The rules of the rationality of practical discourse in the light of ethics of discourse: An analysis of Robert Alexy’s proposal

ALEXY, R. (1989): Teoría de la Argumentación Jurídica [Theory of legal argumentation], translated by Manuel Atienza and Isabel Espejo. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.Search in Google Scholar

ALEXY, R. (1999): The special case thesis. In: Ratio Juris. An international journal of jurisprudence and philosophy of law, 12(4), pp. 374–384.10.1111/1467-9337.00131Search in Google Scholar

ALEXY, R. (2014): Constitutional rights and proportionality. In: Revus: journal for constitutional theory and philosophy of law, 22, pp. 51–65.10.4000/revus.2783Search in Google Scholar

ÁLVAREZ, S. (2008): Pluralismo Moral y Conflictos de Derechos Fundamentales [Moral pluralism and conflicts of fundamental rights]. In: Doxa. Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho, 31, pp. 21–54.10.14198/DOXA2008.31.02Search in Google Scholar

APEL, K. O. (1991): Teoría de la verdad y ética del discurso [Theory of truth and discourse ethics], translated by Norberto Smilg, Introduction by Adela Cortina. Barcelona: Paidós.Search in Google Scholar

ATIENZA, M. (2017): Las razones del Derecho. Teorías de la Argumentación Jurídica [The reasons of law. Theories of legal argumentation] Lima: Palestra.Search in Google Scholar

BESSON, S. (2005): The morality of conflict: Reasonable disagreement and the law. Oxford: Hart publishing.Search in Google Scholar

CHANG, R. (1998): Incommensurability, incomparability, and practical reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

ELSTER, J. (1998): Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139175005Search in Google Scholar

FETERIS, E. (2003): The Rationality of Legal Discourse in Habermas’s Discourse Theory. In: Informal Logic, 23(2), pp. 139–159.10.22329/il.v23i2.2164Search in Google Scholar

FETERIS, E. (2017): Fundamentals of legal argumentation: A survey of theories on justification of judicial decisions. Dordrecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

FORST, R. (2011): The right to justification: Elements of a constructivist theory of justice, translated by Jeffrey Flynn. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

GUTMANN, A. & THOMPSON, D. (2004): Why deliberative democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400826339Search in Google Scholar

HABERMAS, J. (2000): Aclaraciones a la ética del discurso [Clarifications to Discourse Ethics], translated by Manuel Jiménez Redondo. Barcelona: Trotta.Search in Google Scholar

JOHNSTON, J. S. (2016): Is there a need for transcendental arguments in discourse ethics? In: Educational Theory, 66(6), pp. 719–734.10.1111/edth.12212Search in Google Scholar

KÖLBEL, M. (2004): Faultless disagreement. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian society, 104(1), pp. 53–73.10.1111/j.0066-7373.2004.00081.xSearch in Google Scholar

LARIGUET, G. (2008): Dilemas y conflictos trágicos. Una investigación conceptual [Tragic Conflicts and Dilemmas: A Conceptual Enquiry]. Lima: Palestra.Search in Google Scholar

LARIGUET, G. (2011a): ¡Las normas deben ser acordadas por todos los afectados! Una crítica a la ética del discurso [Norms have to be agreed by all the affected! A critique of the discourse ethics]. In: Universitas. Revista de Filosofía, Derecho, Política, 14(7), pp. 75–89.Search in Google Scholar

LARIGUET, G. (2011b): Encrucijadas Morales. Una aproximación a los dilemas y su impacto en el razonamiento práctico [Moral crossroads: An approach to dilemmas and their impact on practical reasoning], Prologue by René González de la Vega. Madrid: Plaza y Valdés.Search in Google Scholar

MALIANDI, R. (2010): Discurso y Convergencia. La ética discursiva de Karl-Otto Apel y el laberinto de los conflictos [Discourse and Convergence: The discourse ethics of Karl-Otto Apel and the labyrinths of conflicts]. Buenos Aires: Oinos.Search in Google Scholar

MARTÍ, J. L. (2006): La República Deliberativa. Una teoría de la democracia [The Deliberative Republic: A Theory of Democracy]. Madrid: Marcial Pons.Search in Google Scholar

WALDRON, J. (1999): Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

WOJCIECHOWSKI, B. (2010): Discourse ethics as a basis of application of law. In: J. Jemielniak & P. Micklaszewicz (eds.): Interpretation of law in the global world: From particularism to a universal Approach. New York: Springer, pp. 53–69.10.1007/978-3-642-04886-9_3Search in Google Scholar

WOLF, S. (1992): Two levels of pluralism. In: Ethics, 102(4), pp. 785–798.10.1086/293448Search in Google Scholar

• Responsibility and idea of Slavism in Kollár’s and Štúr’s thinking
• Philosophical and geopolitical resources for ethical justification of the national and state revival of the suppressed nations in Central Europe
• The nation, Slavism, and Russia in the national emancipation conception of Svetozár Hurban Vajanský
• Cultural diversity and clashing narratives about national culture: A Central European stoic pragmatist perspective
• The national identity and Orthodox Church: The case of contemporary Ukraine
• Nation and language: Magyar and Slovak ideas of common good (The first half of the 19^th century)
• Morality and the nation: Was the birth of the European nation an immoral deviation?
• The vice of nationality and virtue of patriotism in 17^th century Czech Lands
• Editorial
• The question of the ethical issues of the nation in the community of nations: Inspiration of the Polish Pope John Paul II
• The crisis of modern man in the light of Masaryk’s national philosophy