Login
Registrieren
Passwort zurücksetzen
Veröffentlichen & Verteilen
Verlagslösungen
Vertriebslösungen
Themen
Allgemein
Altertumswissenschaften
Architektur und Design
Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, Buchwissenschaft
Biologie
Chemie
Geowissenschaften
Geschichte
Industrielle Chemie
Informatik
Jüdische Studien
Kulturwissenschaften
Kunst
Linguistik und Semiotik
Literaturwissenschaft
Materialwissenschaft
Mathematik
Medizin
Musik
Pharmazie
Philosophie
Physik
Rechtswissenschaften
Sozialwissenschaften
Sport und Freizeit
Technik
Theologie und Religion
Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Veröffentlichungen
Zeitschriften
Bücher
Konferenzberichte
Verlage
Blog
Kontakt
Suche
EUR
USD
GBP
Deutsch
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Warenkorb
Home
Zeitschriften
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
Band 9 (2018): Heft 1 (January 2018)
Uneingeschränkter Zugang
On the selection of excitation signals for the fast spectroscopy of electrical bioimpedance
Jaan Ojarand
Jaan Ojarand
und
Mart Min
Mart Min
| 31. Dez. 2018
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
Band 9 (2018): Heft 1 (January 2018)
Über diesen Artikel
Vorheriger Artikel
Nächster Artikel
Zusammenfassung
Artikel
Figuren und Tabellen
Referenzen
Autoren
Artikel in dieser Ausgabe
Vorschau
PDF
Zitieren
Teilen
Online veröffentlicht:
31. Dez. 2018
Seitenbereich:
133 - 141
Eingereicht:
11. Dez. 2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2018-0018
Schlüsselwörter
Impedance measurement
,
bioimpedance
,
signal design
,
signal to noise ratio
,
optimization
© 2018 J. Ojarand, M. Min published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Fig.1
Simplified structure of the EBI spectroscopy system.
Fig.2
Waveform (a) and magnitude spectrum (b) of the pulse with relative duration t = (64/1000).
Fig.3
Waveform (a) and magnitude spectrum (b) of the exponentially modulated short chirp with relative duration t = 0.5.
Fig.4
Rectangular waveform (a) and its magnitude spectrum (b).
Fig.5
Waveforms (a) and magnitude spectrum (b) of the step waveform with a rise time of 1/500 of the signal period. Note that the first part of the time scale is magnified by 20. Diagonal hatch illustrates the energy content of the signal starting from zero and cross-hatches the energy content of the signal starting from -1.
Fig.6
Waveforms of the sinusoidal (a) and signum-chirp (b).
Fig.7
Relative deviation of RMS magnitudes of the frequency components from their mean values of the linear sinusoidal chirp with normalized frequencies in the range from 10 to 50.
Fig.8
Relative deviation of RMS magnitudes of frequency components from their mean values of the signum chirp with normalized frequencies in the range from 10 to 50.
Fig.9
Waveform of the 3-rd order MLBS (a) and its magnitude spectrum (b).
Fig.10
BMS waveform (a) and its magnitude spectrum (b) with four equally emphasized components (frequency bins 1, 3, 5, 7).
Fig.11
BMS (a) and its magnitude spectrum (b) with rising levels of components (frequency bins 1, 3, 5, 7).
Fig.12
CF of the optimized multisine signal with a consequent frequency distribution (i = 1,2,3,4 …. k), for a k in the range from 4 to 40. A green line level corresponds to the CF of a single sine wave.
Fig.13
Normalized RMS magnitudes of consecutively and logarithmically distributed frequency components of optimized multisines (MS, dashed lines) and BMS (solid lines) vs. a number of frequency decades a signal covers.