[1. Adler, M.J. (2000) “Dialectics” Routledge Press, London]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Ayer. A. J. (1984) “Philosophy in the Twentieth Century”. London: Unwin paperbacks Pub.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Bertell, O & Tony, S. (2008) “Dialectics for the New Century” London. England, Palgrave Macmillan, Pub.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Donald, L. (2003) (Eng. Trans.) “Phenomenology of Perception:- Maurice Ponty” London, Routledge Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Evan, T. (2007) “Autopoiesis: The organization of the living”: Mind in life: Biology Phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Harvard Univ. Press Boston USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Fisher, G. & Giaccardi, E. (2006) “Metadesign”. A Framework for the Future of End use development”. In Lieberman, F.P & Wulf. V. (eds.) Kluwer Acad. Pub. Dordrecht. Netherlands.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Giaccardi, E (2003) “Principles of Metadesign: Processes and levels of Cocreation in the New design space. Kluwer Acad. Publishers. Dordrecht. Netherlands.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Goosseff, K. A. (2010). Autopoiesis and Meaning: A biological approach to Bakhtins super addressee. Journal of Organizational Change Management, University of Boston Press. Massachusetts. USA.10.1108/09534811011031319]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Hiesinger, K.B & Marcus, G. H (1993). “Landmarks of Twentieth century Designs” New York. Abbeville Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Howard, L. I. W. (1989) “Hegel, Heraclitus, and Marxs Dialetic”. Harvester wheat sheaf, Pub.London.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Ira, G. (1986) “Dialectical materialism”: Its Laws, Categories and Practice, Petras Press NY. New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Kimbell, R. (2005) “Assessing Design innovation in Technology Education in New Perspectives, Research, Assessment and Curriculum development (eds) Lars Lindstrom Vol 17. Stockholm Inst. Of Ed Press/pub]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Livingston, N. (1990) “Between Science and Literature”: An Introduction to Autopoietics. Univ of Illinois Press. Illinois. USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Lucie-Smith, E. (2001) “History of Industrial Design”, Oxford. Phaidon Press. UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Michel, H. (2008) “Material Phenomenology”. Fordham University Press. New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Mitchel, C. T. (1993) “Redefining Designing” New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold Pub.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Noblet, J. (ed) (1993) “Industrial Design: Reflection of a century”. Flammarion /APCI. Pub. Paris.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. O’Brien, J. Millis, B. Cohen, M. (2008) “The Design Education course Syllabus”. San Francisco: Wiley and Sons pub.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Petroski, H. (1994) “Design paradigms; case Histories of Error and Judgement” in Eng. Design. Newtown Press. N. Jersey USA.10.1017/CBO9780511805073]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Pierre, T (1962) “What is phenomenology”, Chicago, Quadrangle Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Smith, D. W. & Thomasson, A. L. (2005) (eds) “Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind”, New York, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272457.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Spramzi, M. (2011) “The Art of Dialectics between Dialogue and Rhetoric” The Aristotelian Tradition, Philadelphia USA, John Benjamin’s Pub.10.1075/cvs.9]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Vassao, C. A. (2010) “Metadesign tools, Strategies and ethics towards complexity” Blutcher Pub. Sao Paulo. Briazil.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Wake, W. (2000) “Design paradigms”. A source book for creative visualization. Adwark pub. London.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Walker, A.J. (1989) “Design History and History of Design”, London. Pluto Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Wood, J. (2007) “Win-win: synergy tools for metadesigners”. In Designing for the 21st Century, Interdisciplinary questions and insights. (Ed.) Thomas Inns. Gower Pub. London.]Search in Google Scholar
