The Possibility of Overcoming Barriers in International Cooperation in the Area of R&D from the Point of View of a Research Unit, Based on the Example of the Institute of Aviation

1. Axelrod, R. M., Hamilton, W. D. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

2. Barta, G., Csizmadia, Z., Deak, C., Dõry, T., Kiss, A., Lengyel, B. (2011). R&D Cooperation Between Universities And Enterprises. Centre For Regional Studies Of Hungarian Academy Of Sciences: Discussion Papers, 84.Search in Google Scholar

3. Barkema, H., Bell, J., Pennings, J. (1996). Foreign entry, cultural barriers and learning. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (2), 151–166.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199602)17:2<151::AID-SMJ799>3.0.CO;2-ZSearch in Google Scholar

4. Boultellier, O., Grassman, M. von Zedtwitz, (2000). Managing Global Innovation. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-04250-2Search in Google Scholar

5. Buckley, P. J., Casson, M. (1976). The future of multinational enterprise. New York: Holmes and Meier.10.1007/978-1-349-02899-3Search in Google Scholar

6. Bufon, M., Minghi, J., Paasi, A. (2014). The New European Frontiers: Social and Spatial (Re) Integration Issues in Multicultural and Border Regions. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

7. Camera, G., Casari, M. (2009). Cooperation among strangers under the shadow of the future. American Economic Review, 99 (3), 979–1005.10.1257/aer.99.3.979Search in Google Scholar

8. Chesa, V. (1996). Strategies for global R&D. Research-Technology Management, Sep.–Oct., 19–25.10.1080/08956308.1996.11671085Search in Google Scholar

9. Cho, M. (2014). Cooperation in the repeated prisoner’s dilemma game with local interaction and local communication. International Journal of Economic Theory, 10, 235–262 doi: 10.1111/ijet.12039.10.1111/ijet.12039Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Cygler, J., Wyka, S. (w druku). Internal barriers to international R&D cooperation of Polish high tech enterprises. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia.Search in Google Scholar

11. Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1095–1121.10.1002/smj.275Search in Google Scholar

12. D’Aveni, R. A., Gunther, R. (1995). Hypercompetitive Rivals. Competing in Highly Dynamic Environments, New York: The Free Press, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

13. Dicken, P. (1992). Global Shift. New York: Guilford Press.Search in Google Scholar

14. Dittrich, K., Duysters, G. (2007). Networking as a means to strategy change: The case of open innovation in mobile telephony. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24, 510–521.10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00268.xSearch in Google Scholar

15. Dixit, A, K, Nalebuff B. J, (2009). The art of strategy: A game theorist’s guide to success in bussines & life. New York, London, W. W. Norton & Company.Search in Google Scholar

16. Dyer, J. (1997). Effective interfirm collaboration: how firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), 535–556.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<535::AID-SMJ885>3.0.CO;2-ZSearch in Google Scholar

17. Dyer, J. H. (2000). Collaborative advantage. Winning through extended enterprise supplier networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

18. Fandrejewska, A., Wasilik, K. (2018). Cultural Differences and Barriers in Communication and Functioning of an International Organisation. Handel Wewnętrzny, 1 (372), 203–215.Search in Google Scholar

19. Franke, N., Piller, F. (2004). Value Creation by Toolkits for User Innovation and Design: The Case of the Watch Market. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 401–415.10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00094.xSearch in Google Scholar

20. Gestland, R. R. (2012). Cross-cultural Business Behavior: A Guide for Global Management. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Search in Google Scholar

21. Henderson, R., Cockburn, I. (1994). Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15 (Special Issue), 63–84.10.1002/smj.4250150906Search in Google Scholar

22. Hindmoor, A. (1998). The importance of being trusted: Transaction costs and policy network theory. Public Administration, 78, 25–43.10.1111/1467-9299.00089Search in Google Scholar

23. Hong, P., Park, Y. W. (2015). Building network capabilities in turbulent competitive environments. Business success stories from the BRICS, Boca Raton: CRC Press10.1201/b17918Search in Google Scholar

24. King, A. (2007). Cooperation between corporations and environmental groups: A transaction cost perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32 (3), 889–900.10.5465/amr.2007.25275680Search in Google Scholar

25. Lui, S. S., Ngo, H. (2005). An action pattern model of inter-firm cooperation. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (6), 1123–1153.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00536.xSearch in Google Scholar

26. McGahan, A. M. (2004). Business Strategy over the Industry Lifecycle. Advances in Strategic Management, 21, 317–358.Search in Google Scholar

27. Mayberry, J. P. Harsanyi, J. C., Scarf, M. E., Selten, R. (1992). Game — Theoretic models of co-operation and conflict. San Francisco: Westview PressSearch in Google Scholar

28. Medcof, J. W. (2001). Resource-based strategy and managerial power in networks of internationally dispersed technology units. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 999–1012.10.1002/smj.192Search in Google Scholar

29. Parkhe, A. (1993). Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36 (4), 794–829.10.2307/256759Search in Google Scholar

30. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: The Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

31. Rapoport, A. (1988). Experiments with N-person social traps I. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32 (3), 457–472.10.1177/0022002788032003003Search in Google Scholar

32. Rennie, M. W. (1993). Born global. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 45–52Search in Google Scholar

33. Ricciardi, F. (2014). Innovation processes in business networks. Managing inter-organizational relationships for innovational excellence. Wiesbaden: Springer Global.10.1007/978-3-658-03439-9Search in Google Scholar

34. Ring, P. S., Van de Ven, A. (1989). Cooperative relationships between organizations. The Strategic Management Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (working paper).Search in Google Scholar

35. Schaeffer, E. (2017). Industry X. 0. Realizing digital value in industrial sectors. Munich: Kogan Page.Search in Google Scholar

36. Stuart, T. E. (2000). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (8), 791–81110.1002/1097-0266(200008)21:8<791::AID-SMJ121>3.0.CO;2-KSearch in Google Scholar

37. Thompson, F. G. (2003). Between hierarchies & markets. The logic and limits of network forms of organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198775270.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

38. Thomson, G. F. (2003). Between Hierarchies & Markets. The Logic and Limits of Network Forms of Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198775270.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

39. Wang, H., Yang, B. Z. (2003). Classification of 2x2 games and strategic behavior. American Economist, 47 (2), 78–85.10.1177/056943450304700207Search in Google Scholar

40. Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (2). 269–296.10.2307/2393356Search in Google Scholar

41. Witek–Hajduk, M. K. (2014). Internationalization of enterprises — selected theoretical concepts and research directions. Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics.Search in Google Scholar

42. Wróblewski, Ł. (2015). Websites of Polish Cultural and Educational Organizations in the Czech Republic — Analysis and Evaluation. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 3 (1), 65–78.Search in Google Scholar

43. Yi, R., Johnson, M. W., Bickel, W. K. (2005). Relationship between cooperation in an iterated prisoners dilemma game and the discounting of hypothetical outcomes. Learning & Behavior, 33, 324–336.10.3758/BF03192861Search in Google Scholar