Login
Registrieren
Passwort zurücksetzen
Veröffentlichen & Verteilen
Verlagslösungen
Vertriebslösungen
Themen
Allgemein
Altertumswissenschaften
Architektur und Design
Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, Buchwissenschaft
Biologie
Chemie
Geowissenschaften
Geschichte
Industrielle Chemie
Informatik
Jüdische Studien
Kulturwissenschaften
Kunst
Linguistik und Semiotik
Literaturwissenschaft
Materialwissenschaft
Mathematik
Medizin
Musik
Pharmazie
Philosophie
Physik
Rechtswissenschaften
Sozialwissenschaften
Sport und Freizeit
Technik
Theologie und Religion
Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Veröffentlichungen
Zeitschriften
Bücher
Konferenzberichte
Verlage
Blog
Kontakt
Suche
EUR
USD
GBP
Deutsch
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Warenkorb
Home
Zeitschriften
Transactions on Aerospace Research
Band 2023 (2023): Heft 2 (June 2023)
Uneingeschränkter Zugang
Modelling of the Monolithic Stiffener Forming Process from a Paek Thermoplastic Composite Matrix Using Pam-Form Software
Witold Polański
Witold Polański
| 12. Juni 2023
Transactions on Aerospace Research
Band 2023 (2023): Heft 2 (June 2023)
Über diesen Artikel
Vorheriger Artikel
Nächster Artikel
Zusammenfassung
Artikel
Figuren und Tabellen
Referenzen
Autoren
Artikel in dieser Ausgabe
Vorschau
PDF
Zitieren
Teilen
Article Category:
research article
Online veröffentlicht:
12. Juni 2023
Seitenbereich:
58 - 75
Eingereicht:
18. März 2021
Akzeptiert:
13. Apr. 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/tar-2023-0012
Schlüsselwörter
thermoplastic composite
,
thermoforming
,
fabric
,
PAEK
,
numerical analysis
,
monolithic part
,
aviation
© 2023 Witold Polański, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Model of monolithic door stiffening part for the ILX-34 aircraft [11].
Figure 2.
Dimensions of the ILX-34 aircraft door in millimetres [11].
Figure 3.
Examples of spring fastenings using ‘colds pots’ zones [5].
Figure 4.
Example of mounting the blank on a transport frame.
Figure 5.
a) Block diagram of the thermoforming process [13], b) process chart.
Figure 6.
Scheme of a composite sample for determining the shear angle: a) before applying force, b) after reaching the maximum elongation [16].
Figure 7.
a) Model of the stretched sample (shear angle in degrees), b) illustrative photo of the stretched sample [18].
Figure 8.
Graph of the theoretical shear angle change.
Figure 9.
Tensile test result [15].
Figure 10.
Shear stiffness in the plane of the layer G.
Figure 11.
Comparison of stretching graphs of the composite sample at 360°C and the result of numerical analysis.
Figure 12.
Comparison of theoretical shear angle and shear angle diagrams obtained in the numerical analysis.
Figure 13.
Diagram of the test stand for bending the sample.
Figure 14.
Sample model during free overhanging: a) fibre direction 0°, b) displacement values in [mm] for 0° direction at T = 360°C.
Figure 15.
Comparison of the shape of the bent sample at T = 360°C in the direction of the fibres 0°.
Figure 16.
Comparison of the shape of the bent sample at T = 360°C in the direction of the fibres 90°.
Figure 17.
Diagram of a numerical model.
Figure 18.
Stamp displacement profile.
Figure 19.
Graph of spring stiffness used in the analysis.
Figure 20.
a) Blank displacements in the y direction, b) shear angles in the 45 layer.
Figure 21.
Comparison of the part shape with the result of the analysis.
Figure 22.
Mesh comparison: a) without local mesh ‘refinement’ option, b) local ‘refinement’ option at level 3.
Figure 23.
Shear angle values for: a) 0° layer, b) 45° layer.
Figure 24.
Values of bending moments in fibres during the process, for: a) 0° layer, b) 45° layer.
Figure 25.
Comparison of wrinkle formation as a result of the shear angle in the part with the result of the analysis.
Figure 26.
Formation of wrinkles as a result of bending the material.
Figure 27.
Values of friction coefficient during the process for a) 0° layer, b) 45° layer.
Vorschau