[Agbenyega, O., Burgess, P.J., Cook, M. & Morris J. (2009). Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands. Land Use Policy, 26, 551-557. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.08.011.10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.08.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Ayumi, Y. & Chanhda H. (2009). Ecosystem Service Values and Land Use Change in Trans-Boundary National Bio- diversity Conservation Areas (NBCA): A Case study of Phou Dean Din NBCA, Lao PDR. http://www.esee2009. si/ESEE2009.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Müller, F. & Windhorst W. (2009). Landscapes’ capacities to provide ecosystem services—a concept for land-cover based assessments. Landscape Online, 15, 1-22. DOI: 10.3097/LO.200915.10.3097/LO.200915]Search in Google Scholar
[Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S. & Müller F. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply demand and budgets.Ecological Indicators, 21, 17-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019]Search in Google Scholar
[Costanza, R., DArge, R., de Groot, R.S., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P. & van den Belt M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253-260.]Search in Google Scholar
[Daily, G.C., Söderqvist, T, Aniyar, S., Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Ehrlich, P.R., Folke, C., Jansson, A., Jansson, B., Kaut- sky N., Levin, S., Lubchenco, J., Mäler, K., Simpson, D., Starrett, D., Tilman, D. & Walker B. (2000). The value of nature and the nature of value. Science, 289, 395-396. DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5478.395.10.1126/science.289.5478.395]Search in Google Scholar
[de Groot, R.S., Wilson, M. & Boumans R. (2002). A typology for the description, classification, and valuation 352 of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 393-408. DOI: 10.1016/S0921- 8009(02)00089-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., López-Santiago, C.A., Aguilera, P.A. & Montes C. (2012). The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: An ecosystem service approach. Environmental Science & Policy, 19-20, 136-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.006.10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Hartter, J. (2010). Resource use and ecosystem services in a forest park landscape. Society and Natural Resources, 23, 207-223. DOI: 10.1080/08941920903360372.10.1080/08941920903360372]Search in Google Scholar
[HreŠko, J., Mederly P. & PetroviČ F. (2003). Landscape-ecological research with support of GIS tools in preparation of landscape-ecological plan (model area of the Považská Bystrica city). Ekológia (Bratislava), 22(Suppl. 2), 195-212.]Search in Google Scholar
[Iverson, L., Echeverria, C, Nahuelhual, L. & Luque S. (2014). Ecosystem services in changing landscapes: An intro- duction. Landsc. Ecol., 29(2), 181-186. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-014-9993-2.10.1007/s10980-014-9993-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelemen, E., Nguyen, G., Gomiero, T., Kovács, E., Choisis, J.P., Choisis, N., Paoletti, M.G., Podmaniczky L., Ry- schawy J., Sarthou, J.P., Herzog, F., Dennis, P. & Balázs K. (2013). Farmers’ perceptions of biodiversity: Lessons from a discourse-based deliberative valuation study Land Use Policy, 35, 318-328. DOI: 10.1016/j.landuse- pol.2013.06.005.]Search in Google Scholar
[Konarska, K.M., Sutton, PC. & Castellon M. (2002). Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation: a comparison of NOAA-AVHRR and Landsat TM datasets. Ecological Economics, 41, 491-507. DOI: 10.1016/ S0921-8009(02)00096-4.10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00096-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Kopperoinen, L., Itkonen, P. & Niemelä J. (2014). Using expert knowledge in combining green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning: an insight into a new place-based methodology Landsc. Ecol., 29(8), 1361-1375. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-014-0014-2.10.1007/s10980-014-0014-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewan, L. & Söderqvist T (2002). Knowledge and recognition of ecosystem services among the general public in a drainage basin in Scania, Southern Sweden. Ecological Economics, 42, 459-467. DOI: 10.1016/S0921- 8009(02)00127-1. Limburg, K.E. & Folke C. (1999). The ecology of ecosystem services: introduction to the special issue. EcologicalEconomics, 29, 179-182. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00008-7.10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00008-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., García Del Amo, D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Oteros-Rozas, E., Palacios-Agundez, I., Willaarts, B., González, J.A., Santos-Martín, F., Onaindia, M., López-Santiago, C.A. & Montes C. (2012). Uncovering ecosystem services bun-dles through social preferences. PLoS ONE, 7, e38970. DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0038970.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maynard, S., James, D. & Davidson A. (2010). The development of an ecosystem services framework for South East Queensland. Environ. Manag., 45(5), 881-895. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-010-9428-z.10.1007/s00267-010-9428-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Metzger, M.J., Rounsevell, M.D.A., Acosta-Michlik, L., Leemans, R. & Schröter D. (2006). The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 114, 69-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.025.10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.025]Search in Google Scholar
[Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2003). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-Being; A Framework for Assessment. Washington: World Resources Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[PetroviČ, F. & Muchová Z. (2013). The potential of the landscape with dispersed settlement: Case study Čadca town. In J. Fialová & H. KubíČková (Eds.), Public recreation and landscape protection - with man hand in hand (pp. 199-204). Proceedings from Scientific Conference May 1-3, 2013 Brno. Brno: Mendelova Univerzita.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schröter, D., Cramer, W, Leemans, R., Prentice, I.C., Araújo, M.B., Arnell, N.W, Bondeau, A., Bugmann, H., Carter, T.R., Gracia, C.A., de la Vega-Leinert, A.C., Erhard, M., Ewert, F., Glendining, M., House, J.I., Kankaanpää, S., Klein, R.J.T., Lavorel, S., Lindner, M., Metzger, M.J., Meyer, J., Mitchell, T.D., Reginster, I., Rounsevell, M., Sabaté, S., Sitch, S., Smith, B., Smith, J., Smith, P., Sykes, M.T., Tonicke, K., Tuiller, W, Tuck, G., Zae-hle, S. & Zierl B. (2005). Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science, 310, 1333-1337. DOI: 10.1126/science.1115233.10.1126/science.1115233]Search in Google Scholar
[Seják, J., Cudlín, P., Pokorný, J., Zapletal, M., PetŘíČek, V., Guth, J., Chuman, T, Romportl, D., SkoŘepová, I., Vacek, V., Vyskot, I., Černý, K., Hesslerová, P., BureŠová, R., Prokopová, M., Plch, R., Engstová, B. & Stará L. (2010). Hodnocení funkcí a služeb ekosystémě České republiky. Ústí nad Labem: Fakulta životního prostŘedí UJEP. http://fzp.ujep.cz/projekty/HodnoceniFunkciASluzebEkosystemuCR.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilson, M.A. & Howarth R.B. (2002). Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation. Ecological Economics, 41, 431-443. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00092-7.10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00092-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Yapp, G., Walker, J. & Tackway R. (2010). Linking vegetation type and condition to ecosystem goods and services. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 292-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.008.10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.008]Search in Google Scholar