This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abu-Elrob, R., & Tawalbeh, A. (2022). The pivotal role of small talk in distance teaching during covid 19 curfew period. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 14(1), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.14.1.9Abu-ElrobR.TawalbehA.2022The pivotal role of small talk in distance teaching during covid 19 curfew periodJordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures141165188https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.14.1.9Search in Google Scholar
Bambaeeroo, F., & Shokrpour, N. (2017). The impact of the teachers’ non-verbal communication on success in teaching. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 5(2), 51–59. NODOIBambaeerooF.ShokrpourN.2017The impact of the teachers’ non-verbal communication on success in teachingJournal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism525159NODOISearch in Google Scholar
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.BergmannJ.SamsA.2012Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every dayInternational Society for Technology in EducationSearch in Google Scholar
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Buntins, K., Kerres, M., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2020). Facilitating student engagement in higher education through educational technology: A narrative systematic review in the field of education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(2), 315–368.BondM.BedenlierS.BuntinsK.KerresM.Zawacki-RichterO.2020Facilitating student engagement in higher education through educational technology: A narrative systematic review in the field of educationContemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education202315368Search in Google Scholar
Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006BowerM.DalgarnoB.KennedyG. E.LeeM. J. W.KenneyJ.2015Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysisComputers & Education86117https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006Search in Google Scholar
Burgsteiner, H., & Krammer, G. (Eds.). (2022). Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic’s distance learning on students and teachers in schools and in higher education – International perspectives. Leykam Buchverlag. https://doi.org/10.56560/isbn.978-3-7011-0496-3BurgsteinerH.KrammerG.(Eds.).2022Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic’s distance learning on students and teachers in schools and in higher education – International perspectivesLeykam Buchverlaghttps://doi.org/10.56560/isbn.978-3-7011-0496-3Search in Google Scholar
Cahapay, M. B. (2020). A reconceptualization of learning space as schools reopen amid and after COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 269–276.CahapayM. B.2020A reconceptualization of learning space as schools reopen amid and after COVID-19 pandemicAsian Journal of Distance Education151269276Search in Google Scholar
Conklina, S., Oyarzun, B., & Barreto, D. (2017). Blended synchronous learning environment: Student perspectives. Research on Education and Media, 9(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/rem-2017-0004ConklinaS.OyarzunB.BarretoD.2017Blended synchronous learning environment: Student perspectivesResearch on Education and Media911723https://doi.org/10.1515/rem-2017-0004Search in Google Scholar
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111FreemanS.EddyS. L.McDonoughM.SmithM. K.OkoroaforN.JordtH.WenderothM. P.2014Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematicsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1112384108415https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111Search in Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206GlaserB. G.StraussA. L.2017The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative researchRoutledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206Search in Google Scholar
Gnaur, D., Hindhede, A. L., & Harms Andersen, V. (2020). Towards hybrid learning in higher education in the wake of the COVID-19 crisis. European conference on e-learning. https://www.proquest.com/openview/028255fde9ef6a013f90bd0c5a7ee240/1?cbl=1796419&pq-origsite=gscholar&parentSessionId=zxQJIxiql4V3tBOl0jmgwCIIP1sj0L6%2Fl2zNUyTTL%2F0%3DGnaurD.HindhedeA. L.Harms AndersenV.2020Towards hybrid learning in higher education in the wake of the COVID-19 crisisEuropean conference on e-learninghttps://www.proquest.com/openview/028255fde9ef6a013f90bd0c5a7ee240/1?cbl=1796419&pq-origsite=gscholar&parentSessionId=zxQJIxiql4V3tBOl0jmgwCIIP1sj0L6%2Fl2zNUyTTL%2F0%3DSearch in Google Scholar
Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), n1.GrayJ. A.DiLoretoM.2016The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environmentsInternational Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation111n1Search in Google Scholar
Howe, C. (2023). Classroom interaction and student learning: Reasoned dialogue versus reasoned opposition. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 11(3), A26–A41. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2023.549HoweC.2023Classroom interaction and student learning: Reasoned dialogue versus reasoned oppositionDialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal113A26A41https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2023.549Search in Google Scholar
Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Riecke, B. E., & Hatala, M. (2015). Social presence in online discussions as a process predictor of academic performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 638–654.JoksimovićS.GaševićD.KovanovićV.RieckeB. E.HatalaM.2015Social presence in online discussions as a process predictor of academic performanceJournal of Computer Assisted Learning316638654Search in Google Scholar
Kara, M. (2021). Transactional distance and learner outcomes in an online EFL context. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 36(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1717454KaraM.2021Transactional distance and learner outcomes in an online EFL contextOpen Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning3614560https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1717454Search in Google Scholar
Kassandrinou, A., Angelaki, C., & Mavroidis, I. (2014). Transactional distance among Open University students: How does it affect the learning process? European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 17(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2014-0002KassandrinouA.AngelakiC.MavroidisI.2014Transactional distance among Open University students: How does it affect the learning process?European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning1712642https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2014-0002Search in Google Scholar
Kim, K., Sharma, P., Land, S. M., & Furlong, K. P. (2013). Effects of active learning on enhancing student critical thinking in an undergraduate general science course. Innovative Higher Education, 38(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-012-9236-xKimK.SharmaP.LandS. M.FurlongK. P.2013Effects of active learning on enhancing student critical thinking in an undergraduate general science courseInnovative Higher Education383223235https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-012-9236-xSearch in Google Scholar
Lakhal, S., Mukamurera, J., Bédard, M.-E., Heilporn, G., & Chauret, M. (2021). Students and instructors perspective on blended synchronous learning in a Canadian graduate program. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1383–1396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12578LakhalS.MukamureraJ.BédardM.-E.HeilpornG.ChauretM.2021Students and instructors perspective on blended synchronous learning in a Canadian graduate programJournal of Computer Assisted Learning37513831396https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12578Search in Google Scholar
Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2018). Investigating students’ perceptions of instructional strategies to establish social presence. Distance Education, 39(3), 281–298.LowenthalP. R.DunlapJ. C.2018Investigating students’ perceptions of instructional strategies to establish social presenceDistance Education393281298Search in Google Scholar
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online learning, 22(1), 205–222.MartinF.BolligerD. U.2018Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environmentOnline learning221205222Search in Google Scholar
Martin, F., Budhrani, K., Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Roles and competencies. Online Learning, 23(1), 184–205.MartinF.BudhraniK.KumarS.RitzhauptA.2019Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Roles and competenciesOnline Learning231184205Search in Google Scholar
Mbwesa, J. K. (2014). Transactional distance as a predictor of perceived learner satisfaction in distance learning courses: A case study of Bachelor of Education arts program, University of Nairobi, Kenya. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(2), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v2i2.291MbwesaJ. K.2014Transactional distance as a predictor of perceived learner satisfaction in distance learning courses: A case study of Bachelor of Education arts program, University of Nairobi, KenyaJournal of Education and Training Studies22176188https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v2i2.291Search in Google Scholar
Moore, M. G. (1973). Toward a theory of independent learning and teaching. The Journal of Higher Education, 44(9), 661–679.MooreM. G.1973Toward a theory of independent learning and teachingThe Journal of Higher Education449661679Search in Google Scholar
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659MooreM. G.1989Editorial: Three types of interactionAmerican Journal of Distance Education3217https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659Search in Google Scholar
Moore, M. G. (2018). The theory of transactional distance. In M. G. Moore & W. C. Diehl (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (4th ed., pp. 32–46). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315296135-4MooreM. G.2018The theory of transactional distanceInMooreM. G.DiehlW. C.(Eds.),Handbook of distance education4th ed.3246Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781315296135-4Search in Google Scholar
Moreno, M. M. L., Rodrigo, M. M. T., Torres, J. M. R., Gaspar, T. J., & Agapito, J. L. (2021). Transactional Distances During Emergency Remote Teaching Experiences.MorenoM. M. L.RodrigoM. M. T.TorresJ. M. R.GasparT. J.AgapitoJ. L.2021Transactional Distances During Emergency Remote Teaching ExperiencesSearch in Google Scholar
Murray, A., Roy, S., Hahn, M., & Voglewede, P. (2021). Did the student-instructor and peer-to-peer divide widen with instructional changes during COVID-19? EdArXiv. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/fkw32MurrayA.RoyS.HahnM.VoglewedeP.2021Did the student-instructor and peer-to-peer divide widen with instructional changes during COVID-19?EdArXiv. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/fkw32Search in Google Scholar
Nussli, N., & Oh, K. (2024). Creating a “Space In-Between”: Learning on the physical–hybrid–virtual continuum. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(4), 471–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395241252139NussliN.OhK.2024Creating a “Space In-Between”: Learning on the physical–hybrid–virtual continuumJournal of Educational Technology Systems524471506https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395241252139Search in Google Scholar
Paul, R. C., Swart, W., Zhang, A. M., & MacLeod, K. R. (2015). Revisiting Zhang’s scale of transactional distance: Refinement and validation using structural equation modeling. Distance Education, 36(3), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1081741PaulR. C.SwartW.ZhangA. M.MacLeodK. R.2015Revisiting Zhang’s scale of transactional distance: Refinement and validation using structural equation modelingDistance Education363364382https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1081741Search in Google Scholar
Pettit, J. M., & Grace, D. J. (1970). The Stanford instructional television network. IEEE Spectrum, 7(5), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.1970.5213376PettitJ. M.GraceD. J.1970The Stanford instructional television networkIEEE Spectrum757380https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.1970.5213376Search in Google Scholar
Pittman, V. (1991). Rivalry for respectability: Collegiate and proprietary correspondence programs. 183–184.PittmanV.1991Rivalry for respectability: Collegiate and proprietary correspondence programs183184Search in Google Scholar
Raes, A. (2022). Exploring student and teacher experiences in hybrid learning environments: Does presence matter? Postdigital Science and Education, 4(1), 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00274-0RaesA.2022Exploring student and teacher experiences in hybrid learning environments: Does presence matter?Postdigital Science and Education41138159https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00274-0Search in Google Scholar
Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2020). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-zRaesA.DetienneL.WindeyI.DepaepeF.2020A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identifiedLearning Environments Research233269290https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-zSearch in Google Scholar
Roberts, P., Scott, S. V., Cranney, J., Cumming, T. M., Angstmann, E., Nehme, M., & Watson, K. (2024). Design principles for dual mode readiness in an uncertain future. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2022.2147094RobertsP.ScottS. V.CranneyJ.CummingT. M.AngstmannE.NehmeM.WatsonK.2024Design principles for dual mode readiness in an uncertain futureInnovations in Education and Teaching International612240250https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2022.2147094Search in Google Scholar
Rocca, K. A. (2010). Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature Review. Communication Education, 59(2), 185–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903505936RoccaK. A.2010Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature ReviewCommunication Education592185213https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903505936Search in Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010SacksH.SchegloffE. A.JeffersonG.1974A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversationLanguage504696735https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010Search in Google Scholar
Şat, M., İLhan, F., & Yukselturk, E. (2022). Web tools as e-icebreakers in online education. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(3), 721–737. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1084512ŞatM.İLhanF.YukselturkE.2022Web tools as e-icebreakers in online educationJournal of Educational Technology and Online Learning53721737https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1084512Search in Google Scholar
Santo, S. A. (2011). Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education Michael Simonson, Sharon Smaldino, Michael Albright, and Susan Zvacek, Eds: 5th ed. Boston: Pearson Education, 2011, 383 pp. (softcover). American Journal of Distance Education, 25(3), 201–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2011.589757SantoS. A.2011Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education Michael Simonson, Sharon Smaldino, Michael Albright, and Susan Zvacek, Eds: 5th ed. Boston: Pearson Education, 2011, 383 pp. (softcover)American Journal of Distance Education253201204https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2011.589757Search in Google Scholar
Szeto, E., & Cheng, A. Y. N. (2016). Towards a framework of interactions in a blended synchronous learning environment: What effects are there on students’ social presence experience? Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 487–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.881391SzetoE.ChengA. Y. N.2016Towards a framework of interactions in a blended synchronous learning environment: What effects are there on students’ social presence experience?Interactive Learning Environments243487503https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.881391Search in Google Scholar
Szeto, E. (2015). Community of Inquiry as an instructional approach: What effects of teaching, social and cognitive presences are there in blended synchronous learning and teaching? Computers & Education, 81, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.015SzetoE.2015Community of Inquiry as an instructional approach: What effects of teaching, social and cognitive presences are there in blended synchronous learning and teaching?Computers & Education81191201https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.015Search in Google Scholar
Thorne, S. (2000). Data analysis in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 3(3), 68–70. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebn.3.3.68ThorneS.2000Data analysis in qualitative researchEvidence-Based Nursing336870https://doi.org/10.1136/ebn.3.3.68Search in Google Scholar
Vasiloudis, G., Koutsouba, M., Giossos, Y., & Mavroidis, I. (2015). Transactional distance and autonomy in a distance learning environment. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 18(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2015-0008VasiloudisG.KoutsoubaM.GiossosY.MavroidisI.2015Transactional distance and autonomy in a distance learning environmentEuropean Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning181114https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2015-0008Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Quek, C. L., & Hu, X. (2017). Designing and improving a blended synchronous learning environment: An educational design research. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.3034WangQ.QuekC. L.HuX.2017Designing and improving a blended synchronous learning environment: An educational design researchThe International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning183https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.3034Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, A. (2003). Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory construction. Retrospective ETD Collection. https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd_retro/94ZhangA.2003Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory constructionRetrospective ETD Collectionhttps://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd_retro/94Search in Google Scholar