[Monographs and articles]Search in Google Scholar
[1. Akçayir M., Akçayir G., Pektas H. M., Ocak M. A. (2016). Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students’ laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories, Computers in Human Behavior, No. 57, p. 334–342.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Carmigniani J., Furht B. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview, [In:] Furht B. (red.): Handbook of augmented reality, Springer, Nowy Jork.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Coates, G. (1992). Program from invisible site — a virtual shop, a multimedia performance. San Francisco, CA: Performance Works.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Choi Y. K., Taylor, C. R. (2014). How do 3-dimensional images promote products on the Internet? Journal of Business Research, 67, 2164–2170.10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.026]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Duncan T., Moriarty S. E. (1998). A Communications-Based Marketing Model for Managing Relationships. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62, No. 2.10.1177/002224299806200201]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Fisher S. S., McGreevy M., Humphries J., Robinett W. (1986). Virtual environment display system. In Proc. 1986 ACM Workshop on Interactive 3D Graphics (Chapel Hill, NC, Oct. 1986), p. 77–87.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Gobbetti E., Scateni R. (1998). Virtual reality: Past, present and future, Studies in health technology and informatics, 02/98.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Grudzewski F., Awdziej M., Mazurek G., Piotrowska K. (2018). Virtual reality in marketing communication — the impact on the message, technology and offer perception — empirical study. Economics and Business Review, Vol. 4 (18), No. 3, 2018: 36–50.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Hajduk G. (2016). Challenges for marketing communications in the digital age. [w:] G. Mazurek & J. Tkaczyk (Eds.), The impact of the digital world on management and marketing (pp. 183–195). Warszawa: Poltext.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Huang H., Liaw S., Lai C. (2016). Exploring learner acceptance of the use of virtual reality in medical education. Interactive Learning Environments, No. 24 (1), 2016, p. 3–19.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Kaplan, A. & Mazurek, G. (2018). Social media: state of the art and research agenda. [w:] B. Mierzejewska, J. Jung, & A., Albarran, (Ed.), 2nd handbook of media management and economics. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Korniejenko K. (2018). Wykorzystanie wirtualnej rzeczywistości jako nowoczesnego narzędzia wsparcia w kształceniu inżynierów. Zeszyty Naukowe Wydziału Elektrotechniki i Automatyki Politechniki Gdańskiej No. 58/2018, p. 37–40.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Kowalska M. (2007) Zyskać przewagę. Zintegrowana komunikacja w nowoczesnym marketingu. wyd. A. Marszałek, Toruń.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Mazurek, G. (2011). Informacja w wirtualnym środowisku a rozwój społeczeństwa informacyjnego. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług, 186–194.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Mazuryk, T., Gervautz, M. (1996). Virtual Reality: history, applications, technology and future, technical report. Vienna: Institute of Computer Graphics, Vienna University of Technology.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Raja V., Calvo P. (2017). Augmented reality: An ecological blend. Cognitive Systems Research, No. 42, 2017, p. 58–72.10.1016/j.cogsys.2016.11.009]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Scatena S., Russo G. N., Riva G. (2016). Virtual Reality vs television vs web exposure: the impact on brand experience. A preliminary study. Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine, 14, 211–214.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Schmandt C. (1983). Interactive three-dimensional computer space. Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 367, p. 155–159.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Wrzosek W. (2012). Strategie marketingowe. PWE, Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Van Kerrebroeck H., Brengman M., Willems K. (2017). When brands come to life: experimental research on the vividness effect of Virtual Reality in transformational marketing communications. Virtual Reality, 21(4), 177–191.10.1007/s10055-017-0306-3]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Verhagen T., Vonkeman C., van Dolen W. (2016). Making online products more tangible: the effect of product presentation formats on product evaluations. Cyberpsychology. Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(7), 460–464.10.1089/cyber.2015.0520]Search in Google Scholar
[1. https://www.volvocars.com/us/about/our-points-of-pride/google-cardboard (27.06.2019)]Search in Google Scholar
[2. https://www.ikea.com/ms/pl_PL/this-is-ikea/ikea-highlights/Virtual-reality/index.html (26.06.2019)]Search in Google Scholar
[3. https://marketinglink.pl/wirtualna-rzeczywistosc-dlaczego-warto-sie-tym-przejmowac/ (26.06.2019)]Search in Google Scholar
[4. https://pclab.pl/art69208.html (22.06.2019)]Search in Google Scholar
[5. https://epicvr.pl/pl/skuteczne-kampanie-vr/ (25.06.2019)]Search in Google Scholar
[6. https://www.pcworld.pl/ranking/8-branz-ktore-zmieni-VR,407042.html (23.06.2019)]Search in Google Scholar
