1. bookVolumen 15 (2022): Heft 1 (June 2022)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1338-4309
Erstveröffentlichung
03 Aug 2009
Erscheinungsweise
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
access type Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Citizens’ Attitudes to Nudges in the Maintenance of Public Spaces and Waste Management

Online veröffentlicht: 14 Jun 2022
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 15 (2022) - Heft 1 (June 2022)
Seitenbereich: 113 - 139
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1338-4309
Erstveröffentlichung
03 Aug 2009
Erscheinungsweise
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Abstract

Behavioural interventions, or nudges, can be seen in public policy as a tool to help local governments in a variety of areas. The main advantages of nudges include the low costs associated with their implementation and, on the other hand, the relatively high effect if the factors acting on individuals are correctly identified (e.g., the salience factor associated with the individual’s bias, social norms, or how the individual’s surroundings react). Before implementing a behavioural intervention, it is necessary to know, the motives or causes of the behaviour of the inhabitants in the city.

The paper is specifically devoted to the nudges that can be implemented in the maintenance of public spaces and waste management. The aim of the paper is to find out the attitudes of citizens towards the problems in maintenance of public spaces and waste management caused by human behaviour as well as possible solutions in the form of selected types of nudges.

The paper identified several reasons that can contribute to an increase the level of citizen participation in waste separation and improve the quality of maintenance of public spaces, such as where the nudging is implemented (factor of affect), attractiveness of the nudge (factor of silence) and the commitment of individuals. The selected behavioural interventions show that there is a willingness on the part of the citizens in a local municipality to accept nudges and the citizens tendency to change behaviour in the desired way.

JEL Classification

Andreoni, J., & Brownback, A. (2017). All pay auctions and group size: Grading on a curve and other applications Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 137, 361-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.03.17 Search in Google Scholar

Andreoni, J., Payne, A. A., Smith, J., & Karp, D. (2016).Diversity and donations: The effect of religious and ethnic diversity on charitable giving. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 128, 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/-j.jebo.2016.05.010 Search in Google Scholar

Ballot Bin. (2016, July 1). Hubbub Foundation. Retrieved October 7, 2021, from https://www.hubbub.org.uk/ballot-bin Search in Google Scholar

Barile, L., Cullis, J., & Jones, P. (2015). Will one size fit all? Incentives designed to nurture prosocial behaviour. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 57, 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2015.04.00410.1016/j.socec.2015.04.004 Search in Google Scholar

Bemelmans-Videc, M., Vedung, E., & Rist, R. C. (1998). Carrots, sticks, and sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

Bernstad, A. (2014). Household food waste separation behavior and the importance of convenience. Waste Management, 34(7), 1317-1323. https://doi.org/-10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.01310.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.013 Search in Google Scholar

Briffa, J., Sinagra, E., & Blundell, R. (2020). Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans. Heliyon, 6(9), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e0469110.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04691 Search in Google Scholar

Chakravarty, S., & Fonseca, M. A. (2014). The effect of social fragmentation on public good provision: An experimental study. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 53, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2014.07.00210.1016/j.socec.2014.07.002 Search in Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B. (2016). Před-svědčování: Revoluční způsob, jak ovlivnit a přesvědčit. Jan Melvil Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

CIVITA CENTER, 2019. Záverečná správa z realizovanej behaviorálnej intervencie. Retrieved April 10, 2021, from https://www.civitacenter.sk/wpcontent/-uploads/2020/02/Sprava_03Znecistenie_VP_web.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Cornel, S. (2018). The effectiveness of nudging in increasing recycling behaviour. (Thesis). Amsterdam University Press. Search in Google Scholar

DellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 315-372. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.31510.1257/jel.47.2.315 Search in Google Scholar

Diamond, P., & Vartiainen, H. (2007). Behavioral economics and its applications (1st ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400829149 Search in Google Scholar

Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D., Institute for Government (Great Britain), & Vlaev, I. (2010). MINDSPACE: Influencing behaviour through public policy. Cabinet Office. Discussion document - not a statement of government policy. Also available online at: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/-sites/default/files/publications/MINDSPACE.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Duffy, S., & Verges, M. (2008). It matters a hole lot: Perceptual affordances of waste containers influence recycling compliance. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 741-749. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391650832373710.1177/0013916508323737 Search in Google Scholar

Durantini, M. R., Albarracín, D., Mitchell, A. L., Earl, A. N., & Gillette, J. C. (2006). Conceptualizing the influence of social agents of behavior change: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of HIV-prevention interventionists for different groups. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 212-248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.21210.1037/0033-2909.132.2.212 Search in Google Scholar

European Economic and Social Committee. (2017). Towards applying nudge thinking to EU policies. Newsroom - European Commission. Retrieved April 10, 2021, from https://europa.eu/newsroom/events/towards-applying-nudge-thinking-eu-policies_en Search in Google Scholar

Fehr, E., & Hoff, K. (2011). Introduction: Tastes, castes and culture: The influence of society on preferences. The Economic Journal, 121(556), F396-F412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02478.x10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02478.x Search in Google Scholar

Foulsham, T., Gejdosova, M., & Caunt, L. (2019). Reading and Misleading: Changes in Head and Eye Movements Reveal Attentional Orienting in a Social Context. Vision, 3(3), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision303004310.3390/vision3030043 Search in Google Scholar

Francey, D., & Bergmüller, R. (2012). Images of eyes enhance investments in a real-life public good. PLoS ONE, 7(5), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.003739710.1371/journal.pone.0037397 Search in Google Scholar

Halpern, D. (2016). Inside the nudge unit: How small changes can make a big difference. London: Ebury Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, P. G. (2018). Basic toolkit and ethical guidelines for policy makers - draft for consultation. Western Cape Government - OECD Behavioural insight conference, Cape Town, South Africa. Also available online at: http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/BASIC-Toolkit-Draft-for-Consultation.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, P. G., & Jespersen, A. M. (2013). Nudge and the manipulation of choice. A framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behavior change in public policy. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 4(1), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1017/sl867299x00002762 Search in Google Scholar

Nudge and the manipulation of choice: A framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behavior change in public policy Search in Google Scholar

Hardisty, D. J., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Discounting future green: Money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 329-340. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001643310.1037/a0016433 Search in Google Scholar

Hardisty, D. J., Thompson, K., Krantz, D., & Weber, E. U. (2013). How to measure discount rates? An experimental comparison of three methods. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(3), 236-249. Search in Google Scholar

Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575-604. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901-135109 Search in Google Scholar

Institute of Public Policy, Comenius University. (2016). Experiment na Hlavnej stanici v Bratislave - Ústav verejnej politiky FSEV UK - (blog.sme.sk). blog.sme.sk. Retrieved January 19, 2022, from https://blog.sme.sk/uvp/politika/experiment-na-hlavnej-stanici-v-bratislave Search in Google Scholar

Inudgeyou. (2016, February 1). Do prescriptions work better than proscriptions? Retrieved April 10, 2021, from https://inudgeyou.com/en/do-prescriptions-work-better-than-proscriptions/ Search in Google Scholar

Jakuš Muthová, N., Murray Svidroňová, M., Vitálišová, K., & Malíček, M. (2021, October 21-23). Behavioural interventions in selected public services [Paper presentation]. Citizens’ Engagement and Empowerment - The Era of Collaborative Innovation in Governance, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292. https://doi.org/10.2307/191418510.2307/1914185 Search in Google Scholar

Keep Britain Tidy. (2016). Annual report 2015/16. Retrieved April 10, 2021, from https://www.keepbritaintidy.org/sites/default/files/resource/KBT_Annual_Report_2015-16.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Keep Scotland Beautiful. (2017). Neat streets: Grassmarket summary report. Retrieved April 10, 2021, from https://www.keepscotlandbeautiful.org/media/1557662/-neatstreets-report-final.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2008). The spreading of disorder. Science, 322(5908), 1681-1685. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.116140510.1126/science.1161405 Search in Google Scholar

Lussier, J. P., Heil, S. H., Mongeon, J. A., Badger, G. J., & Higgins, S. T. (2006). A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction, 101(2), 192-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01311.x10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01311.x Search in Google Scholar

Luttmer, E. F. P. (2001b). Group loyalty and the taste for redistribution. Journal of Political Economy, 109(3), 500-528. https://doi.org/10.1086/32101910.1086/321019 Search in Google Scholar

Mandel, N., & Johnson, E. J. (2002). When web pages influence choice: Effects of visual primes on experts and novices. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.1086/34157310.1086/341573 Search in Google Scholar

Michie, S., Atkins, L., & West, R. (2014). The behaviour change wheel: A guide to designing interventions. London: Silverback Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

Milford, A., Øvrum, A., & Helgesen, H. (2015). Discussion paper No. 2015 - 01 Nudges to increase recycling and reduce waste. Norwegian Agricultural Economics Research Institute. Retrieved April 10, 2021, from https://-pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d396/a4c23b0b4600860cb55b60b83d806be6a7b3.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Nosenzo, D., Quercia, S., & Sefton, M. (2015). Cooperation in small groups: The effect of group size. Experimental Economics, 18(1), 4-14. https://doi.org/-10.1007/sl0683-013-9382-810.1007/s10683-013-9382-8 Search in Google Scholar

OECD. (2017, May 10). Using behavioural insights to improve waste management and resource efficiency. Tackling Environmental Problems with the Help of Behavioural Insights | OECD iLibrary. Retrieved September 5, 2021, from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/tackling-environmental-problems-with-the-help-of-behavioural-insights/using-behavioural-insights-to-improve-waste-management-and-resource-efficiency_9789264273887-9-en Search in Google Scholar

Plasteurope. (2019, April 17). SLOVAKIA: Phase-out of nine single-use plastic products / Bottle deposit scheme planned \ Plasteurope.com. KunststoffWeb GmbH, Bad Homburg. Retrieved October 7, 2021, from https://www.plasteurope.com-/news/SLOVAKIA_t242280/10.3390/safety7010017 Search in Google Scholar

Ramakuru, N. 2018. Nudging for change: Part 1 of 2. Urban Design Collective. Retrieved October 17, 2021, from https://urbandesigncollective.-wordpress.com/2018/01/01/nudging-for-change/ Search in Google Scholar

Ross, L. 1977. The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10: 173-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60357-310.1016/S0065-2601(08)60357-3 Search in Google Scholar

Samuelsen, A. G., & Støyle, R. V. (2016). The power of nudging; using reverse logistics to improve recycling behaviour in household waste management while taking the intention-action gap into account. (Master’s dissertation). BI Norwegian Business School, https://biopen.bi.no/bi-xmlui/handle/l1250/2443866 Search in Google Scholar

Shayo, M. (2009). A model of social identity with an application to political economy: Nation, class, and redistribution. American Political Science Review, 103(2), 147-174. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000305540909019410.1017/S0003055409090194 Search in Google Scholar

Sičáková-Beblavá, E., Sloboda, M., & Pavlovský, P. (2020). Chytré spravovanie samospráv: nová paradigma modernizácie verejnej správy a slovenská prax. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského. Search in Google Scholar

Slavik, J., & Pavel, J. (2013). Do the variable charges really increase the effectiveness and economy of waste management? A case study of the Czech Republic. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 70, 68-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/-j.resconrec.2012.09.013 Search in Google Scholar

Slavík, J., & Rybová, K. (2017). The costs of municipal waste and separate collection- efficient measures how to cut them down. In Proceeding of the 21st International Conference Current Trends in Public Sector Research 2017 (pp. 371-378). Masaryk University Brno. Search in Google Scholar

Spehr, K., & Curnow, R. (2015). Litter-ology: Understanding littering and the secrets to clean public places. Environment Books. Search in Google Scholar

Šauer, P., Pařízková, L., & Hadrabová, A. (2008b). Charging systems for municipal solid waste: Experience from the Czech Republic. Waste Management, 28(12), 2772-2777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.03.03010.1016/j.wasman.2008.03.030 Search in Google Scholar

Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. R. (2010). Nudge (Št’ouch): Jak postrčit lidi k lepšímu rozhodování o zdraví, majetku a štěstí. Zlín: Kniha Zlín. Search in Google Scholar

Thaler, R. (2017). Neočekávané chování. Podivuhodný příběh behaviorální ekonomie. Praha: Argo, Dokořán. Search in Google Scholar

Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249-268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.24910.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249 Search in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo