Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Meiotic behaviour and pollen fertility of F1, F2 and BC1 progenies of Iris dichotoma and I. domestica


Zitieren

INTRODUCTION

Iris dichotoma and I. domestica are herbaceous perennials belonging to the family Iridaceae, with a diploid chromosome number of 2n=2x=32 native to China, and have a long flowering period in summer and high resistance to cold, drought and barren conditions, which make them excellent materials for iris breeding (Zheng et al., 2017). Therefore, I. dichotoma and I. domestica have been attracting the attention of plant breeders (Bi et al., 2012). In nature, I. dichotoma is found with violet, yellow and white flowers, but no red or orange flowers. Its individual flowers stay open for about 4 h in form the late afternoon to the early evening (Luo et al., 2016). To improve its flower colour and flowering time, interspecific crosses were conducted to introgress useful genes from I. domestica to I. dichotoma and this has resulted in some novel varieties (Yang et al., 2013; Lian et al., 2016; Ruan et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2017; Gao et al., 2020). Previous studies concentrated on violet and white-flowered I. dichotoma plants (Chimphamba, 1973; Ruan et al., 2017), whereas I. dichotoma with yellow flowers has not been comprehensively investigated. The F2 generation of I. dichotoma (violet-flowered) and I. domestica shows great variation in flower colours, but not with yellow (Lenz, 1972). Therefore, creating new germplasm with yellow-flowered I. dichotoma is a significant goal of Iris-breeding programs.

Pollen fertility is very important for plant development and reproduction (Consolaro et al., 1996; Conterato et al., 2006). Variations in pollen fertility are usually attributed to abnormal chromosome pairing and abnormal meiotic division (Yabuya, 1991). Abnormal meiosis, such as early chromosome migration, lagging chromosomes, bridge, unequal separation, micronuclei, multiple spindles, nonsynchronous division, unequal separation and so on, was observed in many plants, especially in interspecific hybrids (Wang et al., 2010; Hu et al., 2021). Compared with their parents, interspecific hybrids of Dendranthema had a higher frequency of chromosome bridges and lagging chromosomes (Cui et al., 2007). Approximately 56.5% of the cells of allotriploid lily ‘Cocossa’ demonstrated meiotic abnormalities at telophase II (Zhang et al., 2017). Sometimes, the high frequency of abnormal meiosis was also found in intraspecific hybrids. The hybrids of Hydrangea aspera subsp. aspera Kawakami group × subsp. sargentiana showed a higher frequency of meiotic abnormalities (48.2%) compared with the two parents and resulted in reduced pollen fertility (Crespel and Morel, 2014). Generally, the fertility of interspecific/intraspecific hybrid could be restored by successive backcrosses. So far, there is no information on pollen viability and meiosis of I. dichotoma, I. domestica and their hybrids. Therefore, meiotic behaviour and pollen fertility of yellow-flowered I. dichotoma, I. domestica and their F1, F2 and BC1 hybrid progenies were investigated in this study. Furthermore, the relationships between meiotic abnormalities and crossbreeding were discussed. The knowledge acquired will contribute to the rational use of these genetic resources.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant materials

Yellow-flowered I. dichotoma (Y2) was collected from Pinglu, Shanxi Province, and I. domestica (S3) was obtained from the Shenyang Botanical Garden, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China, in 2007. Both of them flower from July to late August, and their flowering periods overlap extensively. The populations of F1(Y2 × S3), F2[(Y2 × S3)⊗], BC1-Y[(Y2 × S3) × Y2] and BC1-S[(Y2 × S3) × S3] were established from 2009 to 2014, and 242, 126, 130 and 121 individuals were obtained, respectively. According to their fertility, we selected some of them for this study (Figure 1). Meiosis behaviour and pollen viability were studied in two parents, one F1 hybrid (F1-5), three F2 hybrids (F2-1, F2-2 and F2-3), four BC1-S hybrids (BC1-S-1, BC1-S-2, BC1-S-3 and BC1-S-4) and two BC1-Y hybrids (BC1-Y-1 and BC1-Y-2).

Figure 1

The flower of I. dichotoma (Y2), I. domestica (S3) and their hybrid progenies: A – I. dichotoma (Y2); B – I. domestica (S3); C – F1-5; D – F2-1; E – F2-2; F – F2-3; G – BC1-S-1; H – BC1-S-2; I – BC1-S-3; J–BC1-S-4; K – BC1-Y-1; l – BC1-Y-2.

Analysis of male meiosis

For analyses of meiosis, 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm and 10 mm length of young flower buds were collected between 8:00 am and 10:00 am in the middle of July 2015 and 2016 (field temperature about 29–31°C), fixed in a mixture of absolute alcohol and glacial acetic acid (3:1) for 24 h and then stored in 70% alcohol at 4°C. The anthers were squashed in 5% carbol fuchsin and examined under a microscope (Motic BA400, China).

Pollen viability and size observation

Flowers were collected at anther dehiscence and the pollens were dispersed in the laboratory for 3 h (relative humidity <30%; temperature 24°C). The pollens were cultured on a solid medium (150 g ⋅ L−1 sucrose + 100 mg ⋅ L−1 H3BO3 + 100 mg ⋅ L−1 CaCl2 + 3 g ⋅ L−1 agar, pH 5.8) at 25°C in an incubator (RLD-350D-4, China) for 2 h. At least 200 pollen grains per individual were observed under a microscope (Motic BA400, China). A pollen grain was considered to have germinated if the length of the pollen tube was equal to or longer than the pollen diameter.

Pollen size and morphological observation

Pollen grains were directly attached to double-sided adhesive tape and coated with gold. For pollen diameter, at least 1,000 pollen grains were measured for each accession. Microscopic observation and image acquisition were conducted using a scanning electron microscope at a magnification of 500× (TM3030, Japan).

RESULTS
Abnormal meiotic chromosome behaviours

During nor mal microsporogenesis, simultaneous meiosis was observed in I. dichotoma, I. domestica and their hybrid progenies: cytokinesis started only after telophase II (after the division of the four nuclei) and resulted in four microspores (tetrad), each containing one nucleus. Figure 2A2T shows photomicrographs of successive meiotic stages, from interphase I to the pollen stage. One of the striking observations of the interphase I stage in this study was the diffuse appearance of diplotene (Figure 2E, 2F). The diffuse stage in diplotene was observed in I. dichotoma, I. domestica and all of their hybrids. At the beginning of the diplotene, nuclei were filled with extended and fuzzy single chromosome threads, corresponding to the diffuse stage described in many plants, and they stained only faintly or not wholly. Following the diffuse stage, the chromosomes contracted markedly (Figure 2G).

Figure 2

Normal meiosis process of pollen mother cells in I. dichotoma (Y2), I. domestica (S3) and their hybrid progenies: A – pollen mother cell (BC1-S-2); B – leptotene (BC1-S-2); C – zygotene (BC1-S-2); D – pachytene (BC1-S-4); E – the diffuse appearance of diplotene (F1-5); F – late diplotene (BC1-Y-1); G – late diplotene (F2-3); H – diakinesis (BC1-S-4); I – metaphase I (BC1-S-2); J – anaphase I (BC1-S-4); K – telophase I (BC1-S-2); L – prophase II (BC1-S-2); M – metaphase II (BC1-Y-2); N – anaphase II (F1-5); O – telophase II (BC1-S-4); P – telophase II (BC1-S-2); Q, R – tetrad (BC1-S-4); S – tetrad spores (BC1-S-4); T – pollen (Y2).

In each stage of meiosis, several frequent meiotic abnormalities were recorded. Across all cells analysed, the abnormal meiosis rates in most hybrid progenies were much higher than that of their parents. Over 50.0% of the cells exhibited abnormalities in F2-1 (57.3%), BC1-S-1 (58.7%), BC1-S-2 (54.5%) and BC1-S-3 (52.7%), in contrast to 26.2% in I. dichotoma, 22.0% in I. domestica, 39.5% in F1-5, 41.4% in F2-2, 34.2% in F2-3, 47.7% in BC1-S-4, 25.8% in BC1-Y-1 and 23.3% in BC1-Y-2 (Table 1).

The meiosis abnormalities rate (%) in I. dichotoma, I. domestica and their hybrid progenies.

Phase abnormalities Plant materials
Y2 S3 F1-5 F2-1 F2-2 F2-3 BC1-S-1 BC1-S-2 BC1-S-3 BC1-S-4 BC1-Y-1 BC1-Y-2
Metaphase I 288 241 200 130 184 210 162 207 165 80 142 150
Non-congression 114 (39.6%) 94 (39.0%) 83 (41.5%) 57 (43.8%) 80 (43.5%) 85 (40.5%) 98 (60.5%) 126 (60.9%) 78 (42.3%) 30 (37.5%) 40 (28.2%) 27 (18.0%)
Anaphase I 216 170 156 104 155 140 113 120 150 126 115 143
Lagging chromosomes 82 (37.9%) 35 (20.6%) 53 (34.0%) 11 (10.6%) 42 (27.1%) 31 (22.1%) 46 (40.7%) 50 (41.7%) 60 (40.0%) 41 (32.5%) 24 (20.9%) 14 (9.8%)
Bridge 19 (8.7%) 0 (0.0%) 28 (17.9%) 12 (11.5%) 5 (3.2%) 18 (12.9%) 3 (2.7%) 6 (5.0%) 11 (7.3%) 15 (11.9%) 5 (4.3%) 10 (7.0%)
Telophase I 195 152 152 123 121 127 107 102 109 88 120 167
Unequal separation 22 (11.3%) 8 (5.3%) 35 (23.0%) 64 (52.0%) 13 (10.7%) 9 (7.1%) 47 (43.9%) 24 (23.5%) 0 (0.0%) 25 (28.4%) 27 (22.5%) 45 (26.9%)
Micronuclei 7 (3.6%) 0 (0.0%) 3 (2.0%) 0 (0.0) 9 (7.4%) 12 (9.4%) 10 (9.3%) 4 (3.9%) 19 (17.4%) 5 (5.7%) 3 (2.5%) 0 (0.0%)
Metaphase II 160 160 154 230 131 140 101 142 164 142 150 150
Non-congression 1 (0.6%) 14 (8.8%) 24 (15.6%) 67 (29.1%) 28 (21.4%) 19 (13.6%) 26 (25.7%) 24 (16.9%) 30 (18.3%) 22 (15.5%) 10 (6.7%) 5 (3.33%)
Abnormal spindle 3 (1.9) 2 (1.3%) 41 (26.6%) 76 (33.0%) 6 (4.6%) 17 (12.1%) 14 (13.9%) 54 (38.0%) 61 (37.2%) 44 (31.0%) 25 (16.7%) 34 (22.7%)
Anaphase II 220 188 202 221 194 200 214 281 310 235 250 269
Lagging chromosomes 31 (14.1%) 26 (13.8%) 12 (5.9%) 42 (19.0%) 51 (26.3%) 26 (13.0%) 14 (6.5%) 51 (18.1%) 43 (13.9%) 54 (23.0%) 22 (8.8%) 46 (17.1%)
Bridge 6 (2.7%) 0 (0.0%) 14 (6.9%) 8 (3.6%) 11 (5.7%) 10 (5.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 17 (5.5%) 6 (2.6%) 0 (0.0%) 3 (1.1%)
Abnormal spindle 5 (2.3%) 6 (3.2%) 17 (8.4%) 46 (20.8%) 27 (13.9%) 11 (5.5%) 64 (29.9%) 30 (10.7%) 71 (22.9%) 16 (6.8%) 6 (2.4%) 2 (0.7%)
Not synchronous division 14 (6.4%) 11 (5.9%) 33 (16.3%) 74 (33.5%) 39 (20.1%) 23 (11.5%) 70 (32.7%) 90 (32.0%) 65 (21.0%) 75 (31.9%) 29 (11.6%) 14 (5.2%)
Telophase II 223 172 200 150 125 183 151 138 152 295 166 121
Unequal separation 43 (19.3%) 42 (24.4%) 76 (38.0) 91 (60.7%) 62 (49.6%) 67 (36.6%) 82 (54.3%) 72 (56.5%) 96 (63.2%) 98 (33.2%) 33 (19.9%) 21 (17.4%)
Micronuclei 8 (3.6%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (4.5%) 1 (0.7%) 4 (3.2%) 12 (6.6%) 24 (15.9%) 6 (4.3%) 2 (1.3%) 30 (10.2%) 19 (11.4%) 12 (9.9%)
Total 1,302 1,083 1,064 958 910 1,000 848 990 1,050 966 943 1,000
Abnormalities rate 26.2% 22.0% 39.5% 57.3% 41.4% 34.2% 58.7% 54.5% 52.7% 47.7% 25.8% 23.3%

During the first meiotic division, the presence of non-congressed chromosomes that did not align on the equatorial plate was observed at metaphase I in all 12 accessions (Figure 3A, 3B). The consequent behaviour of these univalents depended on the genotype and resulted in retarded movement to the poles and the formation of micronuclei. At anaphase I, lagging chromosomes were found in all 12 accessions. In BC1-Y-1 and BC1-Y-2, the univalents joined the large chromosome sets at the poles, although they were retarded in their movement (Figure 3C). In contrast, lagging chromosomes formed new micronuclei in BC1-S-3. In this phase, chromosomal single and double bridges were found (Figure 3D, 3E). In BC1-S-1, chromosome stickiness resulted in thick chromosomal bridges, restricting chromosome separation (Figure 3F). Chromosome bridges were completely absent in I. domestica and appeared only rarely in F2-2 and BC1-Y-1. At telophase I, micronuclei derived from lagging chromosomes and/or acentric fragments were found (Figure 3H). F2-1 and BC1-S-1 showed relatively high numbers (52.0% and 43.9%, respectively) of cells with unequal chromosome segregation (Figure 3G).

Figure 3

Abnormal meiosis phenomena in pollen mother cells of F1, F2 and BC1 plants from the cross I. dichotoma (Y2) × I. domestica (S3): A, B – non-congression in metaphase I of F2-2 and F1-5, respectively; C – laggard chromosomes in anaphase I of BC1-Y-1; D – bridge in anaphase I of BC1-S-2; E – double bridges in anaphase I of F2-3; F – thick bridge in anaphase I of BC1-S-1; G – unequal separation in telophase I of F2-1; H – micronuclei in telophase I of BC1-S-2; I – non-congression in metaphase II of BC1-S-3; J – early separation in metaphase II of BC1-S-1; K – tripolar spindle fibres in metaphase II of F2-1; L – perpendicular spindle fibres in metaphase II of BC1-S-1; M – laggard chromosomes in anaphase II of BC1-S-2; N – bridge in anaphase II of F2-3; O – tripolar spindle fibres in anaphase II of F2-1; P, Q – perpendicular spindle fibres in anaphase II of F1-5 and BC1-S-2, respectively; R – multiple spindle fibres of BC1-S-3; S, T – not synchronous division in anaphase II of F1-5 and F2-3, respectively; U, V – unequal separation in telophase II of BC1-S-4; W – unequal separation in telophase II of BC1-S-4; X – unequal separation in telophase II of BC1-S-2; Y – two micronuclei in telophase II of BC1-S-2.

During the second meiotic division, abnormalities related to the non-congressing chromosomes were observed in I. dichotoma, BC1-Y-1 and BC1-Y-2 with a low frequency at metaphase II. In other genotypes, this percentage varied between 8.5% and 29.1% (Figure 3I, 3J). Apart from normal spindles that had a linear alignment, abnormal spindles in meiosis II were also found. When abnormal organisation occurred, the most common conformations were a tripolar spindle (Figure 3K), followed by the perpendicular formation of the convergent zone (Figure 3L). At anaphase II, lagging chromosomes (Figure 3M), chromosome bridges (Figure 3N) and tripolar and perpendicular spindles were observed again (Figure 3O3Q). Another spindle abnormality was the occurrence of multiple spindles in BC1-S-3 (Figure 3R). In F1-5 and F2-3, chromosome separation was asynchronous at anaphase II (Figure 3S, 3T). Chromosome disequilibrium segregation was also found at anaphase II and telophaseII (Figure 3U, 3V). New micronuclei formed at telophase II, which resulted in the formation of polyads (Figure 3Y).

At the tetrad formation, the second meiotic division mostly ran perpendicular to the first, causing the four microspores to be orientated as shown in Figure 4G. Rarely, the resulting four microspores were arranged in a row during this stage. One of the striking observations of the tetrad stage in this study was the sporad configurations in hybrids (Table 2 and Figure 4) including monads, dyads, triads, tetrads and polyads, reflecting low pollen fertility. Monads were mainly observed in F2-1, but not viable (Figure 4A). Dyads and triads were found in most of the individuals at the end of microsporogenesis, indicating the production of unreduced gametes. Triads (composing of one 2n microspore and two n microspores) might result from the formation of disoriented (tripolar) spindles. However, the size of microspores in BC1-S-2 and BC1-S-3 was very variable and several pentads, hexads or abnormal tetrads (containing three large and one small microspores) were observed (Figure 4I4O).

Distribution (%) of sporad configurations in I. dichotoma, I. domestica and their hybrid progenies.

Materials No. of cells studied Monad Rate (%) Dyad Rate (%) Triad Rate (%) Tetrad Rate (%) Polyad Rate (%)
Y2 245 1.9 4.3 10.6 83.1 0.0
S3 213 0.0 3.8 13.6 78.4 4.2
F1-5 253 0.4 5.1 5.5 50.2 38.7
F2-1 208 10.1 36.5 16.4 35.1 1.9
F2-2 201 6.0 0.0 16.0 72.1 6.0
F2-3 260 0.0 7.7 30.8 57.7 3.9
BC1-S-1 432 2.3 14.6 33.8 45.4 3.9
BC1-S-2 254 1.2 7.1 29.1 51.2 11.4
BC1-S-3 271 5.5 11.1 33.2 46.1 4.1
BC1-S-4 373 0.0 4.6 37.0 53.1 5.4
BC1-Y-1 363 1.7 10.5 34.2 47.9 5.8
BC1-Y-2 319 1.3 15.7 34.5 44.5 4.1

Figure 4

The meiosis sporad in I. dichotoma (Y2), I. domestica (S3) and their hybrid progenies: A – monad of F2-1; B – dyad of BC1-S-3; C – dyad of F2-2; D – triad of BC1-Y-1; E – triad of BC1-S-3; F – triad of F2-3; G – tetrad of F1-5; H – tetrad of BC1-S-2; I – tetrad of BC1-S-1; J – pentad of BC1-S-2; K – pentad of BC1-S-4; L – polyad of F2-3; M – polyad of BC1-S-3; N – polyad of BC1-S-1; O – polyad of BC1-S-2.

Pollen viability and size variation

The analyses of pollen viability and size in I. dichotoma, I. domestica and their hybrids are shown in Table 3. F2-1 and BC1-S-1 were male-sterile and did not have any pollen. The average pollen fertility of F1-5 (10.1%) was much lower than that of its parents, whereas F2-2 produced few pollen grains, and they rarely germinated. Pollen abortion rates of I. dichotoma and I. domestica (1.9% and 14.5%, respectively) were lower than that of the interspecific hybrids except for BC1-S-4 (13.3%). The mean pollen fertility of BC1-S-2 (1.6%) was the lowest besides F2-1 and BC1-S-1 without pollen. The pollen germination rates of F1-5 (10.1%), F2-2 (2.4%) and F2-3 (21.5%) were lower than that of I. dichotoma (26.1%) and I. domestica (35.1%). In BC1-S-2 (1.6%) and BC1-S-3 (4.8%), almost no pollen grains germinated. BC1-S-4 pollen appeared normal but germinated poorly with only 7.2% of pollen germination. However, BC1-Y-1 and BC1-Y-2 demonstrated higher pollen germination rates than others except for I. domestica (Figure 5).

Pollen germination rates of I. dichotoma (Y2), I. domestica (S3) and their hybrid progenies.

Materials Pollen in plant Normal pollen size (μm) Large pollen (%) No. of pollens observed No. of pollens germinated No. of abort pollens Abortion rate (%) Germination rate (%)
Y2 More 65–75 0.5 1,713 447 33 1.9 26.1
S3 More 60–70 0.2 2,706 951 392 14.5 35.1
F1-5 More 60–70 0.8 2,039 205 738 36.2 10.1
F2-1 None
F2-2 Little 63–73 0.7 1,354 32 628 46.4 2.4
F2-3 More 60–70 1.1 1,014 218 323 31.9 21.5
BC1-S-1 None
BC1-S-2 Little 61–71 1.7 582 9 311 53.4 1.6
BC1-S-3 Little 62–72 1.7 673 32 334 49.6 4.8
BC1-S-4 More 58–68 1.9 1,049 76 139 13.3 7.2
BC1-Y-1 More 65–75 2.0 1,899 526 696 36.7 27.7
BC1-Y-2 More 63–73 2.3 1,916 597 631 32.9 31.2

Large pollen grains: >1.3× diameter of normal-sized pollen.

Figure 5

Pollen germination of I. dichotoma (Y2), I. domestica (S3) and their hybrid progenies: A – I. dichotoma (Y2); B – I. domestica (S3); C – F1-5; D – F2-2; E – F2-3; F – BC1-S-2; G – BC1-S-3; H – BC1-S-4; I – BC1-Y-1; J – BC1-Y-2.

The normal-sized pollen grain diameters of I. dichotoma, I. domestica, F1-5, F2-2, F2-3, BC1-S-2, BC1-S-3, BC1-S-4, BC1-Y-1 and BC1-Y-2 were 65–75 μm, 60–70 μm, 60–70 μm, 63–73 μm, 60–70 μm, 58–68 μm, 61–71 μm, 62–72 μm, 65–75 mm and 63–73 μm, respectively. In addition to single pollen grains, including regular smaller ellipsoidal and larger spherical pollen grains, a few adherent pollen grains were viable. Furthermore, some large pollen grains (>1.3 times the diameter of normal-sized pollen grain) were observed in I. dichotoma (0.5%), I. domestica (0.2%), F1-5 (0.8%), F2-2 (0.7%), F2-3 (1.1%), BC1-S-2 (1.9%), BC1-S-3 (1.7%), BC1-S-4 (1.7%), BC1-Y-1 (2.0%) and BC1-Y-2 (2.3%). As large grains are an indication of 2n pollen production, 2n gametes might be present in these plants (Figure 6C6F), which have potential for polyploid breeding, especially in BC1-Y-2, BC1-Y-1, BC1-S-2, BC1-S-3 and BC1-S-4. Although meiotic aberrations in these large pollen producers resulted mainly in triads, monads, dyads and polyads were also observed.

Figure 6

Scanning electron micrographs of different pollen grains: A – Y2; B – S3; C – F1-5; D – F2-3; E – BC1-S-3; F – BC1-S-4. C–F – occurrence of large pollen grains. Scale bar = 50 μm (magnification 500×).

DISCUSSION

The most striking form of the diffuse stage that we observed in these hybrids was the diffuse diplotene stage. To our knowledge, this phenomenon was found in the Iris species for the first time. The same phenomenon has also been reported in Rosa and large genome cereals (Colas et al., 2017) as well as in Larix (Kołowerzo-Lubnau et al., 2015). Especially in interspecific hybrid plants, the diffuse stage has been proposed to be widespread in plant meiosis, affecting restitution from diffuse to fully contracted chromosomes, with chromosomes often entering metaphase before fully contracting (Klášterská and Natarajan, 1974). In this study, it occurred in summer with high temperatures and drought stress. In Larix species, meiosis calmed during the autumn and pollen mother cells remained in the diffuse stage for several months to resist the cold (Ekberg et al., 1968). This possibly reflects that the diffuse stage is influenced by some extraordinary environmental conditions.

The high frequency of meiosis abnormalities was observed in BC1-S-1 (58.7%), BC1-S-2 (54.5%), BC1-S-3 (52.7%), BC1-S-4(47.7%) and F2-1(57.3%), with low pollen-germination rates (0, 1.6%, 4.8%, 7.2% and 0, respectively). Pollen fertility analysis of different cross combinations in this study indicated that meiotic abnormalities, such as non-congression, lagging chromosomes, unequal separation and abnormal spindle fibres orientation, led to low pollen fertility. As previously reported, pollen viability is closely associated with meiosis of pollen mother cells, and meiotic abnormalities affect pollen development (Boff and Chifino-wittmann, 2002; Zha et al., 2007; Farco and Dematteis, 2014; Usandizaga et al., 2020). The relationship between meiotic abnormalities and fertility has been studied in many plant species, including Musa and Brassica (Adeleke et al., 2004; Yang et al., 2020). Meiotic abnormalities are shown to be negatively correlated with pollen fertility (Devi and Borua, 1997).

The pollen fertility of F1-5 (10.1%) was much lower than that of its parents I. dichotoma (26.1%) and I. domestica (35.1%). Backcrossing F1-5 to I. dichotoma resulted in rapid restoration of fertility, and the pollen fertility of BC1-Y-1 and BC1-Y-2 was higher than that of F1-5. However, when backcrossing F1-5 to I. domestica, the BC1 hybrids had a high total meiosis abnormality rate (exceeding 50.0%) and produced no or shrunken pollen with relatively low pollen fertility (0 to 4.8%) compared with F1-5 (10.1%). Low fertility of BCl plants was also reported in Agropyron junceum (Charpentier et al., 1986) although backcrossing can restore the fertility of interspecific hybrids (Yushkina et al., 2009). F1-5 was male fertile and presented only 1–4 unpaired chromosomes. Partial fertility of the interspecific hybrid could be associated with relatively high chromosome association frequency, indicating partial genomic homology between the parental species (Asano, 1984). The abnormal segregation of chromosomes in meiosis I and II can lead to the formation of micronuclei, which either may remain in microspore tetrads or may be eliminated in the form of microcytes for additional cytokinesis. In this case, the formed tetrads will be genetically unbalanced, and the resulting pollen will become dysfunctional or shrunken. Although tetrads were found in F2-1 and BC1-Y-1, they did not grow cell walls and form pollen grains. Therefore, the frequency of 2n pollen was low in I. dichotoma, I. domestica and their hybrids which exhibited a high frequency of dyad and triad. Additionally, microspores in tetrads could originate from an unequal chromosome division, usually leading to sterile pollen (Do Nascimento et al., 2014).

In this study, the lagging chromosomes, unequal separation and nonsynchronous division led to chromosomes slowly moving to cell poles, forming the micronucleus or disappearing in the cytoplasm, and finally led to the production of unbalanced tetrads or polyad and abnormal pollen grains. Similar meiotic aberrations have been reported in Brachiaria (Gallo et al., 2007), Begonia (Dewitte et al., 2010), Hydrangea aspera (Crespel and Morel, 2014) and allotriploid lily ‘Cocossa’ (Zhang et al., 2017). They can be contributed to chromosome pairing problems due to their lack of homology and are the expression of the typical behaviour of univalent or non-paired chromosomes. In some rare cases, unequal and incomplete nuclei separation resulted in monads, such as asymmetric cytokinesis in pollen mother cells in which the entire nucleus was included in one of the cells (Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2005). In this study, the presence of dyads and/or triads at the tetrad stage imply the production of 2n pollen grains. Abnormal spindle fibres orientation is associated with the production of 2n gametes. The formation of disoriented spindle fibres led to a dyad (composed of two 2n microspores) in the case of fused or parallel spindle fibres, and to a triad (composed of one 2n microspore and two n microspores) in the case of tripolar spindle fibres. The production of 2n gametes was observed in interspecific hybrids of potato (Conicella, 1991), Populus (Dong et al., 2015) and strawberry (Luo et al., 2018).

The spontaneous occurrence of unreduced gametes can produce unexpected polyploids such as triploids and tetraploids in both natural and artificial crosses in various plants such as Lilium (Van Tuyl et al., 2005), Tulip (Marasek-Ciolakowska, 2012) and Primula (Kato et al., 2008). When they occur in interspecific hybrids with some extent of viability, 2n gametes can be used to produce sexual progeny through either crossing or selfing (Ramanna and Jacobsen, 2003; Van Tuyl and Lim, 2003). In the case of meiotic polyploidisation, polyploid progenies are raised by crossing with 2n gamete-producing genotypes. The most important advantage of meiotic polyploidisation is that homologous recombination occurs at a high frequency between parental chromosomes during meiosis. Therefore, a large amount of heterozygosity can be transmitted to the polyploid offspring. Because of the function of unreduced gametes, a considerable number of Iris garden varieties with large flowers, improved form and plant habit, and fully fertile were produced through intercrossing by meiotic polyploidisation (Bee et al., 1986). In this study, the selection of individuals producing 2n gametes allowed manipulating the ploidy level of the offspring. Because unreduced pollen is not always viable, as previously demonstrated in Begonia (Dewitte et al., 2010), screening for viable unreduced gametes should be undertaken in the future, as these cells present an interesting tool for polyploidisation and can be used as pollen donors to produce polyploid iris individuals exhibiting larger flowers as well as higher pollen and seed fertility (Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2004; Nikoloudakis et al., 2018).

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, this study analysed the relationship between meiotic abnormalities and pollen fertility in 12 Iris individuals comprising parents and hybrids resulting from their crosses and backcrosses. Meiotic abnormalities negatively affected pollen fertility. The diffuse diplotene stage was observed for the first time in the genus Iris. Poor pollen fertility of BC1-S presented difficulties for further breeding. As all BC1-Y individuals displayed relatively similar flower colour (yellow) and higher pollen fertility than other cross combinations, they are excellent plant material for yellow-flowered iris breeding. In addition, BC1-Y-2, BC1-Y-1, BC1-S-2, BC1-S-3 and BC1-S-4 have potential in polyploid breeding.

eISSN:
2083-5965
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Biologie, Botanik, Zoologie, Ökologie, andere