1. bookVolumen 24 (2018): Heft 2 (June 2018)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1898-0309
Erstveröffentlichung
30 Dec 2008
Erscheinungsweise
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Uneingeschränkter Zugang

The sensitivity of contact stresses in the mandibular premolar region to the shape of Zirconia dental implant: A 3D finite element study

Online veröffentlicht: 26 Jun 2018
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 24 (2018) - Heft 2 (June 2018)
Seitenbereich: 55 - 63
Eingereicht: 13 Mar 2018
Akzeptiert: 23 May 2018
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1898-0309
Erstveröffentlichung
30 Dec 2008
Erscheinungsweise
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch

[1] Misch CE. Dental Implant Prosthetics. St Louis: Mosby, 2005:322-347.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Brunski JB. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface. Adv Dent Res. 1999;13:99-119.10.1177/08959374990130012301Search in Google Scholar

[3] Geng JP, Ma QS, Xu W, et al. Finite element analysis of four thread-form configurations in a stepped screw implant. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(3):233-239.10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01213.xSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Eraslan O, Inan O. The effect of thread design on stress distribution in a solid screw implant: A 3-D finite element analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2010;14(4):411-416.10.1007/s00784-009-0305-1Search in Google Scholar

[5] Brånemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50(3):399-410.10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2Search in Google Scholar

[6] Natali AN, Pavan PG, Ruggero AL. Analysis of bone–implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006. 17(1):67-74.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01162.x16441786Search in Google Scholar

[7] Faegh S, Chou HY, Muftu S. Load transfer along the bone-implant interface and its effects on bone maintenance. In: Turkyilmaz I (ed). Dental Implants: A Rapidly Evolving Practice. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech Publishing, 2011:163-190.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kurniawan D, Nor FM, Lee HY, et al: Finite element analysis of bone implant biomechanics refinement through featuring various osseointegration conditions. Int J Oral Maxifollac Surg. 2012;41(9):1090-1096.10.1016/j.ijom.2011.12.02622260789Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kong L, Hu K, Li D, et al. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(1):65-74.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Gultekin BA, Gultekin P, Yalcin S. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry. In: Ebrahimi F (ed). Finite Element Analysis: New Trends and Developments. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech Publishing, 2012:21-54.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Bona AD, Pecho OE, Alessandretti R. Zirconia as a Dental Biomaterial. Materials (Basel). 2015;8(8):4978-4991.10.3390/ma8084978545553228793485Search in Google Scholar

[12] Apicella D, Joda T, Bonadeo G, et al. Case-specific finite element analysis of dental CAD/CAM prostheses to identify design flaws prior to manufacture. Am J Dent. 2016;29(6):339-344.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Shriram D, Praveen Kumar G, Cui F, et al. Evaluating the effects of material properties of artificial meniscal implant in the human knee joint using finite element analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1): 6011.10.1038/s41598-017-06271-3551968328729605Search in Google Scholar

[14] Shriram D, Parween R, Lee YHD, et al. Effects of counteracting external valgus moment on lateral tibial cartilage contact conditions and tibial rotation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Bio Soc 2017; 2017:1625-1628.10.1109/EMBC.2017.803715029060194Search in Google Scholar

[15] Shriram D, Kumar GP, Lee YHD, et al. Effect of posterior root tear of the lateral meniscus on the articular cartilage during the stance phase of gait cycle: a finite-element study. Proceedings of XXVI Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Winter W, Klein D, Karl M. Effect of model parameters on finite element analysis of micromotions in implant dentistry. J Oral Implantol 2013;39(1):23-29.10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-0022123402356Search in Google Scholar

[17] Abuhussein H, Pagni G, Rebaudi A, et al. The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(2):129-136.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01800.x19709058Search in Google Scholar

[18] Ao J, Li T, Liu Y, et al. Optimal design of thread height and width on an immediately loaded cylinder implant: A finite element analysis. Comput Biol Med. 2010;40(8):681-686.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2009.10.00720599193Search in Google Scholar

[19] Liu TC, Chang CH, Wong TY, et al. Finite element analysis of mini screw implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;141(4):468-476.10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.11.01222464529Search in Google Scholar

[20] Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds). Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985:199-209.Search in Google Scholar

[21] O’Mahony AM, Williams JL, Spencer P. Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri implant stress and strain under oblique loading. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12(6):648-657.10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120614.x11737110Search in Google Scholar

[22] Dechow PC, Nail GA, Schwartz-Dabney CL, et al. Elastic properties of human supraorbital and mandibular bone. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1993;90(3):291-306.10.1002/ajpa.13309003048460653Search in Google Scholar

[23] O’Mahony AM, Williams JL, Katz JO, et al. Anisotropic elastic properties of cancellous bone from a human edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11(5):415-421.10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005415.x11168233Search in Google Scholar

[24] Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, et a:. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater. 2004;20(5):449-456.10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.00215081551Search in Google Scholar

[25] Giannuzzi LA, Phifer D, Giannuzzi NJ, et al. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional analysis of bone/dental implant interfaces with the use of focused ion beam and electron microscopy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65(4):737-747.10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.02517368372Search in Google Scholar

[26] Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;2(3):120-128.10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00002.x11359256Search in Google Scholar

[27] Li T, Kong L, Wang Y, et al. Selection of optimal dental implant diameter and length in type IV bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(10):1077-1083.10.1016/j.ijom.2009.07.00119656657Search in Google Scholar

[28] Woodmansey KF, Ayik M, Buschang PH, et al. Differences in masticatory function in patients with endodontically treated teeth and single-implant-supported prostheses: A pilot study. J Endod 2009;35(1):10-14.10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.016Search in Google Scholar

[29] Huang HL, Hsu JT, Fuh LJ, et al. Biomechanical simulation of various surface roughnesses and geometric designs on an immediately loaded dental implant. Comput Biol Med. 2010;40(5):525-532.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2010.03.008Search in Google Scholar

[30] Mosavar A, Ziaei A, Kadkhodaei M. The effect of implant thread design on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration conditions: A Finite Element Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30(6):1317-132610.11607/jomi.4091Search in Google Scholar

[31] Froum SJ, Simon H, Cho SC, et al. Histologic evaluation of bone-implant contact of immediately loaded transitional implants after 6 to 27 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20(1):54-60.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Coelho PG, Marin C, Granato R, et al. Clinical device-related article histomorphologic analysis of 30 plateau root form implants retrieved after 8 to 13 years in function. A human retrieval study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;91(2):975-979.10.1002/jbm.b.31455Search in Google Scholar

[33] Hansson S, Werke M. The implant thread as a retention element in cortical bone: The effect of thread size and thread profile: A finite element study. J Biomech 2003; 36:1247–1258.10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00164-7Search in Google Scholar

[34] Misch CE, Strong T, Bidez MW. Scientific rationale for dental implant design. In: Misch CE (ed). Contemporary Implant Dentistry, ed 3. St Louis: Mosby, 2008:200-229.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Fuh LJ, Hsu JT, Huang HL, et al. Biomechanical investigation of thread designs and interface conditions of zirconia and titanium dental Implants with bone: Three-Dimensional Numeric Analysis Int.J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28(2):e64–e71.10.11607/jomi.213123527370Search in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo