Monte Carlo calculated CT numbers for improved heavy ion treatment planning

1. Mustafa, A. A., & Jackson, D. F. (1983). The relation between X-ray CT numbers and charged particle stopping powers and its significance for radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys. Med. Biol., 28, 169-176.10.1088/0031-9155/28/2/0066408654Search in Google Scholar

2. Verhaegen, F., & Devic, S. (2005). Sensitivity study for CT images in Monte Carlo treatment planning. Phys. Med.Biol., 50, 937-946.10.1088/0031-9155/50/5/01615798266Search in Google Scholar

3. Homolka, P., Gahleitner, A., & Nowotny, R. (2002).Temperature dependence of HU values for various water equivalent phantom materials. Phys. Med. Biol., 47, 2917-2923.10.1088/0031-9155/47/16/30712222855Search in Google Scholar

4. Bhat, M., Pattison, J., Bibbo, G., & Caon, M. (1998).Diagnostic X-ray spectra: a comparison of spectra generated by different computational methods with a measured spectrum. Med. Phys., 25, 114-120.10.1118/1.5981709472833Search in Google Scholar

5. Caon, M., Bibbo, G., Pattison, J., & Bhat, M. (1998). The effect on dose to computed tomography phantoms of varying the theoretical X-ray spectrum: a comparison of four diagnostic spectrum calculating codes. Med. Phys., 25, 1021-1027.10.1118/1.5982819650192Search in Google Scholar

6. Ay, M. R., Sarkar, S., Shahriari, M., & Zaidi, H. (2005).Assessment of different computational models for generation of X-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography. Med. Phys., 32, 1660-1675.10.1118/1.190612616013725Search in Google Scholar

7. Ay, M. R., Shahriari, M., Sarkar, S., & Zaidi, H. (2004).Monte Carlo simulation of X-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography using MCNP4C. Phys. Med.Biol., 49, 4897-4917.10.1088/0031-9155/49/21/00415584526Search in Google Scholar

8. Atherton, J. V., & Huda, W. (1995). CT dose in cylindrical phantoms. Phys. Med. Biol., 40, 891-911.10.1088/0031-9155/40/5/0127652014Search in Google Scholar

9. Jarry, G., DeMacro, J. J., Beifuss, U., & Cagnon, C. H. (2003). A Monte Carlo-based method to estimate radiation dose from spiral CT: from phantom testing to patient- -specific models. Phys. Med. Biol., 48, 2645-2663.10.1088/0031-9155/48/16/30612974580Search in Google Scholar

10. Salvado, M., Lopez, M., Morant, J. J., & Calzado, A. (2005). Monte Carlo calculations of radiation dose in CT examination using phantom and patient tomographic models. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 114, 364-368.10.1093/rpd/nch51615933138Search in Google Scholar

11. Tzedakis, A., & Perisnakis, K. (2006). The effect of Z overscanning on radiation burden of pediatric patients undergoing head CT with multidetector scanners: A Monte Carlo study. Med. Phys., 33(7), 2472-2478.10.1118/1.220721216898450Search in Google Scholar

12. Wysocka-Rabin, A., Qamhiyeh, S., & Jäkel, O. (2011).Simulation of computed tomography (CT) images using a Monte Carlo approach. Nukleonika, 56(4), 299-304.Search in Google Scholar

13. Heismann, B. J., Leppert, J., & Stierstorfer, K. (2003).Density and atomic number measurements with spectral X-ray attenuation method. J. Appl. Phys., 94, 2073-2079.10.1063/1.1586963Search in Google Scholar

14. Gammex-RMI. (2004). Electron density CT phantom.Catalogue. Retrieved from http://www.gammex.com/ace-files/Gammex_Catalog.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

15. Jäkel, O., Jacob, C., Schardt, D., Karger, C., & Hartmann, G. H. (2001). Relation between carbon ion ranges and X-ray CT numbers. Med. Phys., 28(4), 701-703.10.1118/1.135745511339768Search in Google Scholar

16. Kawrakow, I. (2000). Accurate condensed history Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport. EGSnrc, the new EGS4 version. Med. Phys., 27, 485-498.10.1118/1.59891710757601Search in Google Scholar

17. Kawrakow, I., & Rogers, D. W. O. (2003). The EGSnrc cod system: Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transports. Ottawa: National Research Council of Canada. (PRIS-701).Search in Google Scholar

18. Rogers, D. W. O., Ma, C. M., Walters, B., Ding, G. X., Sheikh-Bagheri, D., & Zhang, G. (2001). BEAMnrc Users manual. Ottawa: National Research Council of Canada. (PRIS-0509(A) rev. G).Search in Google Scholar

19. Verhaegen, F. (2002). Evaluation of the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code for interference near high-Z media exposed to kilovolt and 60Co photons. Phys. Med. Biol., 47, 1691-1705.10.1088/0031-9155/47/10/30612069087Search in Google Scholar

20. Verhaegen, F., Nahum, A. E., Van de Putte, S., & Namito, Y. (1999). Monte Carlo modelling of radiotherapy kV X-ray units. Phys. Med. Biol., 44, 1767-1789.10.1088/0031-9155/44/7/31510442712Search in Google Scholar

21. Romanchikova, M. (2006). Monte Carlo Simulation des Röntgenspektrums einer computertomographischen Röntgenröhre. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Heidelberg, Germany.Search in Google Scholar

22. Qamhiyeh, S. (2007). A Monte Carlo study of the accuracy of CT numbers for range calculations in Carbon ion therapy. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Heidelberg, Germany.Search in Google Scholar

23. Kachelrieß, M., & Kalender, W. (2005). Improving PET/ CT attenuation correction with iterative CT beam hardening corrections. In 2005 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 23-29 October 2005. (Vol. 4).IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2005.1596704.10.1109/NSSMIC.2005.1596704Search in Google Scholar

24. Kachelrieß, M., Sourbelle, K., & Kalender, W. (2006). Empirical cupping corrections: a first-order raw data precorrection for cone beam computed tomography. Phys. Med.Biol., 33, 1269-1274.10.1118/1.218807616752561Search in Google Scholar

25. Sennst, D. A., Kachelriess, M., Leidercker, C., Schmidt, B., Watzke, O., & Kalender, W. A. (2004). An extensible software-based platform for reconstruction and evaluation of CT images. Radiographics, 24(2), 601-613.10.1148/rg.24203511915026605Search in Google Scholar

26. Ay, M. R., & Zaidi, H. (2005). Development and validation of MCNP4C-based Monte Carlo simulator for fan and cone beam X-ray CT. Phys. Med. Biol., 50, 4863-3885.10.1088/0031-9155/50/20/00916204878Search in Google Scholar

27. Qamhiyeh, S., Wysocka-Rabin, A., Ellerbrock, M., & Jäkel, O. (2007). Effect of voltage of CT scanner, phantom size and phantom material on CT calibration and carbon range.Radiother. Oncol., 84(S1), S232.Search in Google Scholar

28. Bazalova, M., Carrier, J. F., Beaulieu, L., & Verhaegen, F. (2008). Tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo treatment planning: a simulation study using dual-energy CT images.Radiother. Oncol., 86(1), 93-98.10.1016/j.radonc.2007.11.00818068841Search in Google Scholar

29. Hünemohr, N., Krauss, B., Dinkel, J., Gillmann, C., Ackermann, B., Jäkel, O., & Greilich, S. (2013). Ion range estimation by using dual energy computed tomography. Z. Med. Phys., 23(4), 300-313.10.1016/j.zemedi.2013.03.00123597413Search in Google Scholar

30. Wysocka-Rabin, A. (2013) Advances in conformal radiotherapy using Monte Carlo Code to design new IMRT and IORT Accelerators and interpret CT numbers. (CERN- -WUT Editorial series on “Accelerator Science”. Vol. 17). Warsaw: Institute of Electronic Systems, Warsaw University of Technology. Search in Google Scholar