[Couper, M. 2008. Designing Effective Web Surveys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511499371]Search in Google Scholar
[Creswell, J.W. 2014. A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillman, D. and C. Redline. 2004. “Testing Paper Self-Administered Questionnaires: Cognitive Interview and Field Test Comparisons.” In Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires, edited by S. Presser, J. Rothgeb, M. Couper, J. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, and E. Singer, 299–317. New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.10.1002/0471654728.ch15]Search in Google Scholar
[Edwards, W.S. and D. Cantor. 1991. “Toward a Response Model in Establishment Surveys.” In Measurement Errors in Surveys, edited by P. Biemer, R. Groves, L. Lyberg, N. Mathiowetz, and S. Sudman, 211–233. New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118150382.ch12]Search in Google Scholar
[Forsyth, B., J. Rothgeb, and G. Willis. 2004. “Does Pretesting Make a Difference? An Experimental Test.” In Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires, edited by S. Presser, J. Rothgeb, M. Couper, J. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, and E. Singer, 525–546, New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.10.1002/0471654728.ch25]Search in Google Scholar
[Fowler, F. 2004. “The Case for More Split-Sample Experiment in Developing Survey Instruments.” In Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires, edited by S. Presser, J. Rothgeb, M. Couper, J. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, and E. Singer, 173–188. New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.10.1002/0471654728.ch9]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M., F.J. Fowler Jr, M. Couper, J. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. 2009. Survey Methodology. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Madans, J., K. Miller, A. Maitland, and G. Willis. 2011. Question Evaluation Methods: Contributing to the Science of Data Quality. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118037003]Search in Google Scholar
[McCarthy, J. 2013. “Getting Your Money’s Worth: Targeting Resources to Make Cognitive Interviews Most Effective.” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods: American Statistical Association. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/ (accessed November 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[McCarthy, J. 2016. “Planning Your Multi-method Questionnaire Testing Bento Box: Examples from the 2017 Census of Agriculture Testing.” Paper presented at the 2016 International Conference on Questionnaire Design, Development, Evaluation, and Testing (QDET2). Miami, Florida. Available at: https://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/qdet2/OnlineProgram/Program.cfm (accessed November 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[McCarthy, J. 2017. “Multi-use Field Testing: Examples from the 2017 Census of Agriculture Dry Run.” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods: American Statistical Association. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/ (accessed November 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[McCarthy, J. and D. Buysse. 2010. “Bento Box Questionnaire Testing: Multi-Method Questionnaire Testing for the 2012 Census of Agriculture.” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods: American Statistical Association. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/ (accessed November 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Moore, D., K. Ott, and A. Gertseva. 2016. “Developing and Evaluating a Short Form: Results and Recommendations from Tests of a Form Designed to Reduce Questionnaire Length.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Establishment Surveys, June 20–23, 2016. Geneva, Switzerland: American Statistical Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[Office of Management and Budget. 2016. Statistical Policy Working Paper 47: Evaluating Survey Questions: An Inventory of Methods. Washington, DC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Olson, K. 2010. “An Examination of Questionnaire Evaluation by Expert Reviewers.” Field Methods 22(4): 295–318.10.1177/1525822X10379795]Search in Google Scholar
[Ott, K., P. McGovern, and R. Sirkis. 2016. “Using Analysis of Field Test Results to Evaluate Questionnaire Performance.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Establishment Surveys, June 20–23, 2016. Geneva, Switzerland: American Statistical Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[Persson, A., A. Bjornram, E. Elvers, and E. Erikson. 2015. “A Strategy to Test Questionnaires at a National Statistical Office.” Statistical Journal of the IAOS 31: 297–304.10.3233/sji-140863]Search in Google Scholar
[Phipps, P. S. Butani, and Y. Chun. 1995. “Research on Establishment Survey Questionnaire Design.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 7: 337–346.10.1080/07350015.1995.10524607]Search in Google Scholar
[Presser, S., and J. Blair. 1994. “Survey Pretesting: Do Different Methods Produce Different Results?” Sociological Methodology 24: 73–104.10.2307/270979]Search in Google Scholar
[Presser, S., J. Rothgeb, M. Couper, J. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, and E. Singer. 2004. Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires. New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.10.1002/0471654728]Search in Google Scholar
[Ridolfo, H., V. Harris, J. McCarthy, D. Miller, N. Sedransk, and L. Young. 2016. “Developing and Testing New Survey Questions: The Example of New Questions on the Role of Women and New/Beginning Farm Operators.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Establishment Surveys, June 20-23, 2016, Geneva, Switzerland: American Statistical Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schaeffer, N.C. and J. Dykema. 2004. “A Multiple-Method Approach to Improving the Clarity of Closely Related Concepts.” In Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires, edited by S. Presser, J. Rothgeb, M. Couper, J. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, and E. Singer, 475–502. New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.10.1002/0471654728.ch23]Search in Google Scholar
[Snijkers, G., G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D. Willimack. 2013. Designing and Conducting Business Surveys. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118447895]Search in Google Scholar
[Stettler, K., D. Willimack, and A. Anderson. 2001. “Adapting Cognitive Interview Methodologies to Compensate for Unique Characteristics of Establishments.” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods: American Statistical Association. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/ (accessed November 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Tuttle, A., R. Morrison, and D. Willimack. 2010. “From Start to Pilot: A Multi-method Approach to the Comprehensive Redesign of an Economic Survey Questionnaire.” Journal of Official Statistics 26(1): 87–103.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willimack, D. 2013. “Methods for the Development, Testing, and Evaluation of Data Collection Instruments.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by Snijkers, G., G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D. Willimack, 253–301. New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118447895.ch07]Search in Google Scholar
[Willimack, D. and E. Nichols. 2010. “A Hybrid Response Process Model for Business Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 26(1): 3–24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willis, G.B. 2004. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willis, G.B. 2015. Analysis of the Cognitive Interview in Questionnaire Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yan, T., F. Kreuter, and R. Tourangeau. 2012. “Evaluating Survey Questions: A Comparison of Methods.” Journal of Official Statistics 2: 503–529.]Search in Google Scholar