Analysis of the antibacterial properties of polycaprolactone modified with graphene, bioglass and zinc-doped bioglass

[1] Chen H., Gao D., Wang B., Zhao R., Guan M., Zheng L., Zhou X., Chai Z., Feng W., Graphene oxide as an anaerobic membrane scaffold and antagonistic effects against pathogenic E. coli and S. aureus, Nanotechnology, 2014, 25 (16), DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/25/16/165101. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Ciołek L., Karaś J., Olszyna A.R., Zaczyńska E., Czarny A., Żywicka B., Szamałek K., In Vitro Studies of Antibacterial Activity of Bioglasses Releasing Ag₊, Key Eng. Mater., 2011, 493–494, 108–113, DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.493-94.108. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Dias A.M., da Silva F.G., Monteiro A.P.F., Pinzón-García A.D., Sinisterra R.D., Cortés M.E., Polycaprolactone nanofibers loaded oxytetracycline hydrochloride and zinc oxide for treatment of periodontal disease, Mater Sci. Eng. C. Mater., Biol. Appl., 2019, 103, 109798, DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.109798. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Dziadek M., Zagrajczuk B., Menaszek E., Wegrzynowicz A., Pawlik J., Cholewa-Kowalska K., Gel-derived SiO₂–CaO– P₂O₅ bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics modified by SrO addition, Ceram. Int., 2016, 42 (5), 58, 42–57, DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.12.128. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Fonseca G.F.d., Avelino S.d.O.M., Mello D.d.C.R., Prado R.F.d., Campos T.M.B., Vasconcellos L.M.R.d., Triches E.d.S., Borges A.L.S., Scaffolds of PCL combined to bioglass: synthesis, characterization and biological performance, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 2020, 31 (41), DOI: 10.1007/s10856-020-06382-w. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Fredenberg S., Wahlgren M., Reslow M., Axelsson A., The mechanisms of drug release in poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-based drug delivery systems – A review, Int. J. Pharm., 2011, 415 (1–2), 34–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.05.049. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Han J.K., Marple B.F., Smith T.L., Murr A.H., Lanier B.J., Stambaugh J.W., Mugglin A.S., Effect of steroid-releasing sinus implants on postoperative medical and surgical interventions: an efficacy meta-analysis, Int. Forum Allergy and Rh., 2012 (2), 271–279, DOI: 10.1002/alr.21044. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Hu S., Chang J., Liu M., Ning C., Study on antibacterial effect of 45S5 Bioglass®, J. Mater Sci. Mater Med., 2009, 20, 281–286, DOI: 10.1007/s10856-008-3564-5. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ji H., Sun H., Qu X., Antibacterial applications of graphene-based nanomaterials: Recent achievements and challenges, Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev., 2016, 105 (Pt B), 176–189, DOI:10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.009. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Karatas A., Pehlivanoglu F., Salviz M., Kuvat N., Cebi I.T., Dikmen B., Sengoz G., The effects of the time of intranasal splinting on bacterial colonization, postoperative complications, and patient discomfort after septoplasty operations, Braz. J. Otorhinolar., 2016, 82 (6), 654–661, DOI:10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.11.008. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Kurantowicz N., Sawosz E., Jaworski S., Kutwin M., Strojny B., Wierzbicki M., Szeliga J., Hotowy A., Lipińska L., Koziński R., Jagiełło J., Chwalibog A., Interaction of graphene family materials with Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica, Nanoscale Res. Lett., 2015, 10 (23), DOI: 10.1186/s11671-015-0749-y. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Lina G., Boutite F., Tristan A., Bes M., Etienne J., Vandenesch F., Bacterial Competition for Human Nasal Cavity Colonization: Role of Staphylococcal agr Alleles, Appl. Environ. Microb., 2003, 69 (1), 18–23, DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.18-23.200. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Liu D., Nie W., Li D., Wang W., Zheng L., Zhang J., Zhang J., Peng C., Mo X., He C., 3D printed PCL/SrHA scaffold for enhanced bone regeneration, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 362 (15), 269–279, DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.015. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Liu S., Zeng T.H., Hofmann M., Burcombe E., Wei J., Jiang R., Kong J., Chen Y., Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: membrane and oxidative stress, ACS Nano, 2011, 5 (9), 6971–6980. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Liu Y., He L., Mustapha A., Li H., Hu Z., Lin M., Antibacterial activities of zinc oxide nanoparticles against Escherichia coli O157:H7, J. Appl. Microbiol., 2009, 107, 1193–1201, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04303.x. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Ma J., Zhang J., Xiong Z., Yong Y., Zhao X.S., Preparation, characterization and antibacterial properties of silver-modified graphene oxide, J. Mater Chem., 2011, 21, 3350–3352. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Mangadlao J.D., Santos C.M., Felipe M.J.L., Leon A.C.C., Rodrigues D.F., Advincula R.C., On the antibacterial mechanism of graphene oxide (GO) Langmuir–Blodgett films, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51 (14), 2886–2889. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Miola M., Verné E., Vitale-Brovarone C., Baino F, Antibacterial Bioglass-Derived Scaffolds: Innovative Synthesis Approach and Characterization, Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci., 2016, 7, 238–247, DOI:10.1111/ijag.12209. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Rajzer I., Kurowska A., Jabłoński A., Kwiatkowski R., Piekarczyk W, Hajduga M.B., Kopeć J., Sidzina M., Menaszek E., Scaffolds modified with graphene as future implants for nasal cartilage, J. Mater. Sci., 2020, 55 (9), 4030–4042. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Rajzer I., Dziadek M., Kurowska A., Cholewa-Kowalska K., Ziąbka M., Menaszek E., Douglas T.E.L., Electrospun polycaprolactone membranes with Zn-doped bioglass for nasal tissues treatment, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med, 2019, 30 (7), 80, DOI: 10.1007/s10856-019-6280-4. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Rapacz-Kmita A., Szaraniec B., Mikołajczyk M., Stodolak-Zych E., Dzierzkowska E., Gajek M., Dudek P., Multifunctional biodegradable polymer/clay nanocomposites with antibacterial properties in drug delivery systems, Acta Bioeng. Biomech., 2020, 22 (2), DOI: 10.37190/abb-01523-2019-03 Search in Google Scholar

[22] Rohr N., Nebe J.B., Schmidli F., Müller P., Weber M., Fischer H., Fischer J., Influence of bioactive glass-coating of zirconia implant surfaces on human osteoblast behavior in vitro, Dent. Mater., 2019, 35 (6), 862–870, DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.029. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Szponder T., Stodolak-Zych E., Polkowska I., Sobczyńska-Rak A., Impact of a pulsed magnetic field on selected polymer implant materials, Acta Bioeng. Biomech., 2019, 21 (1), DOI: 10.5277/ABB-01253-2018-04. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Turek A., Stoklosa K., Borecka A., Paul-Samojedny M., Kaczmarczyk B., Marcinkowski A., Kasperczyk J., Designing Biodegradable Wafers Based on Poly(L-lactide-coglycolide) and Poly(glycolide-co-ε-caprolactone) for the Prolonged and Local Release of Idarubicin for the Therapy of Glioblastoma Multiforme, Pharm. Res., 2020, 37 (5), 90, DOI: 10.1007/s11095-020-02810-2. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Woodruff M.A., Hutmacher D.W., The return of a forgotten polymer – Polycaprolactone in the 21st century, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2010, 35 (10), 1217–1256. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Wu F., Wei J., Liu C., O’Neill B., Ngothai Y., Fabrication and properties of porous scaffold of zein/PCL biocomposite for bone tissue engineering, Compos. Part B-Eng., 2012, 43 (5), 2192–2197. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Xiaoyi X., Qingbiao Y., Yongzhi W., Haijun Y., Xuesi C., Xiabin J., Biodegradable electrospun poly(l-lactide) fibers containing antibacterial silver nanoparticles, Eur. Polym. J., 2016, 42 (9), 2081–2087, DOI:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.03.032. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Zanni E., Bruni E., Chandraiahgari C.R., De Bellis,G., Santangelo M.G., Leone M., Bregnocchi A., Mancini P., Sarto M.S., Uccelletti D., Evaluation of the antibacterial power and biocompatibility of zinc oxide nanorods decorated graphene nanoplatelets: new perspectives for antibiodeteriorative approaches, J. Nanobiotechnol., 2017, 15, 57, DOI: 10.1186/s12951-017-0291-4. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Zhan S., Zhu D., Ma S., Yu W., Jia Y., Li Y., Yu H., Shen Z., Highly efficient removal of pathogenic bacteria with magnetic graphene composite, ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces, 2015, 7 (7), 4290–4298. Search in Google Scholar