Login
Registrieren
Passwort zurücksetzen
Veröffentlichen & Verteilen
Verlagslösungen
Vertriebslösungen
Themen
Allgemein
Altertumswissenschaften
Architektur und Design
Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, Buchwissenschaft
Biologie
Chemie
Geowissenschaften
Geschichte
Industrielle Chemie
Informatik
Jüdische Studien
Kulturwissenschaften
Kunst
Linguistik und Semiotik
Literaturwissenschaft
Materialwissenschaft
Mathematik
Medizin
Musik
Pharmazie
Philosophie
Physik
Rechtswissenschaften
Sozialwissenschaften
Sport und Freizeit
Technik
Theologie und Religion
Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Veröffentlichungen
Zeitschriften
Bücher
Konferenzberichte
Verlage
Blog
Kontakt
Suche
EUR
USD
GBP
Deutsch
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Warenkorb
Home
Zeitschriften
Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
Band 44 (2022): Heft 1 (March 2022)
Uneingeschränkter Zugang
Importance of seismic wave frequency in FEM-based dynamic stress and displacement calculations of the earth slope
Krzysztof Fuławka
Krzysztof Fuławka
,
Anna Kwietniak
Anna Kwietniak
,
Vera Lay
Vera Lay
und
Izabela Jaśkiewicz-Proć
Izabela Jaśkiewicz-Proć
| 09. Feb. 2022
Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
Band 44 (2022): Heft 1 (March 2022)
Über diesen Artikel
Vorheriger Artikel
Nächster Artikel
Zusammenfassung
Artikel
Figuren und Tabellen
Referenzen
Autoren
Artikel in dieser Ausgabe
Vorschau
PDF
Zitieren
Teilen
Article Category:
Original Study
Online veröffentlicht:
09. Feb. 2022
Seitenbereich:
82 - 96
Eingereicht:
22. Juni 2021
Akzeptiert:
16. Dez. 2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2022-0002
Schlüsselwörter
Slope stability
,
Numerical analysis
,
Seismic load
,
Frequency analysis
© 2022 Krzysztof Fuławka et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1
Comparison of spectrograms for mining-induced high-energy tremors with energy of 1.9 × 109 J (left) and 1.2 × 107 J (right).
Figure 2
The dominant frequency content of LGCB mining-induced tremors in relation to their epicentral distance and energy (over 430 entries, vertical and horizontal components were studied).
Figure 3
The spectral amplitude characteristic of harmonic signals used in FEM dynamic analysis.
Figure 4
Geometry of slope used for numerical simulation.
Figure 5
Maximum element size in the dynamic model according to Kuhlemeyer and Lysmer law (blue line) and element size used for the purposes of this analysis (red bars).
Figure 6
Analysed variants of seismic load direction.
Figure 7
Matrix of numerical scenarios used for the presented research.
Figure 8
The calculated absolute values of displacement (top) and shear stress (down) changes at the base of the analysed slope depending on the used frequency.
Figure 9
The maximum calculated value of total displacement (top) and shear stress (bottom) at the base of the slope for all 180 cases.
Figure 10
The RSM surface map of the relation between dominant frequency, slope angle and displacement (left) and shear stress (right) for scenarios in which the direction of seismic load is the same as the direction of slope failure.
Figure 11
The RSM surface map of the relation between dominant frequency, slope angle and displacement (left) and shear stress (right) for scenarios in which the direction of seismic load is opposite to the direction of slope failure.
Material parameters used for numerical simulation.
Parameter
Unit weight
Young modulus
Poisson ratio
Tensile strength
Cohesion
Friction angle
Dilation angle
Unit
kN/m
3
kPa
-
kPa
kPa
°
°
Value
19
100,000
0.4
5
5
38
0