This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022. Rome: FAO, 2022.Search in Google Scholar
Torres M. D., Kraan S., Domínguez H. Seaweed biorefinery. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology 2019:18(2):335–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-019-09496-ySearch in Google Scholar
Michalak I., Chojnacka K. Seaweeds as a Component of the Human Diet. Algae Biomass: Characteristics and Applications 2018:57–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74703-3_6Search in Google Scholar
Singh C. B., et al. Fortification of Extruded Product with Brown Seaweed (Sargassum tenerrimum) and Its Process Optimization by Response Surface Methodology. Waste Biomass Valorization 2018:9(5):755–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12649-017-9831-2Search in Google Scholar
Thomas N. V., Kim S. K. Beneficial Effects of Marine Algal Compounds in Cosmeceuticals. Marine Drugs 2013:11(1):146–164. https://doi.org/10.3390/MD11010146Search in Google Scholar
Abdelwahab R. Therapeutic and Pharmaceutical Application of Seaweeds. Biotechnological Applications of Seaweeds. NY, USA: Nova Science Publisher, 2017.Search in Google Scholar
mac Monagail M., Morrison L. The seaweed resources of Ireland: a twenty-first century perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 2020:32(2):1287–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-020-02067-7Search in Google Scholar
mac Monagail M., et al. Sustainable harvesting of wild seaweed resources. European Journal of Phycology 2017:52(4):371–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2017.1365273Search in Google Scholar
McLachlan J. L. General principles of on-shore cultivation of seaweeds: effects of light on production. Hydrobiologia 1991:221(1):125–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00028369Search in Google Scholar
Zertuche-González J. A., et al. Seasonal and interannual production of sea lettuce (Ulva sp.) in outdoor cultures based on commercial size ponds. World Aquaculture Society 2021:52(5):1047–1058. https://doi.org/10.1111/JWAS.12773Search in Google Scholar
Vinuganesh A., et al. Seasonal Changes in the Biochemical Constituents of Green Seaweed Chaetomorpha antennina from Covelong, India. Biomolecules 2022:12(10):1475. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12101475Search in Google Scholar
Teresa M., Gómez C., Lähteenmäki-Uutela A. European and National Regulations on Seaweed Cultivation and Harvesting. Helsinki, 2021.Search in Google Scholar
Marine Scotland Directorate. Effects of Harvesting on Ecological Function. Wild seaweed harvesting: strategic environmental assessment - environmental report. Edinburgh: Scottish Government, 2016.Search in Google Scholar
Hafting J. T. et al. Prospects and challenges for industrial production of seaweed bioactives. J Phycol 2015:51(5):821–837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12326Search in Google Scholar
García-Poza S., et al. The evolution road of seaweed aquaculture: Cultivation technologies and the industry 4.0. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020:17(18):1–42. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186528Search in Google Scholar
Hafting J. T., Critchley A. T., Cornish M. L., Hubley S. A., Archibald A. F. On-land cultivation of functional seaweed products for human usage. J Appl Phycol 2012:24(3):385–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-011-9720-1Search in Google Scholar
ISO 14044:2006, Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization. International Organization for Standardization, 2006. [Online]. [Accessed: 02.01.2023]. Available: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:14044:ed-1:v1:enSearch in Google Scholar
ISO. ISO 14044:2006 – Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2006.Search in Google Scholar
Oirschot R. van, Thomas J. B. E., Gröndahl F., Fortuin K. P. J., Brandenburg W., Potting J. Explorative environmental life cycle assessment for system design of seaweed cultivation and drying. Algal Res 2017:27:43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2017.07.025Search in Google Scholar
Taelman S. E., et al. Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of two seaweed cultivation systems in North West Europe with a focus on quantifying sea surface occupation. Algal Research 2015:11:173–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2015.06.018Search in Google Scholar
Thomas J. B. E., et al. A comparative environmental life cycle assessment of hatchery, cultivation, and preservation of the kelp Saccharina latissimi. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2021:78(1):451–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaa112Search in Google Scholar
Seghetta M., et al. Life cycle assessment of macroalgal biorefinery for the production of ethanol, proteins and fertilizers – A step towards a regenerative bioeconomy. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016:137:1158–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.195Search in Google Scholar
Alvarado-Morales M., et al. Life cycle assessment of biofuel production from brown seaweed in Nordic conditions. Bioresource Technologies 2013:129:92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2012.11.029Search in Google Scholar
Langlois J., et al. Life cycle assessment of biomethane from offshore-cultivated seaweed. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 2012:6(4):387–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/BBB.1330Search in Google Scholar
Jung K. A., et al. Opportunity and challenge of seaweed bioethanol based on life cycle CO2 assessment. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy 2017:36(1):200–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/EP.12446Search in Google Scholar
Guinée J. B., Huppes G., Heijungs R. Developing an LCA guide for decision support. Environmental Management and Health 2001:12(3):301–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09566160110392416Search in Google Scholar
Groen E. A., et al. Sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector 2014:482–488.Search in Google Scholar
Wernet G., et al. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2016:21:1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8Search in Google Scholar
Goedkoop M., et al. Introduction to LCA with SimaPro Title: Introduction to LCA with SimaPro. Amersfoort: Pre, 2016.Search in Google Scholar
Fazio S., et al. Guide for EF compliant data sets. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020.Search in Google Scholar
Ahlgren E. Compilation of Life Cycle Assessments of Cultivated Brown Seaweed A recalculation of Life Cycle Inventories. Stockholm: KTH, 2021.Search in Google Scholar
Lamouroux J. V. Essai sur les genres de la famille des Thalassiophytes non articulées. (Furcellaria lumbricalis (Hudson). Essay on the genera of the non-articulated Thalassiophyta family). Paris, 1813. (In French).Search in Google Scholar
Kersen P., et al. Effect of abiotic environment on the distribution of the attached and drifting red algae Furcellaria lumbricalis in the Estonian coastal sea. Estonian Journal of Ecology 2009:58(4):245–258. https://doi.org/10.3176/eco.2009.4.01Search in Google Scholar
HELCOM. Furcellaria lumbricalis Species Information Sheet. Bohn: Bundesamt für Naturschutz, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
Vetik OÜ. [Online]. [Accessed 20.03.2023]. Available: https://vetik.eu/#aboutSearch in Google Scholar
Hyndla. [Online]. [Accessed 20.03.2023]. Available: https://hyndla.is/englishSearch in Google Scholar
Mantri V. A., et al. Feasibility of farming the agarose-yielding red alga Gracilaria dura using tube-net cultivation in the open sea along the Gujarat coast of NW India. Applied Phycology 2020:1(1):12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/26388081.2019.1648181Search in Google Scholar
Edwards M. D., Dring M. J. Open-sea cultivation trial of the red alga, Palmaria palmata from seeded tetraspores in Strangford Lough, Northern Ireland. Aquaculture 2011:317(1–4):203–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.04.007Search in Google Scholar
Seppälä J., et al. Country-dependent characterisation factors for acidification and terrestrial eutrophication based on accumulated exceedance as an impact category indicator. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2006:11(6):403–416. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2005.06.215Search in Google Scholar
Posch M., et al. The role of atmospheric dispersion models and ecosystem sensitivity in the determination of characterisation factors for acidifying and eutrophying emissions in LCIA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2008:13(6):477–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0025-9Search in Google Scholar
Uniworkboats SIA. Fishing trawler – ST-50 – inboard / aluminium. 2022 [Online]. [Accessed 23.02.2023[. Available: https://www.nauticexpo.com/prod/uniworkboats-sia/product-66044-539847.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Piccinno F., et al. From laboratory to industrial scale: a scale-up framework for chemical processes in life cycle assessment studies. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016:135:1085–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.164Search in Google Scholar
Chowdhury M. S., et al. An overview of solar photovoltaic panels’ end-of-life material recycling. Energy Strategy Reviews 2020:27:100431. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESR.2019.100431Search in Google Scholar
Lin S., et al. Life cycle assessment of the use of marine biocides in antifouling paint - A comparison of the environmental profiles between conventional copper-based and innovative Selektope paint. Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology, 2014.Search in Google Scholar
Barcelo L., et al. Cement and carbon emissions. Materials and Structures 2014:47(6):1055–1065. https://doi.org/10.1617/S11527-013-0114-5Search in Google Scholar
Troell M., et al. Farming the Ocean–Seaweeds as a Quick Fix for the Climate? Reviews in Fisheries Science and Aquaculture 2022:31(3):285–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2022.2048792Search in Google Scholar
Kotta J., et al. Assessing the potential for sea-based macroalgae cultivation and its application for nutrient removal in the Baltic Sea. Science of the Total Environment 2022:839:156230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156230Search in Google Scholar
Xiao X., et al. Nutrient removal from Chinese coastal waters by large-scale seaweed aquaculture. Scientific Reports 2017:7:46613. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46613Search in Google Scholar