This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Khan IA, Nair CK. Clinical, diagnostic and management perspectives of aortic dissection. Elsevier Chest. 2002; 122(1): 311–28. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.122.1.311KhanIANairCKClinical, diagnostic and management perspectives of aortic dissectionElsevier Chest2002122131128https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.122.1.31110.1378/chest.122.1.31112114376Search in Google Scholar
Heuser J. Distributed under a CC-BY-SA-3.0 license Wikimedia Commons. 2016.HeuserJDistributed under a CC-BY-SA-3.0 license Wikimedia Commons2016Search in Google Scholar
Patchett N. Distributed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license. Wikimedia Commons. 2015.PatchettNDistributed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 licenseWikimedia Commons.2015Search in Google Scholar
Altamirano-Diaz L, Welisch E, Dempsey AA, Park TS, Grattan M, Norozi K. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output in children with repaired coarctation of the aorta using electrical cardiometry compared to transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Physiol Meas. 2018; 17;39(5): 055003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/aac02bAltamirano-DiazLWelischEDempseyAAParkTSGrattanMNoroziKNon-invasive measurement of cardiac output in children with repaired coarctation of the aorta using electrical cardiometry compared to transthoracic Doppler echocardiographyPhysiol Meas201817;395055003https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/aac02b10.1088/1361-6579/aac02b29695645Search in Google Scholar
Reinbacher-Köstinger A, Badeli V, Biro O, Magele C. Numerical simulation of conductivity changes in the human thorax caused by aortic dissection. IEEE Trans. Magnetic. 2019;55(6): 5100304. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2019.2895418Reinbacher-KöstingerABadeliVBiroOMageleCNumerical simulation of conductivity changes in the human thorax caused by aortic dissectionIEEE Trans. Magnetic.20195565100304https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2019.289541810.1109/TMAG.2019.2895418Search in Google Scholar
Badeli V, Reinbacher-Köstinger A, Biro O, Magele C. Numerical simulation of impedance cardiogram changes in case of chronic aortic dissection. Springer, Singapore. 2020; In: Bertemes-Filho P. (eds) 17th International Conference on Electrical Bioimpedance. ICEBI 2019. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3498-6_9BadeliVReinbacher-KöstingerABiroOMageleCNumerical simulation of impedance cardiogram changes in case of chronic aortic dissectionSpringerSingapore2020In:Bertemes-FilhoP.(eds)17th International Conference on Electrical BioimpedanceICEBI 2019. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3498-6_910.1007/978-981-13-3498-6_9Search in Google Scholar
Reinbacher-Köstinger A, Badeli V, Melito GM, Magele C, Biro O. Numerical simulation of various electrode configurations in impedance cardiography to identify aortic dissection. Springer, Singapore. 2020; In: Bertemes-Filho P. (eds) 17th International Conference on Electrical Bioimpedance. ICEBI 2019. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3498-6_7Reinbacher-KöstingerABadeliVMelitoGMMageleCBiroONumerical simulation of various electrode configurations in impedance cardiography to identify aortic dissectionSpringerSingapore2020In:Bertemes-FilhoP.(eds)17th International Conference on Electrical BioimpedanceICEBI 2019. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3498-6_710.1007/978-981-13-3498-6_7Search in Google Scholar
Bernstein DP. Impedance cardiography: Pulsatile blood flow and the biophysical and electrodynamic basis for the stroke volume equations. J Electr Bioimp. 2010; 1: 2–17. https://doi.org/10.5617/jeb.51BernsteinDPImpedance cardiography: Pulsatile blood flow and the biophysical and electrodynamic basis for the stroke volume equationsJ Electr Bioimp20101217https://doi.org/10.5617/jeb.5110.5617/jeb.51Search in Google Scholar
Ulbrich M, Muhlsteff J, Leonhardt S, Walter M. Influence of physiological sources on the impedance cardiogram analyzed using 4D FEM simulations. Physiol. Meas. 2014; 35: 1451–1468. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/35/7/1451UlbrichMMuhlsteffJLeonhardtSWalterMInfluence of physiological sources on the impedance cardiogram analyzed using 4D FEM simulationsPhysiol. Meas20143514511468https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/35/7/145110.1088/0967-3334/35/7/145124901446Search in Google Scholar
de Sitter A, Verdaasdonk RM, Faes TJC. Do mathematical model studies settle the controversy on the origin of cardiac synchronous transthoracic electrical impedance variations? A systematic review. Physiol. Meas. 2016; 37: R88–R108. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/37/9/r88de SitterAVerdaasdonkRMFaesTJCDo mathematical model studies settle the controversy on the origin of cardiac synchronous transthoracic electrical impedance variations? A systematic reviewPhysiol. Meas.201637R88R108https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/37/9/r8810.1088/0967-3334/37/9/R8827531544Search in Google Scholar
Alastruey J, Xiao N, Fok H, Schaeffter T, Figueroa CA. On the impact of modelling assumptions in multi-scale, subject-specific models of aortic haemodynamics. J. Roy. Soc. Interface. 2016; 13(119): 20160073. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0073AlastrueyJXiaoNFokHSchaeffterTFigueroaCAOn the impact of modelling assumptions in multi-scale, subject-specific models of aortic haemodynamicsJ. Roy. Soc. Interface20161311920160073. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.007310.1098/rsif.2016.0073493807927307511Search in Google Scholar
Visser KR. Electric properties of flowing blood and impedance cardiography. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 1989; 17: 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02368066VisserKRElectric properties of flowing blood and impedance cardiographyAnn. Biomed. Eng198917463473https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0236806610.1007/BF023680662610418Search in Google Scholar
Hoetink AE, Faes TJ, Visser KR, Heethaar RM. On the flow dependency of the electrical conductivity of blood. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2004; 51(7): 1251–1261. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2004.827263HoetinkAEFaesTJVisserKRHeethaarRMOn the flow dependency of the electrical conductivity of bloodIEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng200451712511261https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2004.82726310.1109/TBME.2004.82726315248541Search in Google Scholar
Fuji M, Nakajima K, Sakamoto K, Kanai H. Orientation and deformation of erythrocytes in flowing blood. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1999; 873(1): 245–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09473.xFujiMNakajimaKSakamotoKKanaiHOrientation and deformation of erythrocytes in flowing bloodAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences1999873124561https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09473.x10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09473.x10372174Search in Google Scholar
Gaw RL, Cornish BH, Thomas BJ. The electrical impedance of pulsatile blood flowing through rigid tubes: an experimental investigation. 13th International Conference on Electrical Bioimpedance and the 8th Conference on Electrical Impedance Tomography. 2007; pp. 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73841-1_22GawRLCornishBHThomasBJThe electrical impedance of pulsatile blood flowing through rigid tubes: an experimental investigation13th International Conference on Electrical Bioimpedance and the 8th Conference on Electrical Impedance Tomography20077376https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73841-1_2210.1007/978-3-540-73841-1_22Search in Google Scholar
Gaw RL, Cornish BH, Thomas BJ. The electrical impedance of pulsatile blood flowing through rigid tubes: A theoretical investigation. IEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering. 2008; 55(2): 721–727. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2007.903531GawRLCornishBHThomasBJThe electrical impedance of pulsatile blood flowing through rigid tubes: A theoretical investigationIEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering2008552721727https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2007.90353110.1109/TBME.2007.90353118270009Search in Google Scholar
COMSOL Multiphysics. v. 5.3. COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden.COMSOL Multiphysicsv. 5.3. COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden.Search in Google Scholar
Mansouri S, Alhadidi T, Chabchoub S, Salah RB. Impedance cardiography: Recent applications and developments. Biomedical Research. 2018; 29 (19): 3542–3552. https://doi.org/10.4066/biomedicalresearch.29-17-3479MansouriSAlhadidiTChabchoubSSalahRBImpedance cardiography: Recent applications and developmentsBiomedical Research2018291935423552https://doi.org/10.4066/biomedicalresearch.29-17-347910.4066/biomedicalresearch.29-17-3479Search in Google Scholar
Gabriel S. The dielectric properties of biological tissues. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 1996; 41: 2231–2249.GabrielSThe dielectric properties of biological tissuesPhysics in Medicine and Biology1996412231224910.1088/0031-9155/41/11/0018938024Search in Google Scholar
Chen D, Müller-Eschner M, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Barber D, Böckler D, Hose R, Ventikos Y. A patient-specific study of Type-B aortic dissection: evaluation of true-false lumen blood exchange. BioMedical Engineering OnLine. 2012; 12: 65. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925x-12-65ChenDMüller-EschnerMvon Tengg-KobligkHBarberDBöcklerDHoseRVentikosYA patient-specific study of Type-B aortic dissection: evaluation of true-false lumen blood exchangeBioMedical Engineering OnLine20121265https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925x-12-6510.1186/1475-925X-12-65373400723829346Search in Google Scholar
Cheng Z, Tan FP, Riga CV, Bicknell CD, Hamady MS, Gibbs RG, Wood NB, Xu XY. Analysis of flow patterns in a patient-specific aortic dissection model. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2010; 132(5), 051007. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4000964ChengZTanFPRigaCVBicknellCDHamadyMSGibbsRGWoodNBXuXYAnalysis of flow patterns in a patient-specific aortic dissection modelJournal of Biomechanical Engineering20101325051007. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.400096410.1115/1.400096420459208Search in Google Scholar
Sobol’ IM. Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Math Modeling Comput Exp. 1993; 1: 407–14.Sobol’IMSensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical modelsMath Modeling Comput Exp1993140714Search in Google Scholar
Saltelli A. et al. Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. John Wiley & Sons. 2008.SaltelliA.Global sensitivity analysis: the primerJohn Wiley & Sons200810.1002/9780470725184Search in Google Scholar
Sudret B. Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2008; 93(7): 964–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.002SudretBGlobal sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansionsReliability Engineering & System Safety2008937964979https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.00210.1016/j.ress.2007.04.002Search in Google Scholar
Crestaux T, Maître OL, Martinez J-M. Polynomial chaos expansion for sensitivity analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2009; 94.7: 1161–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.10.008CrestauxTMaîtreOLMartinezJ-MPolynomial chaos expansion for sensitivity analysisReliability Engineering & System Safety200994711611172https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.10.00810.1016/j.ress.2008.10.008Search in Google Scholar
Xiu D, Karniadakis GE. The Wiener – Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. 2002; 24.2: 619–644. https://doi.org/10.1137/s1064827501387826XiuDKarniadakisGEThe Wiener – Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equationsSIAM Journal on Scientific Computing2002242619644https://doi.org/10.1137/s106482750138782610.21236/ADA460654Search in Google Scholar
Alexanderian A, Gremaud PA, Smith RC. Variance-based sensitivity analysis for time-dependent processes. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2019; 106722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106722AlexanderianAGremaudPASmithRCVariance-based sensitivity analysis for time-dependent processesReliability Engineering & System Safety2019106722https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.10672210.1016/j.ress.2019.106722Search in Google Scholar
Marelli S, Lamas C, Sudret B. UQLab user manual - Sensitivity analysis. Report UQLab-V1.3–106, Chair of Risk, Safety & Uncertainty Quantification, ETH Zurich. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413609.257MarelliSLamasCSudretBUQLab user manual - Sensitivity analysisReport UQLab-V1.3–106, Chair of Risk,Safety & Uncertainty Quantification, ETH Zurich2019https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413609.25710.1061/9780784413609.257Search in Google Scholar
Marelli S, Sudret B. UQLab user manual - Polynomial Chaos Expansions. Report UQLab-V1.3–104, Chair of Risk, Safety & Uncertainty Quantification, ETH Zurich. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413609.257MarelliSSudretBUQLab user manual - Polynomial Chaos ExpansionsReport UQLab-V1.3–104, Chair of Risk,Safety & Uncertainty Quantification, ETH Zurich2019https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413609.25710.1061/9780784413609.257Search in Google Scholar
Wolak A, et al. Aortic size assessment by noncontrast cardiac computed tomography: normal limits by age, gender, and body surface area. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2008; 1(2): 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.11.005WolakAAortic size assessment by noncontrast cardiac computed tomography: normal limits by age, gender, and body surface areaJACC: Cardiovascular Imaging200812200209https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.11.00510.1016/j.jcmg.2007.11.00519356429Search in Google Scholar
Bernstein DP, Lemmens HJM. Stroke volume equation for impedance cardiography. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 2005; 43(4): 443–450.BernsteinDPLemmensHJMStroke volume equation for impedance cardiographyMedical & Biological Engineering & Computing200543444345010.1007/BF0234472416255425Search in Google Scholar