[1. Bognar, B., Gajger, V., Ivic V. (2015). Constructivist E-learning in Higher Education. Faculty of Teacher Education University of Zagreb Conference - Researching Paradigms of Childhood and Education - UFZG2015, Opatija, Croatia.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Clements, D.H., Battista, M.T. (2009). Constructivist Learning and Teaching. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc. www.nctm.org.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Cobb, P. (1988). The Tension between Theories of Learning and Instruction in Mathematics Education. Educational Psychologist 23 (1988): 87–103.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Cortese, A.D. (2003). The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Planning for Higher Education, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp 385-402.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. David, Orr. (2004). Earth in Mind: On Education, Environment, and the Human prospect,]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Fernando, A., Lopez, G., Manrique, D., Vines, J.M. (2005). An instructional model for webbased e-learning education with a blended learning process approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 36, No. 219.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Gibbs, G. (1992). Improving the quality of student learning. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Glasersfeld, Ernst von (1987). Constructivism in Education. In: T.Husen and T. Neville Postlethwaite (eds) The International Encyclopedia of Education. Research and Studies (pp. 162-163). Supplementary Volume 1. Oxford: Pergamon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Glasersfeld, Ernst von. (1989). Preliminaries to any theory of representation. In C. Janvier (Eds.) Problem of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp 3-7). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Eriboum Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Havighurst, R.J. (1972). Developmental tasks and education. (3rd.ed) New York: McKay.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Hussain, I., & Sultan, S. (2010). Learning by doing: Outcomes of teaching a research course through group activities. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Computer Science Education: Innovation & Technology (CSEIT) 2010, Singapore City: Global Science and Technology Forum, 6-7 December 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Jonassen, D. (1991). Objectivism vs. Constructivism. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1991, 39(30), 1991. 5-14.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Li, W. (2001). Constructivist learning systems: A new paradigm. International Conference on Advanced Learning Techniques, Madison, 6-8 August 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Parsons, R., Hinson, S.L. & Sardo-Brow, D. (2002). Education Psychology: A Practitioner - Research Approach–Cengage Learning Asia; 1st edition (May 31, 2002), p.536.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Piaget, J. (1977). Psychoanalysis in its relations with child psychology. In H.E.Gruber Jahoda & JJ.Vonche (Eds.), The essential Piaget (pp.55-59). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Pritchard, A., & Woollard, J. (2010). Psychology for the classroom: Constructivism and social learning. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Serve, V. (1957). Teaching mathematics in secondary schools. Mathematical Education, Vol.1, pp. 22-32. (in Russian).]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Schuman, L. (1996). Perspectives on instruction. Retrieved 01/03/18 from http://edweb.sdsu.edu/courses/edtec540/Perspectives/Perspectives.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. UNESCO. (2008). Education for All Global Monitoring Report. Retrieved 01/03/18 from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001547/154743e.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
