Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Combining Multiple Methods in Establishment Questionnaire Testing: The 2017 Census of Agriculture Testing Bento Box

Journal of Official Statistics's Cover Image
Journal of Official Statistics
Special Issue on Establishment Surveys (ICES-V)

Zitieren

Couper, M. 2008. Designing Effective Web Surveys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511499371Search in Google Scholar

Creswell, J.W. 2014. A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Dillman, D. and C. Redline. 2004. “Testing Paper Self-Administered Questionnaires: Cognitive Interview and Field Test Comparisons.” In Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires, edited by S. Presser, J. Rothgeb, M. Couper, J. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, and E. Singer, 299–317. New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.10.1002/0471654728.ch15Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, W.S. and D. Cantor. 1991. “Toward a Response Model in Establishment Surveys.” In Measurement Errors in Surveys, edited by P. Biemer, R. Groves, L. Lyberg, N. Mathiowetz, and S. Sudman, 211–233. New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118150382.ch12Search in Google Scholar

Forsyth, B., J. Rothgeb, and G. Willis. 2004. “Does Pretesting Make a Difference? An Experimental Test.” In Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires, edited by S. Presser, J. Rothgeb, M. Couper, J. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, and E. Singer, 525–546, New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.10.1002/0471654728.ch25Search in Google Scholar

Fowler, F. 2004. “The Case for More Split-Sample Experiment in Developing Survey Instruments.” In Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires, edited by S. Presser, J. Rothgeb, M. Couper, J. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, and E. Singer, 173–188. New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.10.1002/0471654728.ch9Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M., F.J. Fowler Jr, M. Couper, J. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. 2009. Survey Methodology. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Madans, J., K. Miller, A. Maitland, and G. Willis. 2011. Question Evaluation Methods: Contributing to the Science of Data Quality. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118037003Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. 2013. “Getting Your Money’s Worth: Targeting Resources to Make Cognitive Interviews Most Effective.” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods: American Statistical Association. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/ (accessed November 2017).Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. 2016. “Planning Your Multi-method Questionnaire Testing Bento Box: Examples from the 2017 Census of Agriculture Testing.” Paper presented at the 2016 International Conference on Questionnaire Design, Development, Evaluation, and Testing (QDET2). Miami, Florida. Available at: https://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/qdet2/OnlineProgram/Program.cfm (accessed November 2017).Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. 2017. “Multi-use Field Testing: Examples from the 2017 Census of Agriculture Dry Run.” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods: American Statistical Association. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/ (accessed November 2017).Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. and D. Buysse. 2010. “Bento Box Questionnaire Testing: Multi-Method Questionnaire Testing for the 2012 Census of Agriculture.” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods: American Statistical Association. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/ (accessed November 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Moore, D., K. Ott, and A. Gertseva. 2016. “Developing and Evaluating a Short Form: Results and Recommendations from Tests of a Form Designed to Reduce Questionnaire Length.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Establishment Surveys, June 20–23, 2016. Geneva, Switzerland: American Statistical Association.Search in Google Scholar

Office of Management and Budget. 2016. Statistical Policy Working Paper 47: Evaluating Survey Questions: An Inventory of Methods. Washington, DC.Search in Google Scholar

Olson, K. 2010. “An Examination of Questionnaire Evaluation by Expert Reviewers.” Field Methods 22(4): 295–318.10.1177/1525822X10379795Search in Google Scholar

Ott, K., P. McGovern, and R. Sirkis. 2016. “Using Analysis of Field Test Results to Evaluate Questionnaire Performance.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Establishment Surveys, June 20–23, 2016. Geneva, Switzerland: American Statistical Association.Search in Google Scholar

Persson, A., A. Bjornram, E. Elvers, and E. Erikson. 2015. “A Strategy to Test Questionnaires at a National Statistical Office.” Statistical Journal of the IAOS 31: 297–304.10.3233/sji-140863Search in Google Scholar

Phipps, P. S. Butani, and Y. Chun. 1995. “Research on Establishment Survey Questionnaire Design.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 7: 337–346.10.1080/07350015.1995.10524607Search in Google Scholar

Presser, S., and J. Blair. 1994. “Survey Pretesting: Do Different Methods Produce Different Results?” Sociological Methodology 24: 73–104.10.2307/270979Search in Google Scholar

Presser, S., J. Rothgeb, M. Couper, J. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, and E. Singer. 2004. Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires. New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.10.1002/0471654728Search in Google Scholar

Ridolfo, H., V. Harris, J. McCarthy, D. Miller, N. Sedransk, and L. Young. 2016. “Developing and Testing New Survey Questions: The Example of New Questions on the Role of Women and New/Beginning Farm Operators.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Establishment Surveys, June 20-23, 2016, Geneva, Switzerland: American Statistical Association.Search in Google Scholar

Schaeffer, N.C. and J. Dykema. 2004. “A Multiple-Method Approach to Improving the Clarity of Closely Related Concepts.” In Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires, edited by S. Presser, J. Rothgeb, M. Couper, J. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, and E. Singer, 475–502. New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.10.1002/0471654728.ch23Search in Google Scholar

Snijkers, G., G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D. Willimack. 2013. Designing and Conducting Business Surveys. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118447895Search in Google Scholar

Stettler, K., D. Willimack, and A. Anderson. 2001. “Adapting Cognitive Interview Methodologies to Compensate for Unique Characteristics of Establishments.” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods: American Statistical Association. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/ (accessed November 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Tuttle, A., R. Morrison, and D. Willimack. 2010. “From Start to Pilot: A Multi-method Approach to the Comprehensive Redesign of an Economic Survey Questionnaire.” Journal of Official Statistics 26(1): 87–103.Search in Google Scholar

Willimack, D. 2013. “Methods for the Development, Testing, and Evaluation of Data Collection Instruments.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by Snijkers, G., G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D. Willimack, 253–301. New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118447895.ch07Search in Google Scholar

Willimack, D. and E. Nichols. 2010. “A Hybrid Response Process Model for Business Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 26(1): 3–24.Search in Google Scholar

Willis, G.B. 2004. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Willis, G.B. 2015. Analysis of the Cognitive Interview in Questionnaire Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Yan, T., F. Kreuter, and R. Tourangeau. 2012. “Evaluating Survey Questions: A Comparison of Methods.” Journal of Official Statistics 2: 503–529.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2001-7367
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Mathematik, Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Statistik