[1. Aleksejenko, I., & Kosenko K. (2012). National Report of Latvia. NKG Working Group on Geoid and Height System, Latvian Geospatial Information Agency. Retrieved from http://www.nkg.fi/nkg/sites/default/files/WGGHS2012_NKG_Geoid_Heght_KKosenko.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Aleksejenko, I., Sakne, J., Kalinka, M., Reiniks, M., Krikstaponis, B., Parseliunas, E.K., Petroskevicius, P., & Viskontas, P. (2012). The united geodetic vertical network of Latvia and Lithuania. Geodesy and Cartography, 38(1), 9–19.10.3846/20296991.2012.679800]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Ellmann, A. (2012). Considerations on the further improvements of regional geoid modelling over the Baltic countries. Geodezija ir Kartografija, 36(1), 5–15.10.3846/gc.2010.01]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Ellmann, A. (2004). The geoid for the Baltic countries determined by the least squares modification of Stoke’s formula. Doctoral Dissertation in Geodesy. Stocholm: Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Department of Infrastructure.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Esri Support GIS Dictionary. (2017). Definition of geoid. Retrieved from https://support.esri.com/en/other-resources/gis-dictionary/term/geoid]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Forsberg, R., Kaminskis, J., & Solheim, D. (1997). Geoid of the Nordic and Baltic Region from gravimetry and satellite altimetry. In J. Segawa, H. Fujimoto& S. Okubo (Eds.), Gravity, geoid and marine geodesy. (pp. 540–547). IAG Symp. Series, 117, Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-03482-8_72]Search in Google Scholar
[7. International Centre for Global Earth Models. Retrieved from http://icgem.gfz-potsdam.de/ICGEM]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Jäger, R., Kaminskis, J., Strauhmanis, J., & Younis, G. (2012). Determination of quasi-geoid as height component of the geodetic infrastructure for GNSS positioning services in the Baltic States. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences, 3, 5–15.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Janpaule, I., Jaeger, R., Younis, G., Kaminskis, J., & Zariņš, A. (2013). DFHRS-based computation of quasi-geoid of Latvia. Geodesy and Cartography, 39(1), 11–17. ISSN 2029-6991.10.3846/20296991.2013.788827]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Janpaule, I. (2014). Latvijas ģeoīda modeļa precizitātes uzlabošanas iespējas. [Latvian geoid model’s accuracy improvement opportunities]. In 72nd Scientific Conference of the University of Latvia, Astronomy and Geodesy Section, 5 February 2014, Latvia.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Jivall, L., Kaminskis, J., & Parseliunas, E. (2008). Improvement and extension of ETRS 89 in Latvia and Lithuania based on the NKG 2003 GPS campaign. EUREF Publication No.16 (Band 40), (pp. 156–162), Frankfurt am Main.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Jürgenson, H. (2002). Estonian geoid and other reference surfaces. Geodezija ir Kartografija, 28(3), 108–111.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Jürgenson, H., Türk, K., & Randjärv, J. (2011). Determination and evaluation of the Estonian fitted geoid model EST-GEOID 2003. Geodesy and Cartography, 37(1), 15–21.10.3846/13921541.2011.558339]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Kaminskis, J. (2009). Apvienotais Latvijas gravimetriskais ģeoīds [Joint gravimetric geoid of Latvia]. Geomatics, 5, 13–20.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Kaminskis, J. (2010). Geoid model for surveying in Latvia. In International FIG Congress “Facing the Challenges – Building the Capacity”, 10–16 April 2010 (pp. 1–7). Australia, Sidney.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Kaminskis, J. (2010). Geoid model in Latvia and its development. PhD Thesis. Riga: RTU. ISBN 978-9934-507-27-4]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Kaminskis, J., Janpaule, I., Zarins, A., & Rothacher, M. (2016). Latvian digital zenith camera in test applications. In Proceedings of NKG 2014 General Assembly, 1–4 September 2014 (pp. 122–125). Gothenburg, Sweden, ISSN 0280-5731.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Kaminskis, J., Vallis, A., Geipele, I., Stamure, I., Reiniks, M., & Krutova, U. (2017). Evaluation of the updated regional transition Q-geoid model. In EUREF Symposia 2017, 17–19 May 2017. Wroclaw. Retrieved from http://www.euref.eu/symposia/2017Wroclaw/02-11-Kaminskis.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Lantmäteriet, SWEN08_RH2000 & SWEN08_RH70. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.lantmateriet.se/en/Maps-and-geographic-information/GPS-and-geodetic-surveys/Geodesy/Transformations/Geoid-models/]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Märdla, S. Oja, T., & Ellmann, A. (2014). Investigations towards the NKG2014 geoid model in Estonia. Abstract Book for the NKG General Assembly. Retrieved from https://www.lantmateriet.se/globalassets/kartor-och-geografisk-information/gps-och-matning/geodesi/rapporter_publikationer/rapporter/lantmaterirapport-2016-4-nkg-general-assembly-2014.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Petroškevičius, P., & Paršeliūnas, E. (1995). Determination of the Lithuanian territory geoid. Geodezija ir Kartografija, 21(2), 50–58.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Sas-Uhrynowski, A., Mroczek, S., Sas, A., Petroškevičius, P., Obuchowski, R., & Rimkus, D. (2002). Establishment of Lithuanian national gravimetric first order network. Geodezija ir Kartografija,28(3), 75–82.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Sproģis, V., & Aleksejenko, I., (2014). Q-geoid model LV′14. Latvian Geospatial Information Agency. Retrieved from http://www.lgia.gov.lv/~/media/LGIA/Aktual14/Kvazogeoida_modelis_LV14_22112014.ashx]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Torge, W. (2001). Geodesy (3rd ed.). Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110879957]Search in Google Scholar