Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Transactions on Aerospace Research
Volume 2023 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)
Open Access
Modelling of the Monolithic Stiffener Forming Process from a Paek Thermoplastic Composite Matrix Using Pam-Form Software
Witold Polański
Witold Polański
| Jun 12, 2023
Transactions on Aerospace Research
Volume 2023 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Article Category:
research article
Published Online:
Jun 12, 2023
Page range:
58 - 75
Received:
Mar 18, 2021
Accepted:
Apr 13, 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/tar-2023-0012
Keywords
thermoplastic composite
,
thermoforming
,
fabric
,
PAEK
,
numerical analysis
,
monolithic part
,
aviation
© 2023 Witold Polański, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Model of monolithic door stiffening part for the ILX-34 aircraft [11].
Figure 2.
Dimensions of the ILX-34 aircraft door in millimetres [11].
Figure 3.
Examples of spring fastenings using ‘colds pots’ zones [5].
Figure 4.
Example of mounting the blank on a transport frame.
Figure 5.
a) Block diagram of the thermoforming process [13], b) process chart.
Figure 6.
Scheme of a composite sample for determining the shear angle: a) before applying force, b) after reaching the maximum elongation [16].
Figure 7.
a) Model of the stretched sample (shear angle in degrees), b) illustrative photo of the stretched sample [18].
Figure 8.
Graph of the theoretical shear angle change.
Figure 9.
Tensile test result [15].
Figure 10.
Shear stiffness in the plane of the layer G.
Figure 11.
Comparison of stretching graphs of the composite sample at 360°C and the result of numerical analysis.
Figure 12.
Comparison of theoretical shear angle and shear angle diagrams obtained in the numerical analysis.
Figure 13.
Diagram of the test stand for bending the sample.
Figure 14.
Sample model during free overhanging: a) fibre direction 0°, b) displacement values in [mm] for 0° direction at T = 360°C.
Figure 15.
Comparison of the shape of the bent sample at T = 360°C in the direction of the fibres 0°.
Figure 16.
Comparison of the shape of the bent sample at T = 360°C in the direction of the fibres 90°.
Figure 17.
Diagram of a numerical model.
Figure 18.
Stamp displacement profile.
Figure 19.
Graph of spring stiffness used in the analysis.
Figure 20.
a) Blank displacements in the y direction, b) shear angles in the 45 layer.
Figure 21.
Comparison of the part shape with the result of the analysis.
Figure 22.
Mesh comparison: a) without local mesh ‘refinement’ option, b) local ‘refinement’ option at level 3.
Figure 23.
Shear angle values for: a) 0° layer, b) 45° layer.
Figure 24.
Values of bending moments in fibres during the process, for: a) 0° layer, b) 45° layer.
Figure 25.
Comparison of wrinkle formation as a result of the shear angle in the part with the result of the analysis.
Figure 26.
Formation of wrinkles as a result of bending the material.
Figure 27.
Values of friction coefficient during the process for a) 0° layer, b) 45° layer.
Preview