[Achinstein, P., ed. 1983. The Concept of Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baroni, P., and Vicig, P. 2001. On the conceptual status of belief functions with respect to coherent lower probabilities. In Bishop, C., ed., Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty; Lecture Notes In Computer Science, Vol. 2143. London: Springer-Verlag. 328-339.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bonissone, P. P. 1987. Summarizing and propagating uncertain information with Triangular Norms. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 1:71-101.10.1016/0888-613X(87)90005-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Carnap, R. 1950. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheeseman, P. 1988. An inquiry into computer understanding. Computational Intelligence 4:58-66.10.1111/j.1467-8640.1988.tb00091.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Clifford, W. K. 1877. The ethics of belief. Contemporary Review. Reprinted in The Ethics of Belief and Other Essays (Prometheus Books, 1999).]Search in Google Scholar
[DeGroot, M. H. 1970. Optimal Statistical Decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dempster, A. P. 1967. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38:325-339.10.1214/aoms/1177698950]Search in Google Scholar
[Dubois, D., and Prade, H. 1982. A class of fuzzy measures based on triangular norms. International Journal of General Systems 8:43-61.10.1080/03081078208934833]Search in Google Scholar
[Dubois, D., and Prade, H. 1994. Conditional objects as nonmonotonic consequence relationships. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 24:1724-1740.10.1109/21.328930]Search in Google Scholar
[Fitelson, B., and Hawthorne, J. 2009. How Bayesian confirmation theory handles the Paradox of the Ravens. In Eells, E., and Fetzer, J., eds., Probability in Science. Chicago: Open Court. Forthcoming.10.1007/978-90-481-3615-5_11]Search in Google Scholar
[Good, I. J. 1950. Probability and the Weighing of Evidence. London: Griffin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Good, I. J. 1985. Weight of evidence: a brief survey. In Bernardo, J.; DeGroot, M.; Lindley, D.; and Smith, A., eds., Bayesian Statistics 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 249-269.]Search in Google Scholar
[Griggs, R. A., and Cox, J. R. 1982. The elusive thematic-materials effect in Wason's selection task. British Journal of Psychology 73:407-420.10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01823.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Halpern, J. Y., and Pucella, R. 2006. A logic for reasoning about evidence. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 26:1-34.10.1613/jair.1838]Search in Google Scholar
[Hempel, C. G. 1965. Studies in the logic of confirmation. In Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: The Free Press. 3-46. Reprinted in The Concept of Evidence, Achinstein, P. (Ed), Oxford University Press, pp. 11-43, 1983.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hume, D. 1748. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. London.10.1093/oseo/instance.00032980]Search in Google Scholar
[Hutter, M. 2005. Universal Artificial Intelligence: Sequential Decisions based on Algorithmic Probability. Berlin: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keynes, J. M. 1921. A Treatise on Probability. London: Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kyburg, H. E. 1983a. Recent work in inductive logic. In Lucey, K., and Machan, T., eds., Recent Work in Philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanfield. 89-150.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kyburg, H. E. 1983b. The reference class. Philosophy of Science 50:374-397.10.1086/289125]Search in Google Scholar
[Kyburg, H. E. 1994. Believing on the basis of the evidence. Computational Intelligence 10:3-20.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCarthy, J., and Hayes, P. J. 1969. Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In Meltzer, B., and Michie, D., eds., Machine Intelligence 4. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 463-502.]Search in Google Scholar
[McDermott, D. 1987. A critique of pure reason. Computational Intelligence 3:151-160.10.1111/j.1467-8640.1987.tb00183.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Milne, P. 1997. Bruno de Finetti and the logic of conditional events. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48:195-232.10.1093/bjps/48.2.195]Search in Google Scholar
[Oaksford, M., and Chater, N. 1994. A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review 101:608-631.10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.608]Search in Google Scholar
[Pearl, J. 1988. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. San Mateo, California: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pearl, J. 1990. Jeffrey's rule, passage of experience, and Neo-Bayesianism. In Kyburg, H. E.; Loui, R. P.; and N., C. G., eds., Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 245-265.10.1007/978-94-009-0553-5_10]Search in Google Scholar
[Peirce, C. S. 1878. The probability of induction. Popular Science Monthly 12:705-718. Reprinted in The Essential Peirce, Vol. 1, N. Houser and C. Kloesel, eds., Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press (1992), 155-169.]Search in Google Scholar
[Popper, K. R. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.10.1063/1.3060577]Search in Google Scholar
[Reiter, R. 1987. Nonmonotonic reasoning. Annual Review of Computer Science 2:147-186.10.1146/annurev.cs.02.060187.001051]Search in Google Scholar
[Rescher, N. 1958. A theory of evidence. Philosophy of Science 25(1):83-94.10.1086/287579]Search in Google Scholar
[Shafer, G. 1976. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smets, P., and Kennes, R. 1994. The transferable belief model. Artificial Intelligence 66:191-234.10.1016/0004-3702(94)90026-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Smets, P. 1991. The transferable belief model and other interpretations of Dempster-Shafer's model. In Bonissone, P. P.; Henrion, M.; Kanal, L. N.; and Lemmer, J. F., eds., Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 6. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 375-383.]Search in Google Scholar
[Solomonoff, R. J. 1964. A formal theory of inductive inference. Part I and II. Information and Control 7(1-2):1-22,224-254.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124-1131.10.1126/science.185.4157.112417835457]Search in Google Scholar
[Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. 1983. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review 90:293-315.10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293]Search in Google Scholar
[Walley, P. 1991. Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. London: Chapman and Hall.10.1007/978-1-4899-3472-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Walley, P. 1996a. Inferences from multinomial data: learning about a bag of marbles. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 58:3-57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walley, P. 1996b. Measures of uncertainty in expert systems. Artificial Intelligence 83:1-58.10.1016/0004-3702(95)00009-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, P. 1993. Belief revision in probability theory. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 519-526. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, California.10.1016/B978-1-4832-1451-1.50068-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, P. 1994a. A defect in Dempster-Shafer Theory. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 560-566. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, California.10.1016/B978-1-55860-332-5.50076-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, P. 1994b. From inheritance relation to nonaxiomatic logic. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 11(4):281-319.10.1016/0888-613X(94)90021-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, P. 1995a. Non-Axiomatic Reasoning System: Exploring the Essence of Intelligence. Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, P. 1995b. Reference classes and multiple inheritances. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and and Knowledge-based Systems 3(1):79-91.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, P. 1996a. Heuristics and normative models of judgment under uncertainty. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 14(4):221-235.10.1016/0888-613X(95)00091-T]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, P. 1996b. The interpretation of fuzziness. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics 26(4):321-326.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, P. 2001a. Abduction in non-axiomatic logic. In Working Notes of the IJCAI workshop on Abductive Reasoning, 56-63.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, P. 2001b. Confidence as higher-order uncertainty. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications, 352-361.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, P. 2001c. Wason's cards: what is wrong? In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Cognitive Science, 371-375.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, P. 2004. The limitation of Bayesianism. Artificial Intelligence 158(1):97-106.10.1016/j.artint.2003.09.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, P. 2005. Experience-grounded semantics: a theory for intelligent systems. Cognitive Systems Research 6(4):282-302.10.1016/j.cogsys.2004.08.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, P. 2006. Rigid Flexibility: The Logic of Intelligence. Dordrecht: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wason, P. C., and Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1972. Psychology of Reasoning: Structure and Content. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zadeh, L. A. 1975. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information Sciences 8:199-249, 8:301-357, 9:43-80.10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5]Search in Google Scholar