[
Arbaugh, J.B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the Community of Inquiry (COI) framework: An exploratory study. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 37-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bandura A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2), 248-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beatty, B. (2019). Hybrid-flexible course design. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/hyflex
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carlson, R., Dwyer, K., Bingham, S., Cruz, A., Prisbell, M., & Fuz, D. (2006). Connected classroom climate and communication apprehension: Correlations and implications for the basic course. Basic Communication Course Annual, 18, 1-27.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2014). The evaluation of physical learning environments; A critical review of the literature. Learning Environments Research, 17 (1), 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9149-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dwyer, K., Bingham, S., Carlson, R., Prisbell, M., Cruz, A., & Fuz, D. (2004). Communication and climate: Development of the connected classroom climate inventory. Communication Research Reports, 21, 264-272.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fraser, B. (2018). Milestones in the evolution of the learning environments field over the past three decades. In D. Zandvliet, & B. Frasier (Eds.), Thirty years of Learning Environments: Looking back and looking forward (pp.1-19). Boston: MA: Brill Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004387720_001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garrison, E.R, Anderson, T., & Archer W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conference in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2. 87-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gascoigne, C. (2012a). Classroom climate and student-to-student interaction in the post-secondary French classroom. The French Review, 85(4), 717-727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/tfr.2012.0303
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gascoigne, C. (2012b). Toward an understanding of the relationship between classroom climate and performance in postsecondary French: An application of the classroom climate inventory. Foreign Language Annals, 45(2), 193-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01186.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gascoigne, C. (2022) Reemerging spaces: Examining classroom climate in the Hyflex Realm. The Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 25,1, 1-18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laforune, A.M., & Lakhal, S. (2019). Differences in student perceptions of the Community of Inquiry in a blended synchronous delivery mode. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 45(3), 1-19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mcarthur, J. (2015). Matching instructors and spaces of learning: The impact of classroom space on behavioral, affective, and cognitive learning. Journal of Learning Spaces http://libjournal.uncg.edu/jls/article/view/766
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McBrien, J., Cheng, R., & Jones, P. (2009). Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.605
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miller, A., Sellnow, D., & Strawser, M. (2021). Pandemic pedagogy challenges and opportunities: instruction communication in remote, HyFlex, and BlendFlex courses. Communication Education, 70(2), 202-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1857418
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Omodan, B. I., & Tsotetsi, C. T. (2020, June). Decolonization of knowledge-construction in university classrooms: The Place of social constructivism. African Journal of Gender, Society and Development, 9(2), 183+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A673002744/AONE?u=txshracd2590&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=52950a6d
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Owston, R. (2013). Blended learning policy and implementation: Introduction to the special issue. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.03.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Romero-Hill, E., & Ripine, C. (2021). Hybrid flexible instruction: Exploring faculty preparedness. Online Learning Journal, 25(3), 289-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i3.2426
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schneider, B., M., Nebel, S., Schnaubert, L., & Rey, G. D. (2022). The Cognitive-Affective-Social Theory of Learning in digital Environments (CASTLE). Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 1–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09626-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Semin, G., & Smith, E. (2013). Socially situated cognition in perspective. Social Cognition 31(2), 125-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/soco.2013.31.2.125
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shea, P. (2006). A study of students’ sense of learning community in online learning environments. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks (10)1, 35+, https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A284325460/AONE?u=txshracd2590&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=8fa9c1e6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721-1731. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, E., & Semin, G. (2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. Advances in Experimental Psychology, 36 53-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36002-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stanton, A., Zandvliet, D., & Dhaliwal, R. (2018). Impacts of learning environments on student well-being in higher education. In D. Zandvliet, & B. Frasier (Eds.), Thirty years of Learning Environments: Looking back and looking forward (pp.141-150). Boston: MA: Brill Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004387720_008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szeto, E., & Cheng, A. (2016). Towards a framework of interaction in a blended synchronous learning environment: What effects are there on students’ social presence experience? Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 487-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.881391
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922461.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tinto, V. (2012). Completing College: Rethinking Institutional Action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226804545.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vesely, P., Bloom, L., & Sherlock, J. (2007). Key elements of building online community: Comparing faculty and student perceptions. MERLOT Journal of Online Teaching and Learning, 3(3), 234-246.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and Language (Translation newly revised and edited / by Alex Kozulin.). MIT Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/11193-000
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walker, C. L., & Shore, B. M. (2015). Understanding classroom roles in inquiry education: Linking role theory and social constructivism to the concept of role diversification. SAGE Open, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015607584
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zandvliet, D. (2018). Looking back and looking forward. In D. Zandvliet, & B. Frasier (Eds.), Thirty years of Learning Environments: Looking back and looking forward (pp.59-71). Boston: MA: Brill Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004387720_004
]Search in Google Scholar