1. bookVolumen 15 (2022): Heft 1 (June 2022)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1338-4309
Erstveröffentlichung
03 Aug 2009
Erscheinungsweise
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
access type Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Multiple Streams Framework as Scientific Research Program and Tool for the Analysis of Public Policy Issues

Online veröffentlicht: 14 Jun 2022
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 15 (2022) - Heft 1 (June 2022)
Seitenbereich: 141 - 165
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1338-4309
Erstveröffentlichung
03 Aug 2009
Erscheinungsweise
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Abstract

The Multiple Streams Framework (MSF) is currently one of the most widely used frameworks in policy process research. It explains how policy agenda develops in the policy process with emphasis on policy adoption. This article examines MSF from the perspective of the history of science and Lakatos’ methodology of scientific research programs. In this respect, we consider MSF a “semi-strong theory” that uses a form of subsumption under theory for scientific explanation. This differs from a “strong” explanatory theory (e.g., physics), which uses explanations in the form of subsumption under scientific law. From the point of view of Lakatos’ methodology, MSF represents a scientific research program.

The basic element is a hard core given mainly by the MSF hypothesis for the framework as a whole and MSF assumptions and key structural elements. Around the hard core there is a protective belt of auxiliary hypotheses. They correspond to hypotheses related to the framework’s key elements and to the hypothesis for the framework as a whole. MSF has negative heuristics (prohibition of the use of the modus tollens rule) and positive heuristics, which are represented by a set of theoretically and empirically progressive theories that further develop the MSF research program. An analysis of studies on MSF reveals that single hypotheses are only exceptionally tested using “hard” data and quantitative methods. Qualitative analysis (case studies) predominates, which contributes to the development of MSF theory. Therefore, we can consider a progressive shift in theory.

In this respect, MSF can be considered a successful research program. However, in terms of the methodology of scientific research programs, MSF has a number of other opportunities to develop hypothesis testing further and use various modelling methods with data sets. Thus, MSF represents an interesting scientific research program, which needs to be further developed and specified in the spirit of the methodology of scientific research programs, It is a challenge for interdisciplinary research in the field of social sciences.

Ackrill, R., Kay, A., & Zahariadis, N. (2013). Ambiquity, multiple streams, and EU policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 871-887.10.1080/13501763.2013.781824 Search in Google Scholar

Bachelard, G. (1978). Le novel esprit scientique (14th ed.). Presses Universitaires se France. Search in Google Scholar

Bunge, M. (2004). How Does It Works for Explanatory Mechanism? Philosophy of the Social Science 34, 182-210.10.1177/0048393103262550 Search in Google Scholar

Cairney, P., & Jones, M. D. (2016). Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Approach: What Is the Empirical Impact of This Universal Theory? Policy Studies Journal, 44, 37-58.10.1111/psj.12111 Search in Google Scholar

Carter, N. & Jacob, M. (2014). Explaning radical policy change: the case of climate change and energy policy under the British labour government 2006-10. Public Administration, 92(1), 125-141.10.1111/padm.12046 Search in Google Scholar

Chang, S.-N., & Chiu, M.-H. (2008). Lakatos’ Scientific Research Programmes as a Framework for Analysing Informal Argumentation about Socio-scientific Issues. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1753-1773.10.1080/09500690701534582 Search in Google Scholar

Cioffi-Revilla, C. (2009). Simplicity and reality in computational modeling of politics. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 15, 26-46.10.1007/s10588-008-9042-2 Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1-25.10.2307/2392088 Search in Google Scholar

Copeland, P., & Scott, J. (2014). Policy windows, ambiguity and Commission entrepreneurship: explaining the relaunch of the European Union’s economic reform agenda. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(1), 1-19.10.1080/13501763.2013.800789 Search in Google Scholar

Elman, C., & Elman, M. F. (2002). How not to be Lakatos intolerant: Appraising progress in IR research. International Studies Quarterly, 46, 231-262.10.1111/1468-2478.00231 Search in Google Scholar

Engler, F., & Herweg, N. (2019).Of Barriers to Entry for Medium and Large n Multiple Streams Applications: Methodological and Conceptual Considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 47, 905-926.10.1111/psj.12235 Search in Google Scholar

Erdin, H. O. (2020). Appraisal of certain methodologies in cognitive science based on Lakatos’s methodology of scientific research programmes. Synthese, 199(Suppl 1), 89-112. Search in Google Scholar

Gold, S. (2014). Supply chain management as Lakatosian research program. Supply Chain Management - an International Journal, 19, 1-9.10.1108/SCM-05-2013-0168 Search in Google Scholar

Hempel, C. G. (1942). The Function General Laws in History. The Journal of Philosophy, 39(2), 35-48.10.2307/2017635 Search in Google Scholar

Hempel, C. G. (1958). The theoretician’s dilemma: A study in the logic of theory construction. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. Search in Google Scholar

Herweg, N., Huss, C., & Zohlnhöfer, R. (2015). Straightening the Three Streams: Theorizing Extensions of the Multiple Streams Framework. European Journal of Political Research, 54, 435-449.10.1111/1475-6765.12089 Search in Google Scholar

Herweg, N., & Zahariadis, N. (2017). Multiple Streams. In N. Zahariadis, & L. A. Buonanno (eds), The Routledge Handbook of European Public Policy (pp. 17-53). Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Herweg, N., Zahariadis, N., & Zohlnhöfer, R. (2017). The Multiple Streams Framework: Foundations, Refinements, and Empirical Applications. In C. M. Weible, & P. A. Sabatier (eds), Theories of the Policy Process (4th ed., pp. 17-53). Westview Press. Search in Google Scholar

Jones, M. D., Peterson, H. L., Pierce, J. J., Herweg, N., Bernal, A., Lamberta, H., & Zahariadis, N. (2016). A River Runs through It: A Multiple Streams Meta Review. Policy Studies Journal, 44, 13-36.10.1111/psj.12115 Search in Google Scholar

Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (1st ed.). Harper Collins. Search in Google Scholar

Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. (2nd ed.). Harper Collins. Search in Google Scholar

Kingdon, J. W. (2011). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policy. Longman. Search in Google Scholar

Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Harvard University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (2nd ed.). University of Chicago. Search in Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. (1970). History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1970, 91-136. http://www.jstor.org/stable/49575710.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1970.495757 Search in Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematics Discovery. J. Worrall, & E. Zahar (eds). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139171472 Search in Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. (1978a). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers, Volume II. J. Worrall, & G. Currie (eds). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621123 Search in Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. (1978b). Mathematics, Science and Epistemology. Philosophical Papers, Volume II. J. Worrall, & G. Currie, (eds). Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Lakatos, I., & Musgrave, A. (1970). Criticisms and the Growth of Knowledge: Proceeding of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London 1965, Volume 4. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139171434 Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, A., & Javidpour, J. (2010). Potential pathways of invasion and dispersal of Mnemiopsis leidyi A. Agassiz 1865 in the Baltic Sea. Hydrobiologia, 649, 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0750-010-0233-8 Search in Google Scholar

Little, D. (1991). Varieties of Social Explanation: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Science. Westview Press. Search in Google Scholar

Meijerink, S. (2006). Understanding policy stability and change: The interplay of advocacy coalitions and epistemic communities, windows of opportunity, and Dutch coastal flooding policy 1945-2003. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(6), 1060-1077.10.1080/13501760500270745 Search in Google Scholar

Neurath, O. (1931-1932). Soziologie im Physikalismus. Erkenntnis, 1931-1932(2), 393-431.10.1007/BF02028171 Search in Google Scholar

Ochrana, F. (2012). Methodology of Science: Introduction. Karolinum. Search in Google Scholar

Ochrana, F. (2015). Methodology of Social Science. Karolinum. Search in Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. (2015). Advanced Introduction to Public Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

Ochrana, F., & Novotný, V. (2021). Využití metodologie vědeckovýzkumných programů pro hodnocení vědeckovýzkumné činnosti [Using the methodology of scientific research programmes for the evaluation of scientific research activities]. Socioekonomické a humanitní studie, 13(1), 67-86. Search in Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. (2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Potůček, M, Rudolfová, V. & Vlčková, K. 2017. Public Policy: A Comprehensive Introduction. Karolinum. Search in Google Scholar

Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of Chaos; Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. Bantam Books. Search in Google Scholar

Ridde, V. (2009). Policy implementation of an African state: an Extension of Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Approach. Public Administration, 87(4), 938-954.10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01792.x Search in Google Scholar

Sabatier, P. A. (ed.). (1999a). Theories of the Policy Process (1st ed.). Westview Press. Search in Google Scholar

Sabatier, P. A. (ed.). (1999b). The Need for Better Theories. In P. A. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (1st ed., pp. 3-17). Westview Press.10.4324/9780367274689-1 Search in Google Scholar

Sabatier, P. A. (ed.). 2007. Theories of the Policy Process (2nd ed.). Westview Press. Search in Google Scholar

Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (eds). 2014. Theories of the Policy Process (3rd ed.). Westview Press. Search in Google Scholar

Silva, S. T. (2009). On evolutionary technological change and economic growth: Lakatos as a starting point for appraisal. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19, 111-135.10.1007/s00191-008-0115-7 Search in Google Scholar

Thiem, A., Baumgartner, M., & Bol, D. (2016). Still Lost in Translation! A Correction of Three Misunderstandings between Configurational Comparativists and Regressional Analysts. Comparative Political Studies, 49, 742-774.10.1177/0010414014565892 Search in Google Scholar

Walker, T. C. (2010). The Perils of Paradigm Mentalities: Revisiting Kuhn, Lakatos, and Popper. Perspectives on Politics, 8,433-451.10.1017/S1537592710001180 Search in Google Scholar

Weible, C. M. (2008). Expert-Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 615-635.10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00287.x Search in Google Scholar

Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (eds). (2017). Theories of the Policy Process (4th ed.). Routledge, Westview Press. Search in Google Scholar

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage. Search in Google Scholar

Zahariadis, N. (1999). Ambiguity, Time, and Multiple Streams. In P. A. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (1st ed., pp. 73-93). Westview Press. Search in Google Scholar

Zahariadis, N. (2003). Ambiguity and Choice in Public Policy: Political Manipulation in Democratic Societies. Georgetown University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Zahariadis, N. (2007). The Multiple Streams Framework: Structure, Limitations, Prospects. In P. A. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (2nd ed., pp. 65-92). Westview Press.s Search in Google Scholar

Zahariadis, N. (2014). Ambiguity and Multiple Streams. In P. A. Sabatier, & C. M. Weible (eds), Theories of the Policy Process (3rd ed., pp. 25-58). Westview Press. Search in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo