Effect of the inferior alveolar nerve block injection versus maxillary infiltration with two local anesthetic agents on cardiovascular parameters: A randomized comparative double-blind clinical trial
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Torres-Lagares D, Serrera-Figallo MÁ, Machuca-Portillo G, Corcuera-Flores JR, Machuca-Portillo C, Castillo-Oyagüe R, et al. Cardiovascular effect of dental anesthesia with articaine (40 mg with epinefrine 0.5 mg% and 40 mg with epinefrine 1 mg%) versus mepivacaine (30 mg and 20 mg with epinefrine 1 mg%) in medically compromised cardiac patients: A cross-over, randomized, single blinded study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17(4):655-60.Search in Google Scholar
Sharifi R, Nazari H, Bolourchi P, Khazaei S, Parirokh M. The most painful site of maxillary anterior infiltrations. Dent Res J. 2016;13(6):539-43.Search in Google Scholar
Troullos ES, Goldstein DS, Hargreaves KM, Dionne RA. Plasma epinephrine levels and cardiovascular response to high administered doses of epinephrine in local anesthesia. Anesth Progr. 1987;34(1):10-3.Search in Google Scholar
Abu-Mostafa N, Al-Showaikhat F, Al-Shubbar F, Al-Zawad K, Al-Zawad F. Hemodynamic changes following injection of local anesthetics with different concentrations of epinephrine during simple tooth extraction: A prospective randomized clinical trial. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015;7(4):471-6.Search in Google Scholar
Scarparo HC, Maia RN, de Gois SR, Costa FW, Ribeiro TR, Soares EC. Effects of mepivacaine 2% with epinephrine in the cardiovascular activity of patients undergoing third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(1):9-12.Search in Google Scholar
Becker DE, Reed KL. Local anesthetics: review of pharmacological considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012;59(2):90-102.Search in Google Scholar
Saxena P, Gupta SK, Newaskar V, Chandra A. Advances in dental local anesthesia techniques and devices: An update. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2013;4(1):19-4.Search in Google Scholar
de Morais HH, de Santana Santos T, da Costa Araújo FA, de Freitas Xavier RL, Vajgel A, de Holanda Vasconcellos RJ. Hemodynamic changes comparing 2% lidocaine and 4% articaine with epinephrine 1: 100,000 in lower third molar surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(4):1204-11.Search in Google Scholar
Balasubramaniyan N, Rayapati DK, Puttiah RH, Tavane P, Singh SE, Rangan V, Kalakunta PR. Evaluation of anxiety induced cardiovascular response in known hypertensive patients undergoing exodontia-a prospective study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(8):123-7.Search in Google Scholar
Managutti A, Prakasam M, Puthanakar N, Menat S, Shah D, Patel H. Comparative analysis of local anesthesia with 2 different concentrations of adrenaline: a randomized and single blind study. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(3):24-7.Search in Google Scholar
Meechan JG, Cole B, Welbury RR. Anaesthesia: The influence of two different dental local anaesthetic solutions on the haemo-dynamic responses of children undergoing restorative dentistry: a randomised, single-blind, split-mouth study. Br Dent J. 2001;190(9):502-4.Search in Google Scholar
Sanadhya YK, Sanadhya S, Jalihal S, Nagarajappa R, Ramesh G, Tak M. Hemodynamic, ventilator, and ECG changes in pediatric patients undergoing extraction. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2013;31(1):10-6.Search in Google Scholar
Raja DC, Kapoor A, Sinha A, Kashyap S, Khanna R, Kumar S, Garg N, Tewari S, Goel P. Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: assessing the role of ivabradine. Indian Heart J. 2018;70(2):246-51.Search in Google Scholar
Ezmek B, Arslan A, Delilbasi C, Sencift K. Comparison of hemodynamic effects of lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacaine solutions without vasoconstrictor in hypertensive patients. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18(4):354-9.Search in Google Scholar
Lequeux B, Uzan C, Rehman MB. Does resting heart rate measured by the physician reflect the patient’s true resting heart rate? White-coat heart rate. Indian Heart J. 2018;70(1):93-8.Search in Google Scholar
Fu Y, Liu J. System design for wearable blood oxygen saturation and pulse measurement device. Procedia Manuf. 2015;3:1187-94.Search in Google Scholar
Santos CF, Modena KC, Giglio FP, Sakai VT, Calvo AM, Colombini BL. Epinephrine concentration (1: 100,000 or 1: 200,000) does not affect the clinical efficacy of 4% articaine for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(12):2445-52.Search in Google Scholar
Murillo‐Benítez M, Martín‐González J, Jiménez‐Sánchez MC, Cabanillas‐Balsera D, Velasco‐Ortega E, Segura‐Egea JJ. Association between dental anxiety and intraoperative pain during root canal treatment: a cross‐sectional study. Int Endod J. 2020;53(4):447-54.Search in Google Scholar