<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>After more than six decades of systematic study of creativity, there is still no agreement regarding components essential to define creativity. Prior studies of implicit and explicit theories have suggested adding criteria to the standard definition of what creativity <italic>is</italic>; however, an alternative approach is to explore what creativity <italic>is not</italic>. The current investigation aimed to study both perspectives. The social validation method was employed in Study 1 (an open-ended questionnaire) to identify laypeople’s notions of creativity using content analysis of participant responses (<italic>n</italic> = 92). Results from Study 1 were used to build a quantitative questionnaire employed in Study 2 (<italic>n</italic> = 306). Descriptive statistics and Spearman Rank Correlations were used to analyze participant ratings in Study 2, showing consistent agreement that creativity is highly related to and overlapped with <italic>Imagination, Artistic Expression, Innovation, Originality</italic>, and <italic>Invention</italic>, while <italic>Knowledge, Ability, Unconventional Behavior, Morality</italic>, and <italic>Insanity</italic> were less related to and overlapped with creativity. Both implicit and explicit theories agreed on <italic>Originality</italic> and <italic>Innovation</italic> and disagreed on <italic>Artistic Expression, Imagination</italic>, and <italic>Invention</italic>. <italic>Usefulness</italic> received low ratings, although it is considered in all creativity definitions. <italic>Morality</italic> was not rated to be closely associated with creativity. Detailed findings are discussed with suggestions for future studies.</p></abstract>

After more than six decades of systematic study of creativity, there is still no agreement regarding components essential to define creativity. Prior studies of implicit and explicit theories have suggested adding criteria to the standard definition of what creativity is; however, an alternative approach is to explore what creativity is not. The current investigation aimed to study both perspectives. The social validation method was employed in Study 1 (an open-ended questionnaire) to identify laypeople’s notions of creativity using content analysis of participant responses (n = 92). Results from Study 1 were used to build a quantitative questionnaire employed in Study 2 (n = 306). Descriptive statistics and Spearman Rank Correlations were used to analyze participant ratings in Study 2, showing consistent agreement that creativity is highly related to and overlapped with Imagination, Artistic Expression, Innovation, Originality, and Invention, while Knowledge, Ability, Unconventional Behavior, Morality, and Insanity were less related to and overlapped with creativity. Both implicit and explicit theories agreed on Originality and Innovation and disagreed on Artistic Expression, Imagination, and Invention. Usefulness received low ratings, although it is considered in all creativity definitions. Morality was not rated to be closely associated with creativity. Detailed findings are discussed with suggestions for future studies.

Association, Overlap, and Inhibition: A Study of Implicit Theories of Creativity

Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"Association, Overlap, and Inhibition: A Study of Implicit Theories of Creativity"}

After more than six decades of systematic study of creativity, there is still no agreement regarding components essential to define creativity. Prior studies...

Association, Overlap, and Inhibition: A Study of Implicit Theories of Creativity

Online veröffentlicht: 26. Jan. 2021

Seitenbereich: 251 - 283

Eingereicht: 10. März 2020

Akzeptiert: 13. Dez. 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2020-0014

Schlüsselwörter
Creativity, Implicit theories, Explicit theories, Beliefs, Social validation

© 2020 Ahmed M. Abdulla Alabbasi et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Association, Overlap, and Inhibition: A Study of Implicit Theories of Creativity

Online veröffentlicht: 26. Jan. 2021

Seitenbereich: 251 - 283

Eingereicht: 10. März 2020

Akzeptiert: 13. Dez. 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2020-0014

SchlüsselwörterCreativity, Implicit theories, Explicit theories, Beliefs, Social validation

© 2020 Ahmed M. Abdulla Alabbasi et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Schlüsselwörter
Creativity, Implicit theories, Explicit theories, Beliefs, Social validation