Noise Generation Methods Preserving Image Color Intensity Distributions

1. Murai, Y, D. Whitney. Serial Dependence Revealed in History-Dependent Perceptual Templates. – Curr Biol., Vol. 31, 2021, No 14, pp. 3185-3191.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.05.006.831910734087105 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Bialek, W. Physical Limits to Sensation and Perception. – Annual Review of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Vol. 16, 1987, pp. 455-478.10.1146/annurev.bb.16.060187.002323 Search in Google Scholar

3. Faisal, A. A., L. P. Selen, D. M. Wolpert. Noise in the Nervous System. Nature Reviews. – Neuroscience, Vol. 9, 2008, No 4, pp. 292-303.10.1038/nrn2258 Search in Google Scholar

4. Sternad, D. It’s Not (Only) the Mean That Matters: Variability, Noise and Exploration in Skill Learning. – Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci., Vol. 20, 2018, pp. 183-195. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.01.004.605154530035207 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Pelli, D. G., B. Farell. Why Use Noise? – Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, Vol. 16, 1999, No 3, pp. 647-653.10.1364/JOSAA.16.000647 Search in Google Scholar

6. Hu, X., Y. Qin, X. Ying et al. Temporal Characteristics of Visual Processing in Amblyopia. – Front Neurosci., Vol. 15, 2021, 673491. Published 3 Jun 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.673491.821108834149348 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Mc Anany, J. J., J. C. Park, G. A. Fishman, R. A. Hyde. Contrast Sensitivity and Equivalent Intrinsic Noise in X-Linked Retinoschisis. – Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol., Vol. 11, 2022, No 3,7. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.3.7.891456735258559 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Liu, R., M. Kwon. Increased Equivalent Input Noise in Glaucomatous Central Vision: Is It due to Undersampling of Retinal Ganglion Cells? – Invest Ophthalmol Vis. Sci., Vol. 61, 2020, No 8, 10. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.61.8.10.742573432645132 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9. Braham Chaouche, A., D. Silvestre, A. Trognon, A. Arleo, R. Allard. Age-Related Decline in Motion Contrast Sensitivity due to Lower Absorption Rate of Cones and Calculation Efficiency. – Sci. Rep., Vol. 10, 2020, No 1, 16521. Published 5 October 2020. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73322-7.753641533020552 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Manning, C., M. S. Tibber, S. C. Dakin. Visual Integration of Direction and Orientation Information in Autistic Children. – ADLI, Vol. 2, 2017, pp. 1-16. DOI: 10.1177/2396941517694626. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

11. Bocheva, N., I. Hristov, S. Stefanov, T. Totev, S. N. Staykova, M. S. Mihaylova. How the External Visual Noise Affects Motion Direction Discrimination in Autism Spectrum Disorder. – Behav Sci (Basel), Vol. 12, 2022, No 4, 113. Published 18 April 2022. DOI: 10.3390/bs12040113.903171035447685 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Solomon, J. A., D. G. Pelli. The Visual Filter Mediating Letter Identification. – Nature, Vol. 36, 1994, No 9 (6479), pp. 395-397. https://doi.org/10.1038/369395a010.1038/369395a0 Search in Google Scholar

13. Ridder, W. H. 3rd. A Comparison of Contrast Sensitivity and Sweep Visual Evoked Potential (sVEP) Acuity Estimates in Normal Humans. – Doc. Ophthalmol., Vol. 139, 2019, No 3, pp. 207-219. DOI: 10.1007/s10633-019-09712-8.31414313 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Vera-Diaz, F. A., P. J. Bex, A. Ferreira, A. Kosovicheva. Binocular Temporal Visual Processing in Myopia. – J. of Vis., Vol. 18, 2018, No 11, 17. DOI: 10.1167/18.11.17.620555930372727 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Wang, H., G. E. Legge. Comparing the Minimum Spatial-Frequency Content for Recognizing Chinese and Alphabet Characters. – J. of Vis., Vol. 18, 2018, No 1, 1. DOI: 10.1167/18.1.1.574964829297056 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Hussain, Z., P. J. Bennett. Perceptual Learning of Detection of Textures in Noise. – J. of Vis., Vol. 20, 2020, No 7, 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.7.22.742495632692831 Search in Google Scholar

17. Lindborg, A., T. S. Andersen. Bayesian Binding and Fusion Models Explain Illusion and Enhancement Effects in Audiovisual Speech Perception. – PloS One., Vol. 16, 2021, No 2, e0246986. Published 19 February 2021. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246986.789537233606815 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Ohnishi, M, K. Oda. Unresolvable Pixels Contribute to Character Legibility: Another Reason Why High-Resolution Images Appear Clearer. – Iperception, Vol. 11, 2020, No 6, 2041669520981102. Published 26 December 2020. DOI: 10.1177/2041669520981102.776832433489075 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Eckstein, M. P., A. J. Ahumada. Classification Images: A Tool to Analyze Visual Strategies. – J. of Vis., Vol. 2, 2002, No 1, 1x. https://doi.org/10.1167/2.1.i10.1167/2.1.i Search in Google Scholar

20. Levi, D. M., S. A. Klein. Noise Provides Some New Signals about the Spatial Vision of Amblyopes. – Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 23, 2003, pp. 2522-2526.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-07-02522.2003 Search in Google Scholar

21. Allard, R., J. Faubert. Double Dissociation between First- and Second-Order Processing. – Vis. Res., Vol. 47, 2007, pp. 1129-1141. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.01.010.17363024 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. Allard, R., J. Faubert. First- and Second-Order Motion Mechanisms are Distinct at Low but Common at High Temporal Frequencies. – J. of Vis., Vol. 8, 2008, pp. 1-17. DOI: 10.1167/8.2.12.18318638 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23. Drewes, J., W. Zhu, D. Melcher. The Optimal Spatial Noise for Continuous Flash Suppression Masking is Pink. – Sci. Rep., Vol. 10, 2020, 6943. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63888-710.1038/s41598-020-63888-7718169632332984 Search in Google Scholar

24. Han, S., D. Alais. Strength of Continuous Flash Suppression is Optimal when Target and Masker Modulation Rates are Matched. – J. of Vis., Vol. 18, 2018, No 3, 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/18.3.3.29677318 Search in Google Scholar

25. Di Mattina, C., C. L. Baker. Modeling Second-Order Boundary Perception: A Machine Learning Approach. – PloS Comput Biol., Vol. 15, 2019, No 3, e1006829. Published 18 March 2019. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006829.643856930883556 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

26. Ahumada, A. J. Classification Image Weights and Internal Noise Level Estimation. – J. of Vis., Vol. 2, 2002, No 1, pp. 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1167/2.1.810.1167/2.1.812678600 Search in Google Scholar

27. Gold, J., A. Sekuler, P. Bennett. Characterizing Perceptual Learning with External Noise. – Cognitive Science, Vol. 28, 2004, pp. 167-207.10.1207/s15516709cog2802_3 Search in Google Scholar

28. Jeon, S. T., Z. L. Lu, B. A. Dosher. Characterizing Perceptual Performance at Multiple Discrimination Precisions in External Noise. – Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optica Publishing Group, Vol. 26, 2009, pp. B43-B58. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.26.000B4310.1364/JOSAA.26.000B43282944619884915 Search in Google Scholar

29. Taylor, C. P., P. J. Bennett, A. B. Sekuler. Evidence for Adjustable Bandwidth Orientation Channels. – Front. Psychol., Vol. 5, 2014, No 578. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00578.405401424971069 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

30. Gold, J. M. Information Processing Correlates of a Size-Contrast Illusion. – Front. Psychol., Vol. 5, 2014, No 142. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00142.392854024600430 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

31. Treviño, M., B. Dela Torre-Valdovinos, E. Manjarrez. Noise Improves Visual Motion Discrimination via a Stochastic Resonance-Like Phenomenon. – Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 10, 2016, 572. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.0057210.3389/fnhum.2016.00572512010927932960 Search in Google Scholar

32. Benuci, A. Motor-Related Signals Support Localization Invariance for Stable Visual Perception. – PloS Computational Biology, Vol. 18, 2022, No 3, e1009928. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.100992810.1371/journal.pcbi.1009928894759035286305 Search in Google Scholar

33. Söderlund, G., J. Åsberg Johnels, B. Rothén, E. Torstensson-Hultberg, A. Magnusson, L. Fälth. Sensory White Noise Improves Reading Skills and Memory Recall in Children with Reading Disability. – Brain and Behavior, Vol. 11, 2021, No 7, e02114. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.211410.1002/brb3.2114832303234096202 Search in Google Scholar

34. Park, W. J., K. B. Schauder, R. Zhang, L. Bennetto, D. Tadin. High Internal Noise and Poor External Noise Filtering Characterize Perception in Autism Spectrum Disorder. – Scientific Reports, Vol. 7, 2017, No 1, 17584.10.1038/s41598-017-17676-5573055529242499 Search in Google Scholar

35. Gao, X., E. A. Stine-Morrow, S. R. Noh, R. T. Eskew. Visual Noise Disrupts Conceptual Integration in Reading. – Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Vol. 18, 2011, No 1, pp. 83-88.10.3758/s13423-010-0014-421327368 Search in Google Scholar

36. Wang, Zh., A. Bovik, H. Sheikh, E. Simoncelli. Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity. – IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 13, April 2004, No 4, pp. 600-612. DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2003.819861. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

37. Simoncelli, E. P., B. A. Olshausen. Natural Image Statistics and Neural Representation. – Annual Review of Neuroscience, Vol. 24, 2001, pp. 1193-1216. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.119310.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.119311520932 Search in Google Scholar

38. Krause, M. R., C. C. Pack. Contextual Modulation and Stimulus Selectivity in Extrastriate Cortex. – Vision Research, Vol. 104, 2014, pp. 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2014.10.00610.1016/j.visres.2014.10.00625449337 Search in Google Scholar

39. Shtereva, K., M. Stefanova, N. Bocheva, B. Hadjiyska, T. Totev, M. Mihaylova. Grapheme-Level Errors in Reading Words and Pseudo-Words by Children and Adolescent with Autism Spectrum Disorder. – In: Proc. of International Conference Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, Albena, 2020, pp. 221-232. ISBN 978-954-9458-28-2. Search in Google Scholar

40. Boyat, A., B. Joshi. A Review Paper: Noise Models in Digital Image Processing. – ArXiv, abs/1505.03489, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

41. Suryanarayana, S., B. Deekshatulu, K. Lal Kishore, R. Kumar. Estimation and Removal of Gaussian Noise in Digital Images. – International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Vol. 5, 2012, pp. 23-33. Search in Google Scholar

42. Boncelet, Ch. Image Noise Models. – In Bovik, A. C. Handbook of Image and Video Processing, 2005. Search in Google Scholar

43. Goodman, J. Some Fundamental Properties of Speckle. – Journal of the Optical Society of America, Vol. 66, 1976, pp. 1145-1150.10.1364/JOSA.66.001145 Search in Google Scholar