Automated determination of chest characteristics of Indonesians as the basis of chest dosimetrical phantom design

1. Gonzalez AJ. Current status on the global levels of radiation exposure. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. 2014;16-54.Search in Google Scholar

2. Hiswara E, Kartikasari D. Dosis pasien pada pemeriksaan rutin sinar-x radiologi diagnostik. Indonesian Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 2015;16:71-84.10.17146/jstni.2015.16.2.2359Search in Google Scholar

3. Salat D, Nikodemova D. Patient doses and image quality in digital chest radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;129:147-149.10.1093/rpd/ncn03218321878Search in Google Scholar

4. Paydar R, Takavar A, Kardan MR, Babakhani A, Deevband MR, Saber S. Patient effective dose evaluation for chest X-ray examination in three digital radiography centers. Iran J Radiat Res. 2012;10:139-143.Search in Google Scholar

5. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Image quality in chest radiography. ICRU Report 70. 2003.Search in Google Scholar

6. Moey SF, Fatin Naimah MA. Evaluation of the influence of exposure index on image quality and radiation dose. Iran J Med Phys 2019;16:294-299Search in Google Scholar

7. Adhikari SR. Effect and application of ionization radiation (X-ray) in living organism. Kaski. The Himalaya Physics. 2012;3:89-92.10.3126/hj.v3i0.7315Search in Google Scholar

8. Rana BS, Kumar S, Sandhu IS, Singh NP. Dosimetry of adult and pediatric patients for common digital radiography examinations. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2018;179:349-357.10.1093/rpd/ncx29329342278Search in Google Scholar

9. Sandborg M, Tingberg A, Ullman G, Dance DR, Alm Carlsson G. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages. Med Phys. 2006;33:4169-4175.10.1118/1.236287117153395Search in Google Scholar

10. Komite Akreditasi Rumah Sakit. Standar nasional akreditasi rumah sakit edisi 1. 2017.Search in Google Scholar

11. Martin CJ. Radiation dosimetry for diagnostic medical exposures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;128:389–412.10.1093/rpd/ncm49518375947Search in Google Scholar

12. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Phantoms and computational models in therapy, diagnosis and protection. ICRU Publication 48 (Oxford: Pergamon Press). 1992.Search in Google Scholar

13. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Standardized methods for measuring diagnostic X-ray exposures. AAPM Report No 31. 1990.Search in Google Scholar

14. American National Standard Institute. Method for the sensitometry of medical X-ray screen-film-processing systems. American National Standard Institute (PH2/43). New York. 1982.Search in Google Scholar

15. Conway BJ, Butler PF, Duff JE, et al. Beam quality independent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposure from X-ray automatic exposure controlled chest examinations. Med Phys. 1984;11:827–832.10.1118/1.5956116513889Search in Google Scholar

16. Pina DR, Duarte SB, Ghilardi Netto T, Morceli J. Phantom development for radiographic image optimization of chest, skull and pelvis examination for nonstandard patient. Appl Radiat Isot. 2009;67(1):61–69.10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.07.01818783956Search in Google Scholar

17. Gray JE. Quality control in diagnostic imaging: A quality control cookbook. Baltimor Md: University Park Press.1983.Search in Google Scholar

18. Conway BJ, Duff JE, Fewell TR, Jennings RJ, Rothenberg LN, Fleischman RC. A patient-equivalent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposures from automatic exposure controlled X-ray examinations of the abdomen and lumbosacral spine. Med Phys. 1990;17(3):448–453.10.1118/1.5964832385202Search in Google Scholar

19. Conway BJ, Suleiman OH, Rueter FG, Mccrohan JL. Patient equivalent attenuation phantoms. Radiat Prot Dosimetry.1992;43(1-4):123–125.10.1093/rpd/43.1-4.123Search in Google Scholar

20. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: Reference values. ICRP Publication 89 (Oxford: Pergamon press). 2003.Search in Google Scholar

21. Alves AFF, Miranda JRA, Bacchim Neto FA, Duarte SB, Pina DR. Construction of pediatric homogeneous phantoms for optimization of chest and skull radiographs. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(8):1579-1585.10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.05.01526044295Search in Google Scholar

22. Chotas HG, Floyd CE Jr, Johnson GA, Ravin CE. Quality control phantom for digital chest radiography. Radiology. 1997;202(1):111-116.10.1148/radiology.202.1.89881998988199Search in Google Scholar

23. Jones AK, Simon TA, Bolch WE, Holman MM, Hintenlang DE. Tomographic physical phantom of the newborn child with real-time dosimetry I. Methods and techniques for construction. Med Phys. 2006;33:3274-3282.10.1118/1.2256687Search in Google Scholar

24. Kim JI, Choi H, Lee BI, et al. Physical phantom of typical Korean male for radiation protection purpose. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006;118:131–136.10.1093/rpd/nci33816410295Search in Google Scholar

25. Pina DR, Duarte SB, Morceli J, Ghilardi Netto T. Development of phantom for radiographic image optimization of standard patient in the lateral view of chest and skull examination. Appl Radiat Isot. 2006;64:1623–1630.10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.05.00616854589Search in Google Scholar

26. Rasuli B, Mahmoud-Pashazadeh A, Ghorbani M, Juybari RT, Naserpour M. Patient dose measurement in common medical X-ray examinations in Iran. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(1): 374-386.10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5860569022826894357Search in Google Scholar

27. Winslow JF, Hyer DE, Fisher RF, Tien CJ, Hintenlang DE. Construction of anthropomorphic phantoms for use in dosimetry studies. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009;10(3):195-204.10.1120/jacmp.v10i3.2986572055619692982Search in Google Scholar

28. Jones AK, Hintenlang D, Bolch WE. Tissue equivalent materials for construction of tomographic dosimetry phantoms in pediatric radiology. Med Phys. 2003;30:2072–2081.10.1118/1.159264112945973Search in Google Scholar

29. Fahmi A, Anam C, Suryono, Ali MH, Jauhari A. Correlation between age and head diameters in the paediatric patients during CT examination of the head. Pol J Med Phys Eng. 2019;25(4):229-23510.2478/pjmpe-2019-0030Search in Google Scholar

30. Anam C, Haryanto F, Widita R, Arif I, Dougherty G. Automated calculation of water equivalent diameter (DW) based on AAPM task group 220. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(4):320-333.10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6171569005927455491Search in Google Scholar

31. Lin CS, Chan PC, Huang KH, Lu CF, Chen YF, Chen YOL. Guidelines for reducing image retakes of general digital radiography. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. 2016;8(4):1–6.10.1177/1687814016644127Search in Google Scholar

32. Qin C, Yao D, Shi Y, Song Z. Computer-aided detection in chest radiography based on artificial intelligence: a survey. BioMed Eng OnLine. 2018;17:113.10.1186/s12938-018-0544-y610399230134902Search in Google Scholar