The prevalence of intestinal parasite infections in goats from smallholder farms in Northern Thailand
, und
04. Mai 2022
Über diesen Artikel
Artikel-Kategorie: Research Article
Online veröffentlicht: 04. Mai 2022
Seitenbereich: 64 - 73
Eingereicht: 08. Feb. 2021
Akzeptiert: 28. Jan. 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/helm-2022-0007
Schlüsselwörter
© 2022 K. Wuthijaree, P. Tatsapong, C. Lambertz, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Prevalence of helminth infections (percentage of infected goats) in male and female goats in Northern Thailand_
Parasitic infection | Male |
Female |
X2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | + | % | Total | + | % | |||
Strongyles | 29 | 24 | 82.8 | 856 | 656 | 76.6 | 0.591 | 0.442 |
29 | 0 | 0 | 856 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.136 | 0.712 | |
29 | 0 | 0 | 856 | 8 | 0.9 | 0.274 | 0.601 | |
29 | 0 | 0 | 856 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.034 | 0.854 | |
29 | 15 | 51.7 | 856 | 430 | 50.2 | 0.025 | 0.875 | |
29 | 3 | 10.3 | 856 | 129 | 15.1 | 0.494 | 0.482 | |
Others ( |
29 | 0 | 0 | 856 | 6 | 0.7 | 0.205 | 0.651 |
Third-stage strongylid larvae identified in coprocultures of goats (expressed as mean percentage)_
Larval genus | Total (%) |
---|---|
55.84 | |
20.53 | |
5.80 | |
5.00 | |
4.18 | |
3.46 | |
3.07 | |
0.92 | |
0.85 |
Results from a predictive logistic regression model for parasitic infection in goats from Northern Thailand_
Variable | Level | β | SE | Wald | OR | P-Value | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | Male | 1 | - | - | |||
Female | -0.16 | 0.502 | 0.102 | 0.852 | 0.750 | 0.319 – 2.278 | |
Body Condition Score | Good | 1 | - | - | |||
Moderate | -0.853 | 0.718 | 1.412 | 0.426 | 0.235 | 0.104 – 1.740 | |
Thin | -1.061 | 0.529 | 4.023 | 0.346 | 0.045 | 0.123 – 0.976 |
Descriptive statistics (number and percentage of positive samples and mean, SD, Min, and Max) of fecal egg/oocyte counts in goats of 31 Smallholder Farms in Thailand_
Variables | Examined | Positive [ |
Mean | SD | Min – Max |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gastrointestinal strongyles | 885 | 680 (76.8%) | 799.0 | 1348.6 | 0 – 13333 |
885 | 4 (0.5%) | 0.2 | 3.4 | 0.58 | |
885 | 8 (0.9%) | 0.6 | 7.1 | 0 – 104 | |
885 | 1 (0.1%) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0 – 1368 | |
885 | 445 (50.3%) | 427.6 | 118.1 | 0 – 96285 | |
885 | 132 (14.2%) | 69.5 | 20.0 | 0 – 15786 | |
Others ( |
885 | 6 (0.7%) | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0 – 246 |
Contingency table and odds ratio results for association of explanatory variables with parasites positive for fecal eggs of goats, by parasites_
Variables | Infected/ Examined | Prevalence (%) | 95% CI | Odds Ratio | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stronglyes (%) | |||||
Sex | 0.402 | ||||
Female | 656/856 | 76.6 | 74.8 – 88.2 | 1.0 | |
Male | 24/29 | 82.8 | 46.7 – 91.3 | 0.654 | |
Body Condition Score | 0.163 | ||||
Good | 23/30 | 76.7 | 43.2 – 87.6 | 1.0 | |
Moderate | 613/805 | 76.1 | 73.5 – 90.3 | 0.426 | |
Poor | 44/50 | 88.0 | 76.3 – 99.7 | 0.430 | |
Sex | 0.511 | ||||
Female | 129/856 | 15.1 | 10.4 – 21.8 | 1.0 | |
Male | 3/29 | 2.3 | 1.3 – 24.9 | 0.650 | |
Body Condition Score | 0.828 | ||||
Good | 4/30 | 13.3 | 11.1 – 26.5 | 1.0 | |
Moderate | 119/805 | 14.8 | 6.3 – 20.6 | 0.735 | |
Poor | 9/50 | 18.0 | 8.1 – 27.9 | 0.799 | |
Sex | 0.895 | ||||
Female | 430/856 | 50.2 | 50.2 – 66.2 | 1.0 | |
Male | 15/29 | 51.7 | 14.2 – 66.8 | 0.895 | |
Body Condition Score | 0.009 | ||||
good | 15/30 | 50.0b | 13.2 – 65.7 | 1.0 | |
Moderate | 394/805 | 48.9b | 42.4 – 62.3 | 0.383 | |
Thin | 36/50 | 72.0a | 58.2 – 85.8 | 0.372 |
Results of the fecal egg (expressed as eggs per gram, EPG) and oocyst (expressed as oocysts per gram, OPG) counts differentiated for the prevalence of gastrointestinal strongylid nematodes (GIN) (classified as negative, low, moderate and high), separated by sex and species ( expressed as % within sex or body condition score)_
Sex |
Body condition score |
Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male | Female | Poor | Moderate | Good | ||
Gastrointestinal strongylid | nematodes | (GIN) | ||||
Mean FECc | 455.5 ± 132.8b | 810.7 ± 46.6a | 1603.3 ± 287.2A | 751.3 ± 45.4B | 738.5 ± 202.78B | 802.1 ± 45.4 |
Negative | 17.2 | 22.8 | 12.0 | 23.2 | 23.3 | 22.6 |
Low (< 500 EPG) | 51.7 | 38.3 | 38.0 | 38.8 | 40.0 | 38.8 |
Moderate (500 – 1000 EPG) | 17.2 | 13.6 | 6.0 | 14.0 | 16.7 | 13.7 |
High (> 1000 EPG) | 13.8 | 25.4 | 44.0 | 24.0 | 20.0 | 25.0 |
Mean FOCc | 591.1 ± 245.1 | 422.0 ± 121.8 | 172.8 ± 118.1 | 412.8 ± 124.9 | 1248.9 ± 945.8 | 427.6 ± 118.1 |
Negative | 48.3 | 49.5 | 28.0 | 50.8 | 50.0 | 49.5 |
Low (< 1800 OPG) | 37.9 | 47.0 | 72.0 | 45.2 | 43.3 | 46.7 |
Moderate (1800 – 6000 OPG) | 13.8 | 2.7 | 0 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.1 |
High (> 6000 OPG) | 0 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 0.8 |