential role in connection with the increasing importance of spatial information in the contemporary world as well as due to the expanding of use of maps in many areas of social and economic life. As a result, cartography as a field of knowledge, dealing with the methodology of information transmission via maps, is becoming increasingly important; especially facing the new challenges posed by the technological changes, and in the natural consequence - cultural ones.  The thematic scope of the articles that are published in The Polish Cartographical Review is very diverse. It reflects the main development directions of the contemporary cartography that is worked up by the cartographers and another specialists from the other fields of science for whom the map is the subject of research or the visual presentation of the results. In the area of interest of the magazine are the problems of theory of cartography, editing and perception processes of maps, the use of cartography in the studies of social and economic phenomena, including the use of the remote sensing and GIS tools, as well as the cultural role of the map and the history of cartography.  Today, like before the World War II, The Polish Cartographical Review is an important forum for exchange of ideas between the cartographers - workers of science, and the contractors or users of space information in the field of research related to utilitarian aspects of the cartographic activity.  The magazine is a quarterly that is edited by Polish scientists connected with Polish Geographical Society. The reviewers are foreign and Polish scientists. The consultative body is the international Advisory Editorial Board. Social media  Twitter  Facebook   Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 