[
ABDEL-FATTAH, M. A. K. (2014). Factors influencing adoption and diffusion of e-government services. In 14th European Conference on e-Government (ECEG 2014) (pp. 1–9). Academic Conferences and Publishing International Ltd., Reading.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
AL-MUTAWKKIL, A., HESMATI, A., & HWANG, J. (2009). Development of telecommunication and broadcasting infrastructure indices at the global level. Telecommunications Policy, 33(3-4), 176–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2008.12.00810.1016/j.telpol.2008.12.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ARCHIBUGI, D., & COCO, A. (2005). Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: A survey and a menu for choice. Research Policy, 34(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.00210.1016/j.respol.2004.12.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
AYANSO, A., CHATTERJEE, D., & CHO, D. I. (2011). E-Government readiness index: A methodology and analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 28(4), 522–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.02.00410.1016/j.giq.2011.02.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BANNISTER, F. (2007). The curse of the benchmark: an assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/002085230707795910.1177/0020852307077959
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BARRENECHEA, M. J., & JENKINS, T. (2014). e-Government or Out of Government. Waterloo, Ontario: Open Text Corporation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BARTLETT, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 3(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BILLON, M., MARCO, R., & LERA-LOPEZ, F. (2009). Disparities in ICT adoption: A multidimensional approach to study the cross-country digital divide. Telecommunications Policy, 33(10-11), 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2009.08.00610.1016/j.telpol.2009.08.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BOGDANOSKA-JOVANOVSKA, M. (2016). Demarcation of the field of e-government assessment. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 12(48), 19–36.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CHANG, Y., KIM, H., WONG, S. F., & PARK, M. C. (2015). A comparison of the digital divide across three countries with different development indices. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 23(4), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.201510010310.4018/JGIM.2015100103
]Search in Google Scholar
[
COHEN, J., COHEN, P., WEST, S. G., & AIKEN, L. S. (2003). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CRUZ-JESUS, F., OLIVEIRA, T., & BACAO, F. (2012). Digital divide across the European Union. Information & Management, 49(6), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.09.00310.1016/j.im.2012.09.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CRUZ-JESUS, F., OLIVEIRA, T., BACAO, F., & IRANI, Z. (2017). Assessing the pattern between economic and digital development of countries. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(4), 835–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9634-110.1007/s10796-016-9634-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CRUZ-JESUS, F., OLIVEIRA, T., & BACAO, F. (2018). The global digital divide: Evidence and drivers. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 26(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.201804010110.4018/JGIM.2018040101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CUERVO, M. R. V., & MENENDEZ, A. J. L. (2006). A multivariate framework for the analysis of the digital divide: Evidence for the European Union-15. Information & Management, 43(6), 756–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.00110.1016/j.im.2006.05.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DODEL, M., & AGUIRRE, F. (2018). Digital inequalities’ impact on progressive stages of e-government development. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 459–463). ACM, New York. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209415.320947510.1145/3209415.3209475
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DOONG, S. H., & HO, S. C. (2012). The impact of ICT development on the global digital divide. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(5), 518–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2012.02.00210.1016/j.elerap.2012.02.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DUTTA, S, & LANVIN, B. (Eds.) (2020). The Network Readiness Index 2020: Accelerating Digital Transformation in a post-COVID Global Economy. Washington: Portulans Institute.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ELENA-BUCEA, A., CRUZ-JESUS, F., OLIVEIRA, T., & COELHO, P. S. (2020). Assessing the role of age, education, gender and income on the digital divide: Evidence for the European Union. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10012-910.1007/s10796-020-10012-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2015). Monitoring the Digital Economy & Society 2016 - 2021. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HANAFIZADEH, M. R., HANAFIZADEH, P., & BOHLIN, E. (2013). Digital divide and e-readiness: Trends and gaps. International Journal of E-Adoption (IJEA), 5(3), 30–75. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijea.201307010310.4018/ijea.2013070103
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HELBIG, N., DAWES, S. S., MULKI, F. H., HRDINOVA, J. L., COOK, M. E., & EDWARDS, T. (2009a). International Digital Government Research: A Reconnaissance Study (1994-2008). Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HELBIG, N., GIL-GARCIA, J. R., & FERRO, E. (2009b). Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.05.00410.1016/j.giq.2008.05.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION. (2018). Measuring the Information Society Report 2018 – Volume 1. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JAEGER, P. T., & THOMPSON, K. M. (2003). E-government around the world: Lessons, challenges, and future directions. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 389–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2003.08.00110.1016/j.giq.2003.08.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JANSSEN, M. (2010). Measuring and benchmarking the back-end of e-government: A participative self-assessment approach. In Proceedings of the 9th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference (EGOV 2010) (pp. 156–167). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14799-9_1410.1007/978-3-642-14799-9_14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KAISER, H. F. (1970). A second-generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0229181710.1007/BF02291817
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KASSEN, M. (2014). Globalization of e-government: open government as a global agenda; benefits, limitations and ways forward. Information Development, 30(1), 51–58. DOI: 10.1177/026666691247362010.1177/0266666912473620
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KRISHNAN, S., TEO, T. S., & LIM, J. (2013). E-Participation and e-government maturity: A global perspective. In Proceedings of the WG 8.6 International Working Conference on Transfer and Diffusion of IT (TDIT 2013) (pp. 420–435). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38862-0_2610.1007/978-3-642-38862-0_26
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LACHANA, Z., ALEXOPOULOS, C., LOUKIS, E., & CHARALABIDIS, Y. (2018). Identifying the different generations of egovernment: An analysis framework. In The 12th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS) (pp. 1–13). Corfu, Greece.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LAKKA, S., STAMATI, T., MICHALAKELIS, C., & ANAGNOSTOPOULOS, D. (2015). Cross-national analysis of the relation of eGovernment maturity and OSS growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 99, 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.02410.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LINDERS, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.00310.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LNĚNIČKA, M. (2015). E-government development index and its comparison in the EU member states. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice - Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration, 22(34), 75–87.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LNĚNIČKA, M., & KOMÁRKOVÁ, J. (2019). Big and open linked data analytics ecosystem: Theoretical background and essential elements. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.00410.1016/j.giq.2018.11.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LNĚNIČKA, M., MÁCHOVÁ, R., & KOMÁRKOVÁ, J. (2015). Cloud e-government index as a new benchmarking framework for the public sector. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference Current Trends in Public Sector Research (pp. 29–37). Masaryk University, Brno
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LNĚNIČKA, M., & NIKIFOROVA, A. (2021). Transparency-by-design: What is the role of open data portals?. Telematics and Informatics, 61, 101605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.10160510.1016/j.tele.2021.101605
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MÁCHOVÁ, R., & LNĚNIČKA, M. (2015). Reframing E-government development indices with respect to new trends in ICT. Review of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 383–412. https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-002710.1515/revecp-2015-0027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MÁCHOVÁ, R., & LNĚNIČKA, M. (2016). Modelling e-government development through the years using cluster analysis. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government (JeDEM), 8(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v8i1.41210.29379/jedem.v8i1.412
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MÁCHOVÁ, R., KOMÁRKOVÁ, J., KOPÁČKOVÁ, H., & LNĚNIČKA, M. (2018). Benchmarking smart e-government development: Insights from a national perspective. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice - Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration, 25(42), 152–164.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MISHRA, D., AKMAN, I., AND MISHRA, A. (2014). Theory of reasoned action application for green information technology acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.03010.1016/j.chb.2014.03.030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MOHAMMED, F., & IBRAHIM, O. (2013). Refining e-government readiness index by cloud computing. Jurnal Teknologi, 65(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.175910.11113/jt.v65.1759
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NAM, T. (2014). Determining the type of e-government use. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.09.00610.1016/j.giq.2013.09.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NARDO, M. et al. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OJO, A., JANOWSKI, T., & ESTEVEZ, E. (2011). Building theoretical foundations for electronic governance benchmarking. In Proceedings of the 10th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference (EGOV 2011) (pp. 13–25). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22878-0_210.1007/978-3-642-22878-0_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OSBORNE, J. W., & COSTELLO, A. B. (2009). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pan-Pacific Management Review, 12(2), 131–146.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OXFORD INSIGHTS. (2020). Government AI Readiness Index 2020. Ottawa: IDRC.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RORISSA, A., DEMISSIE, D., & PARDO, T. (2011). Benchmarking e-government: A comparison of frameworks for computing e-government index and ranking. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.09.00610.1016/j.giq.2010.09.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SISKOS, E., ASKOUNIS, D., & PSARRAS, J. (2014). Multicriteria decision support for global e-government evaluation. Omega, 46, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.02.00110.1016/j.omega.2014.02.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
STOLTZFUS, K. (2005). Motivations for implementing e-government: An investigation of the global phenomenon. In Proceedings of the 2005 national conference on Digital government research (pp. 333–338). Digital Government Society of North America.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UNITED NATIONS. (2014). United Nations e-Government Survey 2014: E-Government for the Future We Want. New York: UN Publishing Section.10.18356/73688f37-en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UNITED NATIONS. (2016). United Nations e-Government Survey 2016: E-Government in Support of Sustainable Development. New York: UN Publishing Section.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UNITED NATIONS. (2018). United Nations e-Government Survey 2018: Gearing E-Government to support transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies. New York: UN Publishing Section.10.18356/d54b9179-en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UNITED NATIONS. (2020). United Nations e-Government Survey 2020: Digital Government in the Decade of Action for Sustainable Development. New York: UN Publishing Section.10.18356/8bdf045f-en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VENTURA, E., & SATORRA, A. (2015). A multiple indicator model for panel data: An application to ICT area-level variation. Telecommunications Policy, 39(10), 830–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.07.00210.1016/j.telpol.2015.07.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VICENTE, M. R., & LOPEZ, A. J. (2011). Assessing the regional digital divide across the European union-27. Telecommunications Policy, 35(3), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2010.12.01310.1016/j.telpol.2010.12.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WASEDA UNIVERSITY. (2020). The 15th WASEDA International Digital Government Rankings Report. Tokyo: The Institute of D-Government at Waseda University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WIMMER, M. A., PEREIRA, G. V., RONZHYN, A., & SPITZER, V. (2020). Transforming government by leveraging disruptive technologies: Identification of research and training needs. JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 12(1), 87–113. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v12i1.59410.29379/jedem.v12i1.594
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. (2016). The Global Information Technology Report 2016: Innovating in the Digital Economy. Geneva: SRO-Kundig.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
YERA, A., ARBELAITZ, O., JAUREGUI, O., & MUGUERZA, J. (2020). Characterization of e-Government adoption in Europe. PLoS ONE, 15(4), e0231585. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.023158510.1371/journal.pone.0231585
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ZAHRAN, D. I., AL-NUAIM, H. A., RUTTER, M. J., & BENYON, D. (2015). A critical analysis of e-government evaluation models at national and local municipal levels. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 13(1), 28–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ZHANG, H., XU, X., & XIAO, J. (2014). Diffusion of e-government: A literature review and directions for future directions. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 631-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.01310.1016/j.giq.2013.10.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ZHAO, F., COLLIER, A., & DENG, H. (2014). A multidimensional and integrative approach to study global digital divide and e-government development. Information Technology & People, 27(1), 38–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2013-002210.1108/ITP-01-2013-0022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ZISSIS, D., & LEKKAS, D. (2011). Securing e-government and e-voting with an open cloud computing architecture. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.01010.1016/j.giq.2010.05.010
]Search in Google Scholar