Login
Registrieren
Passwort zurücksetzen
Veröffentlichen & Verteilen
Verlagslösungen
Vertriebslösungen
Themen
Allgemein
Altertumswissenschaften
Architektur und Design
Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, Buchwissenschaft
Biologie
Chemie
Geowissenschaften
Geschichte
Industrielle Chemie
Informatik
Jüdische Studien
Kulturwissenschaften
Kunst
Linguistik und Semiotik
Literaturwissenschaft
Materialwissenschaft
Mathematik
Medizin
Musik
Pharmazie
Philosophie
Physik
Rechtswissenschaften
Sozialwissenschaften
Sport und Freizeit
Technik
Theologie und Religion
Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Veröffentlichungen
Zeitschriften
Bücher
Konferenzberichte
Verlage
Blog
Kontakt
Suche
EUR
USD
GBP
Deutsch
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Warenkorb
Home
Zeitschriften
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
Band 10 (2019): Heft 1 (January 2019)
Uneingeschränkter Zugang
Electrical impedance myography for assessing paraspinal muscles of patients with low back pain
Yun Wang
Yun Wang
,
Laura Freedman
Laura Freedman
,
Martin Buck
Martin Buck
,
Jose Bohorquez
Jose Bohorquez
,
Seward B. Rutkove
Seward B. Rutkove
und
John Keel
John Keel
| 31. Dez. 2019
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
Band 10 (2019): Heft 1 (January 2019)
Über diesen Artikel
Vorheriger Artikel
Nächster Artikel
Zusammenfassung
Artikel
Figuren und Tabellen
Referenzen
Autoren
Artikel in dieser Ausgabe
Vorschau
PDF
Zitieren
Teilen
Online veröffentlicht:
31. Dez. 2019
Seitenbereich:
103 - 109
Eingereicht:
29. Nov. 2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2019-0015
Schlüsselwörter
Low back pain
,
paraspinal muscles
,
electrical impedance
,
radiculopathy
,
musculoskeletal
,
bioimpedance
,
asymmetry
,
age
,
body mass index
© 2019 Yun Wang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Figure 1
A. The Myolex mViewTM system for neuromuscular assessment, including laptop, power convertor box, impedance measuring unit, and electrode array; B. Detail of electrode array used in this study; magenta-current emitting, blue-voltage sensing. Only data from these 4 electrodes were used in this analysis.
Figure 2
Typical multifrequency data obtained from with the mView impedance-measuring system shown in Figure 1. This data is from a 34-year-old healthy volunteer.
Figure 3
A, B, C. The phase, resistance, and reactance values at 100 kHz (±standard deviation) for low back pain patients versus healthy controls. D, E, F. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots for these same values. While the population means may be different, this analytical approach has limited value in discriminating between LBP patients and healthy individuals.
Figure 4
A, B, C. Relative differences in 100 kHz values (absolute value (right-left difference /right-left average)) for low back pain patients versus healthy controls. D, E, F. ROC plots for these same values. The D-value is equal to the side-to-side difference divided by the average of both sides. While still not a strong discriminator, this approach is stronger.
Figure 5
A, B, C. Correlation between phase, resistance, and reactance values at 100 kHz and age. Both phase and reactance show a significant relationship, whereas resistance does not. D, E, F. Correlation between phase, resistance, and reactance values at 100 kHz and age. Both phase and resistance show a significant relationship, whereas reactance does not.
Demographic data
Low Back Pain Participants
Healthy Volunteer
Participants
47
86
Median age, IQR
51.0(39.5–57.5)
45.5(30.3–56.0)
Sex (male/female)
21/26
42/44
Body weight (lbs)
165.0(147.0–187.5)
162.0(136.3–197.0)
Height (inches)
67.0(64.5–70.0)
66.0(64.0–69.0)