Epidermal components enlist the first barrier between the organism and the environment. The mucus layer covers the body not only for a mechanical protective function but also serves as osmoregulation, chemical communication, social behavior, and protection from abrasion, toxins, heavy metal toxicity, and pathogens (Coello & Khan 1996, Robinette et al. 1998, Fernandes & Smith 2002, Qin et al. 2002, Ullal et al. 2008, Fuochi et al. 2017). The epidermal barrier is the first step of body defense not only for fish species but also for all multicellular organisms. Both the mucosal secretions of the organisms and the presence of microorganisms sheltering as well as their secretions are the factors that strengthen this barrier (Austin & McIntosh 1988, Fouz et al. 1990, Kalidasan et al. 2014). These mucosal secretions, together with the microbial bioactive compounds acquired from the epidermal flora, play an active role in the destruction of pathogens encountered by the organisms. Therefore, the antibacterial activity of these secretions is more effective on the pathogens present in the animal habitat. For this reason, it is seen that even individuals belonging to the same species have secretions that are effective on different pathogens (Ellis 2001, Ritchie 2006, Chau et al. 2013, Abdelmohsen et al. 2014).
Studies show that antimicrobial peptides in these mucus secretions, from epidermal or microflora origin, are the main defence elements against pathogens (Lauth et al. 2002, Shike et al., 2002, Cole et al. 2008, Masso-Silva & Diamond 2014). Several studies from the Atlantic Ocean have examined bacteria associated with fish species and which were shown to produce antimicrobial activity against human pathogens (Yap 1979, Fouz et al. 1990). Studies on the antimicrobial activity of mucus are not limited to fish species. In a study conducted by Ritchie on the coral species
In recent years, it is observed that studies on the antimicrobial properties of mucus secretions of elasmobranch species have been increasing. Batoidea is a superorder of cartilaginous fish commonly known as rays and skates. These species are considered important predators within marine ecosystems and generally live in demersal habitats. Their morphological properties as dorso-ventrally flattened bodies support moving on the bottom and hiding in the sand (Cortes 1999, Barria et al. 2015, Navia et al. 2017). Skates and rays are commonly taken especially as by-catch of trawl fisheries.
Because batoids are species that move between different water layers, they encounter a wide range of microbial diversity within the marine habitat. In this way, the flora can show great differences both at the species and individual levels. The diversity of microbiota may cause the antimicrobial activity of this barrier to be effective on other microbial species (Cho et al. 2007, Luer 2014, Ritchie et al. 2017).
In total, 38 batoid species were recorded from the Mediterranean Sea (Melendez et al. 2017).
Due to the misuse of existing antimicrobial agents, the competition against infections caused by antibiotic-resistant strains grows more difficult day by day. The World Health Organisation predicts that by 2050, human deaths from antibiotic-resistant infections will reach 10 million (O’Neill 2016). One of the most important strategies to prevent this scenario is the discovery of new antimicrobial agents. As with the antimicrobial agents discovered so far, the source for the new agents is the examination of unstudied creatures. With this point of view, research on bioactive substances in not only microscopic creatures but also animal and plant species are rapidly continuing. The Marmara Sea is rich in human pathogen species due to urban wastes being discharged with insufficient treatment. As with many species found in this environment, batoids can produce antimicrobial agents against these pathogens as part of their defence mechanism. The same situation is valid for bacterial species living in the aquatic environment and/or in the skin flora of these animals. Therefore, in our study, we preferred the Marmara Sea Elasmobranchii species, which have a high probability of encountering these active compounds due to the pathogen density. In summary, the aim of this study is to determine the antimicrobial effect of mucus samples and culturable bacteria belonging to the skin flora of the discarded
Fifteen specimens of three different fish species were caught by fishermen from the North Sea of Marmara (Hoskoy Coast). Samplings, after being carefully washed with sterile seawater to remove allochthone bacteria, were made from the discarded dead species, brought to the port by the fishermen. Epidermal mucus was obtained from the pectoral fin surfaces with a sterile scoopula, transferred to sterile culture tubes, and frozen and stored at -20°C. A swab collection of fresh mucus was used to isolate bacteria from the dorsal surfaces of each individual.
Mucus extraction was based on Vennila et al. 2011. Mucus samples were treated with distilled water, acetic acid (AA) and trifluoro acetic acid (TFA) and used in the experiments. For distilled water extraction, samples were lyophilized overnight followed by mixing mucus powder with distilled water and sonicating twice for a minute each. For AA extraction, the samples were mixed with 0.05 M acetic acid in the ratio of 3:4 and placed in a boiling water bath for 5 minutes. For TFA extraction, a 200 µg sample was dissolved in 2 ml of 0.1% TFA and kept on ice for 2 hours. For all solvents, after extraction the samples were centrifuged at 12000 × g for 30 min at 4°C, and the supernatants were lyophilized for 24 hours. Following that, the lyophilized samples were dissolved with distilled water and sterilised by a 0.20 μm pore diameter filter. The extracted skin mucus was added in a concentration range from 50 μg μl-1 to 6.5 μg μl-1 for antimicrobial assays.
Mucus samples were serially diluted in phosphate buffer saline solution. 100 μl aliquots of each dilution were spread onto Marine Agar (MA, Oxoid), 5% sheep blood tryptic soy agar (Blood-TSA, Oxoid), and Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA, Oxoid). After 24–48 hours of incubation at 30°C, all macroscopically and microscopically different colonies were selected to obtain a pure culture. Pure cultures were stored at -86°C in a 20% glycerol solution. Isolated bacterial strains' relationships between different feedlots and batoid species were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test. The SPSS 21 package program was found out experiment results.
After subculturing on MA, the antimicrobial activity of isolates was evaluated against indicator microorganisms
DNA isolations of isolates, detected to have antimicrobial activity, were performed with the GeneAll Exgene™ Cell SV DNA isolation kit. The PCR method was applied to determine the
To evaluate the antimicrobial activity the following formula was used:
Where C is the number of cultivable microorganisms without mucus treatment, and A is the number of cultivable microorganisms after mucus treatment. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line 3T3 cells were grown in DMEM:F12 (1:1) cell media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and with 100 U ml-1 penicillin and 100 μg ml-1 streptomycin at a humidified 37°C incubator providing 5% CO2.
3T3 fibroblast cells were trypsinized, counted, and seeded on 96-well plates at 10000 cell density per well. Mucus secretions from different species were diluted in cell culture media at 10-1000 μg ml-1 concentrations. The cells were incubated with mucus secretions for 24 and 48 h and cell viability was determined with MTT assay. At the end of each experiment, 30 μl MTT solution (5 mg ml-1) was added to each well, and after 4 h purple formazan crystals were dissolved in 100 μl DMSO. Optic density was measured at 570 nm test wavelength and 630 nm reference wavelength using ELISA reader (BioTek, CA).
SDS-PAGE was carried out according to Laemmli (1970). The protein contents of isolated skin mucoproteins from
In the study, when the antimicrobial activity of distilled water, AA and TFA extracts of mucus samples belonging to three species were investigated by the microdilution method, it was determined that only acetic acid extract was effective on the pathogens examined. A total of 164 bacteria were isolated from
Isolates from epidermal mucus of fish species and their rates of antimicrobial activity
Species | Number of colony (cfu ml-1) | Number of isolates | Antimicrobial activity rates of isolates (%) |
---|---|---|---|
2442.5 ± 67.4 | 64 | 0 | |
3665 ± 123.2 | 78 | 2 | |
37.5 ± 1.8 | 22 | 5 |
When the antimicrobial activity of distilled water, AA and TFA extracts of mucus samples belonging to three species were investigated by the microdilution method, it was determined that only acetic acid extract was effective on the pathogens examined. The
Growth inhibition rates (%) of tested strains by the acidic mucus extract of
Test microorganisms | The concentration of mucus extracts (μg μl-1) | Negative Control (cfu ml-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | 25 | 12.5 | 6.25 | ||
> 99.999 | > 99.699 | > 99.999 | > 99.999 | 2.23 × 1012 | |
2.57 × 1011 | |||||
95.100 | 94.869 | 2.98 × 1013 | |||
MRSA ATCC 33591 | 41.539 | 29.039 | 1.24 × 1011 | ||
VRE ATCC 51299 | 99.469 | 98.799 | 63.179 | 32.279 | 1.89 × 1012 |
> 99.999 | > 99.999 | > 99.999 | > 99.999 | 6.90 × 1011 |
Growth inhibition rates (%) of tested strains by the acidic mucus extract of
Test Microorganisms | The concentration of mucus extracts (μg μl-1) | Negative Control (cfu ml-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | 25 | 12.5 | 6.25 | ||
73.729 | 60.169 | 43.019 | 7.609 | 7.23 × 1013 | |
99.149 | 85.409 | 60.579 | 52.159 | 2.09 × 1013 | |
> 99.859 | > 92.479 | 43.699 | 37.399 | 2.38 × 1014 | |
MRSA ATCC 33591 | > 99.939 | > 99.609 | 99.229 | 98.089 | 3.87 × 1014 |
VRE ATCC 51299 | 91.249 | 75.469 | 24.499 | NR | 2.49 × 1010 |
> 99.999 | > 99.999 | > 99.999 | > 99.969 | 8.35 × 1011 |
NR: No reduction
Growth inhibition rates (%) of tested strains by the acidic mucus extract of
Test Microorganisms | The concentration of mucus extracts (μg μl-1) | Negative Control (cfu ml-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | 25 | 12.5 | 6.25 | ||
99.939 | 99.909 | 99.859 | 78.569 | 7.23 × 1013 | |
99.779 | 97.629 | 84.499 | 78.809 | 2.09 × 1013 | |
> 97.599 | > 94.669 | 90.889 | 89.079 | 2.38 × 1014 | |
MRSA ATCC 33591 | > 96.539 | > 92.799 | 89.769 | 87.189 | 3.87 × 1014 |
VRE ATCC 51299 | 99.959 | 98.579 | NR | NR | 2.49 × 1010 |
> 99.999 | > 99.999 | > 99.999 | > 99.989 | 8.35 × 1011 |
All diluted doses of
The concentration of 50 μg μl-1 of
The effects of the
The effects of
Treatment with the different mucus concentrations of
The high concentrations of
The effects of
The effects of
SDS-PAGE results showed. three major subunit bands (~100 kDa. ~50 kDa. and ~11 kDa) and a very faint band between ~11-5kD) resulted from analysis (Fig. 4).
SDS-PAGE of mucus and skin extracts of
Skates and rays have adaptations for living in the demersal zones. The first barrier between fish and the environment consists of skin mucus and the mucus layer includes different biochemical components secreted by epidermal cells. It serves as a mechanical and biological protection for fish.
Indicator bacteria for water pollution are frequently examined in the microbiological studies of the Turkish seas. However, there are insufficient studies in terms of the potential bioactive compounds that may have the bacteria that colonize the surface of organisms such as fish. (Altug et al. 2012, Cardak & Altug 2014, Kalkan & Altug 2015, Ciftci Türetken and Altug 2016). It is important to increase these studies to better understand the defense mechanisms of these creatures living in these seas, which are of high microbial diversity due to different chemical, physical, geological, and climatic effects, and to enable the obtaining of new bioactive compounds.
Several studies from Atlantic Oceans and the Mediterranean Sea have focused on symbiotic bacterial flora in the skin mucus layer and mucus biochemical properties. Two batoid species,
According to the literature, secreted material from fish skin has an antimicrobial effect against Gram – and Gram + bacterial strains (Monteiro-Dos-Santos et al. 2011, Kalidasan et al. 2014, Fuochi et al. 2017). Antimicrobial peptides were exhibited in different fish skin mucus. The inhibition effect against bacterial strains and anti-tumoral traits were demonstrated in the intestinal bioactive compound of
The skin mucus of thirteen different fish species was tested for antifungal, antimicrobial, and cytotoxic activities of epidermal extracts (Hellio et al. 2002). In this study, in which different organic extracts were tested, it was observed that, especially depending on the given fish species, dichloromethane and ethanol extracts had antimicrobial effects without any cytotoxic properties. In another study, the skin mucus of
In our study, the mucus was extracted with an acidic solvent to obtain the basic antimicrobial compounds, such as peptides. Similarly, previous reports on acidic mucus extraction methods for
The antibacterial compounds as proteinases were purified from various fishes such as trout, salmon, and eel. In literature, pardaxin by
The studies regarding the observation of antimicrobial properties of the skin mucus of marine fishes are limited in comparison to the studies of the skin mucus of freshwater fishes. However, the preliminary assays of skin mucus in the study indicated that the marine fishes are important sources for developing potential antimicrobial compounds against the invading pathogens in the absence of evident toxic effects on mouse fibroblasts. Further research needs to focus on the identification of specific compounds responsible for new pharmacological strategies for antimicrobial activity. It might show alternative usage as the potential by-product of wild marine sources for different industries. The skin mucus of marine species in the seas around Turkey can be an interesting source for new antimicrobial compounds.