[1. Gonzalez AJ. Current status on the global levels of radiation exposure. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. 2014;16-54.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Hiswara E, Kartikasari D. Dosis pasien pada pemeriksaan rutin sinar-x radiologi diagnostik. Indonesian Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 2015;16:71-84.10.17146/jstni.2015.16.2.2359]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Salat D, Nikodemova D. Patient doses and image quality in digital chest radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;129:147-149.10.1093/rpd/ncn03218321878]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Paydar R, Takavar A, Kardan MR, Babakhani A, Deevband MR, Saber S. Patient effective dose evaluation for chest X-ray examination in three digital radiography centers. Iran J Radiat Res. 2012;10:139-143.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Image quality in chest radiography. ICRU Report 70. 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Moey SF, Fatin Naimah MA. Evaluation of the influence of exposure index on image quality and radiation dose. Iran J Med Phys 2019;16:294-299]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Adhikari SR. Effect and application of ionization radiation (X-ray) in living organism. Kaski. The Himalaya Physics. 2012;3:89-92.10.3126/hj.v3i0.7315]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Rana BS, Kumar S, Sandhu IS, Singh NP. Dosimetry of adult and pediatric patients for common digital radiography examinations. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2018;179:349-357.10.1093/rpd/ncx29329342278]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Sandborg M, Tingberg A, Ullman G, Dance DR, Alm Carlsson G. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages. Med Phys. 2006;33:4169-4175.10.1118/1.236287117153395]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Komite Akreditasi Rumah Sakit. Standar nasional akreditasi rumah sakit edisi 1. 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Martin CJ. Radiation dosimetry for diagnostic medical exposures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;128:389–412.10.1093/rpd/ncm49518375947]Search in Google Scholar
[12. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Phantoms and computational models in therapy, diagnosis and protection. ICRU Publication 48 (Oxford: Pergamon Press). 1992.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Standardized methods for measuring diagnostic X-ray exposures. AAPM Report No 31. 1990.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. American National Standard Institute. Method for the sensitometry of medical X-ray screen-film-processing systems. American National Standard Institute (PH2/43). New York. 1982.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Conway BJ, Butler PF, Duff JE, et al. Beam quality independent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposure from X-ray automatic exposure controlled chest examinations. Med Phys. 1984;11:827–832.10.1118/1.5956116513889]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Pina DR, Duarte SB, Ghilardi Netto T, Morceli J. Phantom development for radiographic image optimization of chest, skull and pelvis examination for nonstandard patient. Appl Radiat Isot. 2009;67(1):61–69.10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.07.01818783956]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Gray JE. Quality control in diagnostic imaging: A quality control cookbook. Baltimor Md: University Park Press.1983.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Conway BJ, Duff JE, Fewell TR, Jennings RJ, Rothenberg LN, Fleischman RC. A patient-equivalent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposures from automatic exposure controlled X-ray examinations of the abdomen and lumbosacral spine. Med Phys. 1990;17(3):448–453.10.1118/1.5964832385202]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Conway BJ, Suleiman OH, Rueter FG, Mccrohan JL. Patient equivalent attenuation phantoms. Radiat Prot Dosimetry.1992;43(1-4):123–125.10.1093/rpd/43.1-4.123]Search in Google Scholar
[20. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: Reference values. ICRP Publication 89 (Oxford: Pergamon press). 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Alves AFF, Miranda JRA, Bacchim Neto FA, Duarte SB, Pina DR. Construction of pediatric homogeneous phantoms for optimization of chest and skull radiographs. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(8):1579-1585.10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.05.01526044295]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Chotas HG, Floyd CE Jr, Johnson GA, Ravin CE. Quality control phantom for digital chest radiography. Radiology. 1997;202(1):111-116.10.1148/radiology.202.1.89881998988199]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Jones AK, Simon TA, Bolch WE, Holman MM, Hintenlang DE. Tomographic physical phantom of the newborn child with real-time dosimetry I. Methods and techniques for construction. Med Phys. 2006;33:3274-3282.10.1118/1.2256687]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Kim JI, Choi H, Lee BI, et al. Physical phantom of typical Korean male for radiation protection purpose. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006;118:131–136.10.1093/rpd/nci33816410295]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Pina DR, Duarte SB, Morceli J, Ghilardi Netto T. Development of phantom for radiographic image optimization of standard patient in the lateral view of chest and skull examination. Appl Radiat Isot. 2006;64:1623–1630.10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.05.00616854589]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Rasuli B, Mahmoud-Pashazadeh A, Ghorbani M, Juybari RT, Naserpour M. Patient dose measurement in common medical X-ray examinations in Iran. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(1): 374-386.10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5860569022826894357]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Winslow JF, Hyer DE, Fisher RF, Tien CJ, Hintenlang DE. Construction of anthropomorphic phantoms for use in dosimetry studies. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009;10(3):195-204.10.1120/jacmp.v10i3.2986572055619692982]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Jones AK, Hintenlang D, Bolch WE. Tissue equivalent materials for construction of tomographic dosimetry phantoms in pediatric radiology. Med Phys. 2003;30:2072–2081.10.1118/1.159264112945973]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Fahmi A, Anam C, Suryono, Ali MH, Jauhari A. Correlation between age and head diameters in the paediatric patients during CT examination of the head. Pol J Med Phys Eng. 2019;25(4):229-23510.2478/pjmpe-2019-0030]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Anam C, Haryanto F, Widita R, Arif I, Dougherty G. Automated calculation of water equivalent diameter (DW) based on AAPM task group 220. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(4):320-333.10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6171569005927455491]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Lin CS, Chan PC, Huang KH, Lu CF, Chen YF, Chen YOL. Guidelines for reducing image retakes of general digital radiography. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. 2016;8(4):1–6.10.1177/1687814016644127]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Qin C, Yao D, Shi Y, Song Z. Computer-aided detection in chest radiography based on artificial intelligence: a survey. BioMed Eng OnLine. 2018;17:113.10.1186/s12938-018-0544-y610399230134902]Search in Google Scholar