This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Adamsky, D. P. (2008). Through the looking glass: The Soviet military-technical revolution and the American revolution in military affairs. Journal of Strategic Studies, 31(2), pp. 257–294. doi: 10.1080/01402390801940443.AdamskyD. P.2008Through the looking glass: The Soviet military-technical revolution and the American revolution in military affairsJournal of Strategic Studies31225729410.1080/01402390801940443Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Andersson, K. (2020). Notes on military capability concepts and their relevance for analysis of system characteristics. Stockholm: Swedish Defence University. Available at http://fhs.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1473159/FULLTEXT01.pdf.AnderssonK.2020Notes on military capability concepts and their relevance for analysis of system characteristicsStockholmSwedish Defence UniversityAvailable at http://fhs.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1473159/FULLTEXT01.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Andersson, K., Martin, B., Carina, M., Björn, P., Peter, S., Eva, J., et al. (2015). Military utility: A proposed concept to support decision-making. Technology in Society, 43, pp. 23–32. doi.: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.07.001.AnderssonK.MartinB.CarinaM.BjörnP.PeterS.EvaJ.2015Military utility: A proposed concept to support decision-makingTechnology in Society43233210.1016/j.techsoc.2015.07.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Antwerpen, C. V., & Bowley, D. K. (2012). An Australian approach to concept development and experimentation: Linking strategy to capability. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63(2), pp. 278–292. doi: 10.1057/jors.2011.28.AntwerpenC. V.BowleyD. K.2012An Australian approach to concept development and experimentation: Linking strategy to capabilityJournal of the Operational Research Society63227829210.1057/jors.2011.28Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Batalden, B. M., Peter, W., Johan, F. R., & Øyvind, H. (2019). Enhanced human-machine interaction by fuzzy logic in semi-autonomous maritime operations. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 784, pp. 46–54. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-94346-6_5.BataldenB. M.PeterW.JohanF. R.ØyvindH.2019Enhanced human-machine interaction by fuzzy logic in semi-autonomous maritime operationsAdvances in Intelligent Systems and Computing784465410.1007/978-3-319-94346-6_5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Baxter, G., & Sommerville, I. (2011). Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering. Interacting with Computers, 23(1), pp. 4–17. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003.BaxterG.SommervilleI.2011Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineeringInteracting with Computers23141710.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Berkowitz, B. (2014). Sea power in the robotic age. Issues in Science and Technology, 30(2), pp. 33–40.BerkowitzB.2014Sea power in the robotic ageIssues in Science and Technology3023340Search in Google Scholar
Biddle, S. (2004). Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle. Military Power. STU-Stud. Princeton University Press, Princeton.BiddleS.2004Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle. Military Power. STU-StudPrinceton University PressPrinceton10.1515/9781400837823Search in Google Scholar
British Ministry of Defence. (2020). How defence works (Version 6.0, September 2020). British Ministry of Defence. Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/920219/20200922-How_Defence_Works_V6.0_Sep_2020.pdf.British Ministry of Defence2020How defence works (Version 6.0, September 2020)British Ministry of DefenceAvailable at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/920219/20200922-How_Defence_Works_V6.0_Sep_2020.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Denscombe, M. (2010). Good Research Guide : For Small-Scale Social Research Projects, 4th edn. Open up Study Skills. Open University Press, Maidenhead.DenscombeM.2010Good Research Guide : For Small-Scale Social Research Projects4th edn.Open up Study SkillsOpen University PressMaidenheadSearch in Google Scholar
Department of Defence. (2014). Defence Capability Development Handbook 2014. Australian Government, Department of Defence, Canberra. Available at https://www.defence.gov.au/publications/docs/DefenceCapabilityDevelopmentHandbook(DCDH)2014-internetcopy.pdf.Department of Defence2014Defence Capability Development Handbook 2014Australian Government, Department of DefenceCanberraAvailable at https://www.defence.gov.au/publications/docs/DefenceCapabilityDevelopmentHandbook(DCDH)2014-internetcopy.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Deparment of Defence. (2020). Capability Life Cycle Manual (Version 2.1). Department of Defence, Canberra. Available at https://www.dica.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Capability-Life-Cycle-Manual-v2-1.pdf.Deparment of Defence2020Capability Life Cycle Manual (Version 2.1)Department of DefenceCanberraAvailable at https://www.dica.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Capability-Life-Cycle-Manual-v2-1.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Department of the Navy. (2021). Department of the Navy Unmanned Campaign Framework. Department of the Navy, Washington DC. Available at https://www.navy.mil/Portals/1/Strategic/20210315UnmannedCampaign_Final_LowRes.pdf.Department of the Navy2021Department of the Navy Unmanned Campaign FrameworkDepartment of the NavyWashington DCAvailable at https://www.navy.mil/Portals/1/Strategic/20210315UnmannedCampaign_Final_LowRes.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Dyson, T. (2019). The military as a learning organisation: Establishing the fundamentals of best-practice in lessons-learned. Defence Studies, 19(2), pp. 107–129. doi: 10.1080/14702436.2019.1573637.DysonT.2019The military as a learning organisation: Establishing the fundamentals of best-practice in lessons-learnedDefence Studies19210712910.1080/14702436.2019.1573637Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fitzsimmons, M. (2007). Whither capabilities-based planning? Joint Force Quarterly, 44(1st quarter), pp. 101–105. Available at https://ndupress.ndu.edu/portals/68/Documents/jfq/jfq-44.pdf.FitzsimmonsM.2007Whither capabilities-based planning?Joint Force Quarterly44(1st quarter),101105Available at https://ndupress.ndu.edu/portals/68/Documents/jfq/jfq-44.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Franssen, M., & Peter, K. (2009). Sociotechnical systems. In: Olsen, J. K. B., Pedersen, S. A., & Hendricks, V. F. (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chicester, pp. 223–226. doi: 10.1002/9781444310795.ch40.FranssenM.PeterK.2009Sociotechnical systemsIn:OlsenJ. K. B.PedersenS. A.HendricksV. F.(eds.),A Companion to the Philosophy of TechnologyJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.Chicester22322610.1002/9781444310795.ch40Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Friesl, M., Sackmann, S. A., & Kremser, S. (2011). Knowledge sharing in new organizational entities the impact of hierarchy, organizational context, micro-politics and suspicion. Cross Cultural Management-an International Journal, 18(1), pp. 71–86. doi: 10.1108/13527601111104304.FrieslM.SackmannS. A.KremserS.2011Knowledge sharing in new organizational entities the impact of hierarchy, organizational context, micro-politics and suspicionCross Cultural Management-an International Journal181718610.1108/13527601111104304Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Griffin, S. (2017). Military innovation studies: Multidisciplinary or lacking discipline? Journal of Strategic Studies, 40(1–2), pp. 196–224. doi: 10.1080/01402390.2016.1196358.GriffinS.2017Military innovation studies: Multidisciplinary or lacking discipline?Journal of Strategic Studies401–219622410.1080/01402390.2016.1196358Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Grissom, A. (2006). The future of military innovation studies. Journal of Strategic Studies, 29(5), pp. 905–934. doi: 10.1080/01402390600901067.GrissomA.2006The future of military innovation studiesJournal of Strategic Studies29590593410.1080/01402390600901067Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hannay, J. E., & Gjørven, E. (2021). Leveraging network-centric strategic goals in capabilities. Journal of Military Studies, 10(1), pp. 90–104. doi: 10.2478/jms-2021-0001.HannayJ. E.GjørvenE.2021Leveraging network-centric strategic goals in capabilitiesJournal of Military Studies1019010410.2478/jms-2021-0001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10 SPEC ISS.), pp. 997–1010. doi: 10.1002/smj.332.HelfatC. E.PeterafM. A.2003The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecyclesStrategic Management Journal24(10 SPEC ISS.),997101010.1002/smj.332Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ho, G., Pavlovic, N., & Arrabito, R. (2011). Human factors issues with operating unmanned underwater vehicles. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 429–33. doi: 10.1177/1071181311551088.HoG.PavlovicN.ArrabitoR.2011Human factors issues with operating unmanned underwater vehiclesInProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society4293310.1177/1071181311551088Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jakobsen, P. V. (2017). War Studies Traditionen (På Syddansk Universitet): Hvad, Hvordan, Hvad Nu? Økonomi Og Politik, 90(1), pp. 73–80. Available at https://www.djoef-forlag.dk/openaccess/oep/files/2017/1_2017/1_2017_10.pdf [accessed 3 June, 2021].JakobsenP. V.2017War Studies Traditionen (På Syddansk Universitet): Hvad, Hvordan, Hvad Nu?Økonomi Og Politik9017380Available at https://www.djoef-forlag.dk/openaccess/oep/files/2017/1_2017/1_2017_10.pdf [accessed 3 June, 2021].Search in Google Scholar
James, A. D. (2016). Emerging Technologies and Military Capability. In Bitzinger, R. A. (ed.), Emerging Critical Technologies and Security in the Asia-Pacific. . Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, pp. 6–21. doi: 10.1057/9781137461285_2.JamesA. D.2016Emerging Technologies and Military CapabilityInBitzingerR. A.(ed.),Emerging Critical Technologies and Security in the Asia-PacificPalgrave Macmillan UKLondon62110.1057/9781137461285_2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Johansson, L. (2018). Ethical aspects of military maritime and aerial autonomous systems. Journal of Military Ethics, 17(2–3), pp. 140–155. doi: 10.1080/15027570.2018.1552512.JohanssonL.2018Ethical aspects of military maritime and aerial autonomous systemsJournal of Military Ethics172–314015510.1080/15027570.2018.1552512Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kelly, J. E. (1978). A reappraisal of sociotechnical systems theory. Human Relations, 31(12), pp. 1069–1099. doi: 10.1177/001872677803101204.KellyJ. E.1978A reappraisal of sociotechnical systems theoryHuman Relations31121069109910.1177/001872677803101204Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kollars, N. (2017). Genius and mastery in military innovation. Survival, 59(2), pp. 125–138. doi: 10.1080/00396338.2017.1302193.KollarsN.2017Genius and mastery in military innovationSurvival59212513810.1080/00396338.2017.1302193Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Larsbrink, G. (2020). Obemannade Och Autonoma System, Ett Marint Paradigmskifte – Del 2. Tidskrift i Sjöväsendet, 3, pp. 249–257. Available at https://www.koms.se/tidskrift/arkiv/nr-3-20/ [accessed 15 February, 2021].LarsbrinkG.2020Obemannade Och Autonoma System, Ett Marint Paradigmskifte – Del 2Tidskrift i Sjöväsendet3249257Available at https://www.koms.se/tidskrift/arkiv/nr-3-20/ [accessed 15 February, 2021].Search in Google Scholar
Liwång, H. (2022). Defense development: The role of co-creation in filling the gap between policy-makers and technology development. Technology in Society, January, 101913. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101913.LiwångH.2022Defense development: The role of co-creation in filling the gap between policy-makers and technology developmentTechnology in Society, January10191310.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101913Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Maguer, A., Been, R., Tesei, A., Alves, J. Grandi, V., & Biagini, S. (2018). Recent technological advances in underwater autonomy. In 2018 OCEANS - MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Oceans, OCEANS – Kobe 2018, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/OCEANSKOBE.2018.8558791.MaguerA.BeenR.TeseiA.AlvesJ.GrandiV.BiaginiS.2018Recent technological advances in underwater autonomyIn2018 OCEANS - MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Oceans, OCEANS – Kobe 20181810.1109/OCEANSKOBE.2018.8558791Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Maier, M. W. (1998). Architecting principles for systems-of-systems. Systems Engineering, 1(4), 267–284. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6858(1998)1:4<267::Aid-sys3>3.0.Co;2-d.MaierM. W.1998Architecting principles for systems-of-systemsSystems Engineering1426728410.1002/(sici)1520-6858(1998)1:4<267::Aid-sys3>3.0.Co;2-dOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mansfield, T., Sobrino, P. C., Viñas, A. C., Maglione, G. L., Been, R., and Tremori, A. (2019). Approaches to realize the potential of autonomous underwater systems in concept development and experimentation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 11472 LNCS, pp. 614–626. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-14984-0_46.MansfieldT.SobrinoP. C.ViñasA. C.MaglioneG. L.BeenR.TremoriA.2019Approaches to realize the potential of autonomous underwater systems in concept development and experimentationInLecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)11472 LNCS,61462610.1007/978-3-030-14984-0_46Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
NATO ACT. (2021). NATO CD&E Handbook. NATO ACT, Norfolk. Available at https://www.act.nato.int/application/files/1316/1889/0702/NATO-ACT-CDE-Handbook_A_Concept_Developers_Toolbox.pdf [accessed 33 June, 2021].NATO ACT2021NATO CD&E HandbookNATO ACT, Norfolk. Available at https://www.act.nato.int/application/files/1316/1889/0702/NATO-ACT-CDE-Handbook_A_Concept_Developers_Toolbox.pdf [accessed 33 June, 2021].Search in Google Scholar
NATO Standarization Office. (2021). AAP-06 Edition 2021 NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions. NATO. Available at https://nso.nato.int/nso/nsdd/main/standards?search=aap-06 [accessed 4 February, 2022].NATO Standarization Office2021AAP-06 Edition 2021 NATO Glossary of Terms and DefinitionsNATO. Available at https://nso.nato.int/nso/nsdd/main/standards?search=aap-06 [accessed 4 February, 2022].Search in Google Scholar
Pikner, I. (2015). Concept development & experimentation as tool for capability development. International Conference Knowledge-based Organization, 21(1), pp. 88–93. doi: 10.1515/kbo-2015-0015.PiknerI.2015Concept development & experimentation as tool for capability developmentInternational Conference Knowledge-based Organization211889310.1515/kbo-2015-0015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Prives, L. (2020). A bold revolution: Bringing commercial research and development advancements to U.S. Military innovation [women to watch]. IEEE Women in Engineering Magazine, 2020. doi: 10.1109/MWIE.2020.2977524.PrivesL.2020A bold revolution: Bringing commercial research and development advancements to U.S. Military innovation [women to watch]IEEE Women in Engineering Magazine202010.1109/MWIE.2020.2977524Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Project Group SubTechSweden. (2019). NRIA-U 2019, National Research and Innovation Agenda for Undervater Technology, Last Modidied. SubTechSweden. Available at http://subtechsweden.se/agenda-nria-u-2019/. [accessed 7 January, 2021].Project Group SubTechSweden2019NRIA-U 2019, National Research and Innovation Agenda for Undervater Technology, Last ModidiedSubTechSweden. Available at http://subtechsweden.se/agenda-nria-u-2019/. [accessed 7 January, 2021].Search in Google Scholar
Rogers, R. (2012). The legal regime governing AUV operations how far and how wide. 2012 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, AUV 2012, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/AUV.2012.6380745.RogersR.2012The legal regime governing AUV operations how far and how wide2012 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, AUV 20121510.1109/AUV.2012.6380745Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Scala, N. M., & Howard, J. P. (2020). Preface. In Scala, N. M., & Howard, J. P. (eds.), Handbook of Military and Defense Operations Research. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. ix–x.ScalaN. M.HowardJ. P.2020PrefaceInScalaN. M.HowardJ. P.(eds.),Handbook of Military and Defense Operations ResearchCRC PressBoca Raton, FLixx10.1016/B978-0-85709-541-1.50028-5Search in Google Scholar
Schaefer, K. E., Hill, S. G., & Jentsch, F. G. (2019). Trust in human-autonomy teaming: A review of trust research from the US Army Research Laboratory Robotics Collaborative Technology Alliance. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 784, pp. 102–114. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-94346-6_10.SchaeferK. E.HillS. G.JentschF. G.2019Trust in human-autonomy teaming: A review of trust research from the US Army Research Laboratory Robotics Collaborative Technology AllianceAdvances in Intelligent Systems and Computing78410211410.1007/978-3-319-94346-6_10Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. N., & Goddard, D. S. (2016). International law and the military use of unmanned maritime systems. International Review of the Red Cross, 98(902), pp. 567–592. doi: 10.1017/S1816383117000339.SchmittM. N.GoddardD. S.2016International law and the military use of unmanned maritime systemsInternational Review of the Red Cross9890256759210.1017/S1816383117000339Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Smith, C. J., & Oosthuizen, R. (2012). Applying systems engineering principles towards developing defence capabilities. In 22nd Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering, INCOSE 2012 and the 8th Biennial European Systems Engineering Conference 2012, EuSEC 2012, 2: pp. 1056–1070. doi: 10.1002/j.2334-5837.2012.tb01383.x.SmithC. J.OosthuizenR.2012Applying systems engineering principles towards developing defence capabilitiesIn22nd Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering, INCOSE 2012 and the 8th Biennial European Systems Engineering Conference 2012, EuSEC 20122:1056107010.1002/j.2334-5837.2012.tb01383.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sparrow, R., & Lucas, G. (2016). When robots rule the waves? Naval War College Review, 69(4), pp. 49–78. Available at https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol69/iss4/7 [accessed 7 January, 2021].SparrowR.LucasG.2016When robots rule the waves?Naval War College Review6944978Available at https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol69/iss4/7 [accessed 7 January, 2021].Search in Google Scholar
Teeneti, C. R., Truscott, T. T., Beal, D. N., & Pantic, Z. (2019). Review of wireless charging systems for autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, pp. 1–20. doi: 10.1109/JOE.2019.2953015.TeenetiC. R.TruscottT. T.BealD. N.PanticZ.2019Review of wireless charging systems for autonomous underwater vehiclesIEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering12010.1109/JOE.2019.2953015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Thaba, J. M. (2020). Technology Support for Military Capability Based Acquisition.” In 26th International Association for Management of Technology Conference, IAMOT 2017 Vienna, 987–1000. International Association for Management of Technology (IAMOT).ThabaJ. M.2020Technology Support for Military Capability Based Acquisition.”In26th International Association for Management of Technology Conference, IAMOT 2017 Vienna9871000International Association for Management of Technology (IAMOT)Search in Google Scholar
Till, G. (2018). “Navies and Technology.” In Seapower?: A Guide for the Twenty-First Century, edited by Geoffrey Till, 4th edn., 147–82. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.TillG.2018“Navies and Technology.”InSeapower?: A Guide for the Twenty-First Centuryedited byTillGeoffrey4th edn.14782Abingdon, OxonRoutledge10.4324/9781315621210-5Search in Google Scholar
Trist, E. (1981). “The Evolution of Socio-Technical Systems: A Conceptual Framework and an Action Research Program.” Issues in the Quality of Working Life, A Series of Occasional Papers No. 2 June 1981. Ontario Ministry of Labour, Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre.TristE.1981“The Evolution of Socio-Technical Systems: A Conceptual Framework and an Action Research Program.”Issues in the Quality of Working Life, A Series of Occasional Papers No. 2 June 1981. Ontario Ministry of Labour, Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre.Search in Google Scholar
Veldhuis, G. A., de Reus, N. M., & Keijser, B. M. J, (2018). Concept development for comprehensive operations support with modeling and simulation. Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 17(1), pp. 99–116. doi: 10.1177/1548512918814407.VeldhuisG. A.de ReusN. M.KeijserB. M. J2018Concept development for comprehensive operations support with modeling and simulationJournal of Defense Modeling and Simulation1719911610.1177/1548512918814407Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vermaas, P., Kroes, P. van de Poel, I., Franssen, M., & Houkes, W. (2011). A philosophy of technology: From technical artefacts to sociotechnical systems. Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology and Society, 6. doi: 10.2200/s00321ed1v01y201012ets014.VermaasP.KroesP.van de PoelI.FranssenM.HoukesW.2011A philosophy of technology: From technical artefacts to sociotechnical systemsSynthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology and Society610.2200/s00321ed1v01y201012ets014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Walker, G. H., Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., & Jenkins, D. P. (2008). A review of sociotechnical systems theory: A classic concept for new command and control paradigms. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 9(6), pp. 479–499. doi: 10.1080/14639220701635470.WalkerG. H.StantonN. A.SalmonP. M.JenkinsD. P.2008A review of sociotechnical systems theory: A classic concept for new command and control paradigmsTheoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science9647949910.1080/14639220701635470Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Webster, L., Morris, B. A., & Dwyer, D. M. (2019). A Framework for Assessing the Impact of Integrating New Equipment onto Naval Vessels. In RINA, Royal Institution of Naval Architects - IMC 2019: Pacific International Maritime Conference, Sydney.WebsterL.MorrisB. A.DwyerD. M.2019A Framework for Assessing the Impact of Integrating New Equipment onto Naval VesselsInRINA, Royal Institution of Naval Architects - IMC 2019: Pacific International Maritime ConferenceSydneySearch in Google Scholar
Weiss, M. (2018). How to become a first mover? Mechanisms of military innovation and the development of drones. European Journal of International Security, 3(2), pp. 187–210. doi: 10.1017/eis.2017.15.WeissM.2018How to become a first mover? Mechanisms of military innovation and the development of dronesEuropean Journal of International Security3218721010.1017/eis.2017.15Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Werin, O., & Wedin, L. (2020). VÅR marin för ett tryggt sverige och ett starkt Europa – Marin Strategi 2030. Kungl Krigsvetenskapsakademin, Stockholm.WerinO.WedinL.2020VÅR marin för ett tryggt sverige och ett starkt Europa – Marin Strategi 2030Kungl KrigsvetenskapsakademinStockholmSearch in Google Scholar
Wibben, A. T. R. (2018). Why we need to study (US) militarism: A critical feminist lens. Security Dialogue, 49(1–2), pp. 136–148. doi: 10.1177/0967010617742006.WibbenA. T. R.2018Why we need to study (US) militarism: A critical feminist lensSecurity Dialogue491–213614810.1177/0967010617742006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wilcox, L. (2009). Gendering the cult of the offensive. Security Studies, 18(2), pp. 214–240. doi: 10.1080/09636410902900152.WilcoxL.2009Gendering the cult of the offensiveSecurity Studies18221424010.1080/09636410902900152Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Williams, A. (2015). Defining autonomy in systems: Challenges and solutions. In Williams, A., & Scharre, P. (eds.), Autonomous Systems: Issues for Defence Policymakers. NATO ACT, Norfolk, Virginia, pp. 27–62. Available at https://www.act.nato.int/images/stories/media/capdev/capdev_02.pdf [accessed 15 February, 2021].WilliamsA.2015Defining autonomy in systems: Challenges and solutionsInWilliamsA.ScharreP.(eds.),Autonomous Systems: Issues for Defence PolicymakersNATO ACTNorfolk, Virginia2762Available at https://www.act.nato.int/images/stories/media/capdev/capdev_02.pdf [accessed 15 February, 2021].Search in Google Scholar