[Alexandropoulos, Georgios. 2015. Stylistic devices of Christians expressing contradiction against the Gentiles. In Cinzia Russi (ed.), Current trends in historical sociolinguistics, 19–45. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110488401-00510.1515/9783110488401-005]Search in Google Scholar
[Auer, Anita. 2015. Stylistic variation. In Anita Auer, Daniel Schreier & Richard J. Watts (eds), Letter writing and language change, 133–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139088275.00910.1017/CBO9781139088275.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Auer, Anita, Catharina Peersman, Simon Pickl, Gijsbert Rutten & Rik Vosters. 2015. Historical sociolinguistics: The field and its future. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 1(1). 1–12. DOI: 10.1515/jhsl-2015-000110.1515/jhsl-2015-0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Barber, Richard. 1986. The Pastons. A family in the Wars of the Roses. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bell, Allan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13(2). 145–204.10.1017/S004740450001037X]Search in Google Scholar
[Bell, Allan. 2001. Back in style: Reworking Audience Design. In Penelope Eckert & John Rickford (eds), Style and sociolinguistic variation, 139–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511613258.01010.1017/CBO9780511613258.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Bennett, Henry S. 1995 [1932]. The Pastons and their England: Studies in an age of transition (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Benskin, Michael. 1977. Local archives and Middle English dialects. Journal of the Society of Archivists 5(8). 500–514. DOI: 10.1080/0037981770951409010.1080/00379817709514090]Search in Google Scholar
[Benskin, Michael. 1982. The letters <þ> and <y> in later Middle English, and some related matters. Journal of the Society of Archivists 7(1). 13–30. DOI: 10.1080/0037981820951419910.1080/00379818209514199]Search in Google Scholar
[Bergs, Alexander. 2005. Social networks and historical sociolinguistics: Studies in morphosyntactic variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110923223]Search in Google Scholar
[Biber, Douglas. 1995. Dimensions of register reconstruction. A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519871]Search in Google Scholar
[Biber, Douglas. 2001. Dimensions of variation among 18th- century registers. In Hans-Jürgen Diller & Manfred Görlach (eds), Towards a history of English as a history of genres, 89–110. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1989. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text & Talk 9(1). 93–124. DOI: 10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.9310.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.93]Search in Google Scholar
[Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1997. Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds), To explain the present: Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen, 253–275. Helsinki: Société Neophilologique.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blake, Norman F. 1992. Introduction. In Norman F. Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. 2: 1066-1476, 1–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Blume, Richard 1882. Die Sprache der Paston Letters. Beitrag zur historischen Grammatik des Englischen. Programm der Realschhule beim Doventhor zu Bremen.]Search in Google Scholar
[Castor, Helen. 2004. Blood and roses. The Paston family in the fifteenth century. London: Faber & Faber.]Search in Google Scholar
[Christy, T. Craig. 1983. Uniformitarianism in linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/sihols.31]Search in Google Scholar
[Conde-Silvestre, J. Camilo. 2007. Sociolingüística histórica. Madrid: Gredos.]Search in Google Scholar
[Conde-Silvestre, J. Camilo. 2012. The role of social networks and mobility in diachronic sociolinguistics. In Juan M. Hernández-Campoy & J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 332–352. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118257227.ch1810.1002/9781118257227.ch18]Search in Google Scholar
[Conde-Silvestre, J. Camilo. 2016a. Historical sociolinguistics. In Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds), Handbook of pragmatics: 2016 installment. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/hop.20.his410.1075/hop.20.his4]Search in Google Scholar
[Conde-Silvestre, J. Camilo. 2016b. A ‘third-wave’ historical sociolinguistic approach to late Middle English correspondence: Evidence from the Stonor Letters. In Cinzia Russi (ed.), Current Trends in Historical Sociolinguistics, 46-66. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110488401-00610.1515/9783110488401-006]Search in Google Scholar
[Conde-Silvestre, J. Camilo. 2019. Spelling focusing and proto-standardisation in a fifteenth-century English community of practice. Studia Neophilologica 91(1). 11–30. DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2019.157818110.1080/00393274.2019.1578181]Search in Google Scholar
[Conde-Silvestre, J. Camilo & Juan M. Hernández-Campoy. 2004. A sociolinguistic approach to the diffusion of Chancery written practices in late fifteenth century private correspondence. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 105(2). 133–152.]Search in Google Scholar
[Conde-Silvestre, J. Camilo & Juan M. Hernández-Campoy. 2013. Tracing the generational progress of language change in fifteenth century English: The digraph <th> in the Paston Letters. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 114(3). 279–299.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511755064]Search in Google Scholar
[Davis, Norman O. 1989 [1954]. The language of the Pastons. In James A. Burrow (ed.), Middle English literature: British Academy Gollancz lectures, 45–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davis, Norman O. (ed.), 1971–1976. Paston letters and papers of the fifteenth century (2 vols). Oxford: Clarendon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davis, Norman O. 1983 The language of two brothers in the fifteenth century. In Eric G. Stanley & Douglas Gray (eds), Five hundred years of words and sounds. A festschrift for Eric Dobson, 23–28. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Ruth Wodak. 1982. Sociophonological methods in the study of sociolinguistic variation in Viennese German. Language in Society 11(3). 339–370.10.1017/S0047404500009350]Search in Google Scholar
[Elspaβ, Stephan. 2002. Standard German in the 19th-century? (Counter-) evidence from the private correspondence of “ordinary people”. In Andrew R. Linn & Nicola McLelland (eds), Standardization: Studies from the Germanic languages, 43–65. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/cilt.235.05els10.1075/cilt.235.05els]Search in Google Scholar
[Gies, Frances & Joseph Gies. 1998. A medieval family: The Pastons of fifteenth-century England. New York, NY: Harper Collins.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gómez-Soliño, José. 1997. Pastons, Celys and the standard language in the late fifteenth century. In Margarita Giménez Bon & Vicky Olsen (eds), Proceedings of the IXth international conference of the Spanish Society for Medieval English Language and Literature, 117–139. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Universidad del País Vasco.]Search in Google Scholar
[González Escribano, José Luis G. 1982. Word-order and stylistic distortion in the letters of William Paston I, 1425–1442: A transformational approach. Anglo American Studies 2. 85–112.]Search in Google Scholar
[González Escribano, José Luis. 1985. Retórica epistolar en la Inglaterra del siglo XV: El caso de William Paston I, 1378–1444. In Fernando Galván (ed.), Estudios literarios ingleses. Edad Media, 253–283. Madrid: Cátedra.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. 2008. Overt and covert prestige in Late Middle English: A case study in East Anglia. Folia Linguistica Historica 29. 1–26. DOI: 10.1515/FLIH.2008.110.1515/FLIH.2008.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. 2016a. Sociolinguistic styles. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118737606]Search in Google Scholar
[Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. 2016b. Authorship and gender in English historical sociolinguistic research: Samples from the Paston Letters. In Cinzia Russi (ed.), Current trends in historical sociolinguistics, 108–142. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110488401-00910.1515/9783110488401-009]Search in Google Scholar
[Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. & J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre. 1999. The social diffusion of linguistic innovations in fifteenth century England: Chancery spellings in private correspondence. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa 8. 251–274.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. & J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds). 2012. The handbook of historical sociolinguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118257227]Search in Google Scholar
[Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. & J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre. 2015. Assessing variability and change in early English letters. In Anita Auer, Daniel Schreier & Richard J. Watts (eds), Letter writing and language change, 14–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139088275.00310.1017/CBO9781139088275.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. & Tamara García-Vidal. 2018a. Persona management and identity projection in English medieval society: Evidence from John Paston II. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 4(1). 1–31. DOI: 10.1515/jhsl-2016-002710.1515/jhsl-2016-0027]Search in Google Scholar
[Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. & Tamara García-Vidal. 2018b. Style-shifting and accommodative competence in Late Middle English written correspondence: Putting audience design to the test of time. Folia Linguistica Historica 39(2). 383-420. DOI: 10.1515/flih-2018-001410.1515/flih-2018-0014]Search in Google Scholar
[Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. & Natalie Schilling-Estes. 2012. The application of the quantitative paradigm to historical sociolinguistics: Problems with the generalizability principle. In Juan M. Hernández-Campoy & J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 63–79. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118257227.ch410.1002/9781118257227.ch4]Search in Google Scholar
[Hickey, Raymond. 1999. Developments and change in Dublin English. In Ernst Håkon Jahr (ed.), Language change. Advances in historical sociolinguistics, 209–243. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hogg, Richard. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Richard Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol 1: The beginnings to 1066, 67–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521264747.00410.1017/CHOL9780521264747.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Jensen, Vibeke. 2012. The consonantal element (th) in some late Middle English Yorkshire texts. In Jukka Tyrkkö, Matti Kilpiö, Terttu Nevalainen & Matti Rissanen (eds), Outposts of historical corpus linguistics: From the Helsinki Corpus to a proliferation of resources. Helsinki: Research Unit for Variation, Contact and Change in English. https://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/10/jensen/ [Accessed April 20, 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[Labov, William. 1966a. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.]Search in Google Scholar
[Labov, William. 1966b. Hypercorrection by the lower middle class as a factor in linguistic change. In William Bright (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Proceedings of the UCLA Sociolinguistics Conference, 1964, 84–113. The Hague: Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110856507-00810.1515/9783110856507-008]Search in Google Scholar
[Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Labov, William. 1973. The linguistic consequences of being a lame. Language in Society 2(1). 81–115. DOI: 10.1017/S004740450000007510.1017/S0047404500000075]Search in Google Scholar
[Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Labov, William. 2001. The anatomy of style-shifting. In Penelope Eckert & John R. Rickford (eds) Style and sociolinguistic variation, 85–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511613258.00610.1017/CBO9780511613258.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Lass, Roger. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Norman F. Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol 2: 1066–1476, 23–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.00310.1017/CHOL9780521264754.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Maas, Utz. 1988 On the interpretive analysis of historical records: Linguistic relations in seventeenth century Osnabrück. In Peter Auer & Aldo di Luzio (eds), Variation and convergence, 11–43. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mattheier, Klaus. 1981. Wege und Umwege zur neuhochdeutschen Schriftsprache. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 9(3). 274–307. DOI: 10.1515/zfgl.1981.9.3.27410.1515/zfgl.1981.9.3.274]Search in Google Scholar
[McIntosh, Angus. 1974. Towards an inventory of Middle English scribes. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 75(4). 602–624.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2006. Introducing sociolinguistics. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203966709]Search in Google Scholar
[Millar, Robert McColl. 2012. English historical sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748664382]Search in Google Scholar
[Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy 1985. Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21(2). 339–384. DOI: 10.1017/S002222670001030610.1017/S0022226700010306]Search in Google Scholar
[Milroy, Lesley. 1987. Language and social networks (2nd edn). Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Milroy, Lesley. 2002. Social networks. In Jack K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds), The handbook of language variation and change, 549–572. Oxford & Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9781405116923.2003.00030.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Mihm, Arend, Michael Elmentaler, Stephanie Heth, Kerstin Salewski & Tim Stichlmair. 2000. Die frühneuzeitliche Überschichtung der rheinmaasländischen Stadtsprachen. Ein Duisburger Forschungsprojekt zur Entstehung der deutsch-niederländischen Sprachgrenze. In Michael Elmentaler (ed.), Regionalsprachen, Stadtsprachen und Institutionssprachen im historischen Prozess, 117–156. Vienna: Edition Praesens.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nevala, Minna & Minna Palander-Collin. 2005. Letters and letter writing: Introduction. European Journal of English Studies 9(1). 1–7. DOI: 10.1080/1382557050006790310.1080/13825570500067903]Search in Google Scholar
[Nevalainen, Terttu. 2006. Historical sociolinguistics and language change. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), The handbook of the history of English, 558–588. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9780470757048.ch2210.1002/9780470757048.ch22]Search in Google Scholar
[Nevalainen, Terttu 2007. Introduction. In Terttu Nevalainen & Sanna Kaisa Tanskanen (eds), Letter writing, 1–11. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/bct.1.02nev10.1075/bct.1.02nev]Search in Google Scholar
[Nevalainen, Terttu. 2011. Historical sociolinguistics. In Ruth Wodak, Barbara Johnstone & Paul Kerswill (eds), The Sage handbook of sociolinguistics, 279–295. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446200957.n21]Search in Google Scholar
[Nevalainen, Terttu. 2015. What are historical sociolinguistics? Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 1(2). 243–269. DOI: 10.1515/jhsl-2015-001410.1515/jhsl-2015-0014]Search in Google Scholar
[Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (eds). 1996. Sociolinguistics and language history: Studies based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Amsterdam: Rodopi.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 2012. Historical sociolinguistics: Origins, motivations, and paradigms. In Juan M. Hernández-Campoy & J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 22–40. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118257227.ch210.1002/9781118257227.ch2]Search in Google Scholar
[Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 2017. Historical sociolinguistics. Language change in Tudor and Stuart England (2nd edn). London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/978131547517210.4324/9781315475172]Search in Google Scholar
[Palander-Collin, Minna. 2010. Correspondence. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), The handbook of historical pragmatics, 651–678. Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110214284.7.65110.1515/9783110214284.7.651]Search in Google Scholar
[Palander-Collin, Minna, Minna Nevala & Arja Nurmi. 2009. The language of daily life in the history of English. Studying how macro meets micro. In Arja Nurmi, Minna Nevala & Minna Palander-Collin (eds), The language of daily life in England (1400–1800), 1–23. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.183.02pal10.1075/pbns.183.02pal]Search in Google Scholar
[Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 1996. Historical sociolinguistics. In Terttu Nevalainen & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (eds), Sociolinguistics and language history: Studies based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence, 11–37. Amsterdam: Rodopi.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reid, Euan. 1978. Social and stylistic variation in the speech of children: Some evidence from Edinburgh. In Peter Trudgill (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English, 158–171. London: Edward Arnold.]Search in Google Scholar
[Richmond, Colin. 1996. The Paston family in the fifteenth century. Vol. 2: Fastolf’s will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511582165]Search in Google Scholar
[Richmond, Colin. 2000. The Paston family in the fifteenth century. Vol. 3: Endings. Manchester: Manchester University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Richmond, Colin. 2002. The Paston family in the fifteenth century. Vol. 1: The first phase (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Richmond, Colin. 2004. Paston family (per. c. 1420–1504). Oxford dictionary of national biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/52791 [Accessed March 27, 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[Rickford, John & Penelope Eckert. 2001. Introduction. In Penelope Eckert & John Rickford (eds) Style and sociolinguistic variation, 1–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511613258.00110.1017/CBO9780511613258.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Rissanen, Matti. 1999. The language of law and the development of standard English. In Irma Taavitsainen, Gunnel Melchers & Päivi Pahta (eds), Writing in non-standard English, 189–204. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rissanen, Matti. 2000. Standardisation and the language of early statutes. In Laura Wright (ed.), The development of standard English 1300–1800: Theories, descriptions, conflicts, 117–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511551758.00810.1017/CBO9780511551758.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Romaine, Suzanne. 1978. Postvocalic /r/in Scottish English: Sound change in progress? In Peter Trudgill (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English, 144–157. London: Edward Arnold.]Search in Google Scholar
[Romaine, Suzanne. 1982. Socio-historical linguistics. Its status and methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511720130]Search in Google Scholar
[Romaine, Suzanne. 1998. Introduction. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. 2: 1776–1997, 1–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521264778.00210.1017/CHOL9780521264778.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Sairio, Anni. 2009. Language and letters of the Bluestocking network: Sociolinguistic issues in eighteenth-century epistolary English. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.]Search in Google Scholar
[Samuels, Michael Louis. 1963. Some applications of Middle English dialectology. English Studies 44. 81–94. DOI: 10.1080/0013838630859715510.1080/00138386308597155]Search in Google Scholar
[Schäfer, Ursula. 1996. The late Middle English Paston letters: A grammatical case in point for reconsidering philological methodologies. In Jürgen Klein & Dirk Vanderbeke (eds), Anglistentag 1995 Greifswald, 313–323. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783111714141-028]Search in Google Scholar
[Schiegg, Markus. 2016. Code-switching in lower-class writing: Autobiographies by patients from southern German psychiatric hospitals (1852–1931). Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 2(1). 47–81. DOI: 10.1515/jhsl-2016-000310.1515/jhsl-2016-0003]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider, Edgar W. 2002. Investigating variation and change in written documents. In Jack K. Chambers, Peter J. Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds), The handbook of language variation and change, 67–96. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9780470756591.ch310.1002/9780470756591.ch3]Search in Google Scholar
[Scragg, Donald G. 1974. A history of English spelling. Manchester: Manchester University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stenroos, Merja. 2004. Regional dialects and spelling conventions in late Middle English. Searches for (th) in the LALME data. In Marina Dossena & Roger Lass (eds), Methods and data in English historical dialectology, 257–285. Bern: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stenroos, Merja. 2006. A Middle English mess of fricative spellings: Reflections on thorn, yogh and their rivals. In Marcin Krygier & Liliana Sikorska (eds), To make his Englissh sweete upon his tonge, 9–36. Frankfurt a. Main: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[Taavitsainen, Irma. 2000. Scientific language and spelling standardisation 1375–1550. In Laura Wright (ed.), The development of standard English 1300–1800: Theories, descriptions, conflicts, 131-154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511551758.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Tanabe, Harumi. 1999. Composite predicates and phrasal verbs in the Paston Letters. In Laurel J. Brinton & Minoji Akimoto (eds), Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English, 97–132. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.47.36tan]Search in Google Scholar
[Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2005. Of social networks and linguistic influence: The language of Robert Lowth and his correspondents. International Journal of English Studies 5(1). 135–157.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2006. Eighteenth-century English letters: In search of the vernacular. Linguistica e Filologia 21. 113–146.]Search in Google Scholar
[Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ure, Jean. 1982. Introduction: Approaches to the study of register range. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 35. 5–24. DOI: 10.1515/ijsl.1982.35.510.1515/ijsl.1982.35.5]Search in Google Scholar
[Voeste, Anja. 2018. The self as a source. A peasant farmer’s letters from prison (1848–1852). Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 4(1). 97–118. DOI: 10.1515/jhsl-2017-001110.1515/jhsl-2017-0011]Search in Google Scholar
[Voitl, Herbert 1988. The history of voicing of initial fricatives in Southern England: A case of conflict between regional and social dialect. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical dialectology: Regional and social, 565–600. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110848137.56510.1515/9783110848137.565]Search in Google Scholar
[Wood, Johanna L. 2007. Text in context: A critical discourse analysis approach to Margaret Paston. In Terttu Nevalainen & Sanna Kaisa Tanskanen (eds), Letter writing, 47–71. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/bct.1.05woo10.1075/bct.1.05woo]Search in Google Scholar