Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Student interactions during class activities: a mathematical model

Communications in Applied and Industrial Mathematics's Cover Image
Communications in Applied and Industrial Mathematics
Special Issue on Mathematical modelling for complex systems: multi-agents methods. Guest Editor: Elena De Angelis

Zitieren

1. A. Sfard, There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning, Educational studies in mathematics, vol. 46, no. 1-3, pp. 13-57, 2001.10.1007/0-306-48085-9_1Search in Google Scholar

2. A. H. Schoenfeld, What makes for powerful classrooms, and how can we support teachers in creating them? a story of research and practice, productively intertwined, Educational Researcher, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 404-412, 2014.10.3102/0013189X14554450Search in Google Scholar

3. M. Hannula, J. Evans, G. Philippou, and R. Zan, Affect in mathematics education-exploring theoretical frameworks. research forum., International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

4. P. Di Martino and R. Zan, The construct of attitude in mathematics education, in From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education, pp. 51-72, Springer, 2015.10.1007/978-3-319-06808-4_3Search in Google Scholar

5. C. Andrà and P. Liljedahl, “I sense" and “I can": Framing intuitions in social interactions, in Pro- ceedings of the joint meeting of PME and PMENA, vol. 1, pp. 49-56, Vancouver, CA:PME, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

6. C. Andrà, D. Brunetto, N. Parolini, and M. Verani, 'I can - you can': Cooperation in group activities, in Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (K. Krainer and N. Vondrová, eds.), pp. 1109-1115, Feb. 2015.Search in Google Scholar

7. C. Andrà, D. Brunetto, N. Parolini, and M. Verani, “Four fundamental modes of participation in mathematics group activities." (to appear).Search in Google Scholar

8. N. Bellomo, Modeling complex living systems. Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology, Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2008. A kinetic theory and stochastic game approach.Search in Google Scholar

9. G. Albi, L. Pareschi, G. Toscani, and M. Zanella, Recent advances in opinion modeling: Control and social inuence, in Active Particles, Volume 1 : Advances in Theory, Models, and Applications (N. Bellomo, P. Degond, and E. Tadmor, eds.), pp. 49-98, Springer International Publishing, 2017.10.1007/978-3-319-49996-3_2Search in Google Scholar

10. J. Lorenz, Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: A survey, International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1819-1838, 2007.10.1142/S0129183107011789Search in Google Scholar

11. J. R. French Jr, A formal theory of social power., Psychological review, vol. 63, no. 3, p. 181, 1956.10.1037/h004612313323174Search in Google Scholar

12. R. Hegselmann, U. Krause, et al., Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 5, no. 3, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

13. V. D. Blondel, J. M. Hendrickx, and J. N. Tsitsiklis, On krause's multi-agent consensus model with state-dependent connectivity, IEEE transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 2586-2597, 2009.10.1109/TAC.2009.2031211Search in Google Scholar

14. C. Canuto, F. Fagnani, and P. Tilli, An Eulerian approach to the analysis of Krause's consensus models, SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 243-265, 2012.10.1137/100793177Search in Google Scholar

15. J. Lorenz, Multidimensional opinion dynamics when confidence changes, Economic Complexity, Aix- en-Provence, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

16. J. Lorenz, H. Rauhut, F. Schweitzer, and D. Helbing, How social inuence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect, Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 108, no. 22, pp. 9020-9025, 2011.10.1073/pnas.1008636108Search in Google Scholar

17. R. Kaur, R. Kumar, A. P. Bhondekar, and P. Kapur, Human opinion dynamics: An inspiration to solve complex optimization problems, Scientific reports, vol. 3, 2013.10.1038/srep03008380111324141795Search in Google Scholar

18. S. Wongkaew, M. Caponigro, and A. Borzì, On the control through leadership of the hegselmann- krause opinion formation model, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, vol. 25, no. 03, pp. 565-585, 2015.10.1142/S0218202515400060Search in Google Scholar

19. J. Lorenz, A stabilization theorem for dynamics of continuous opinions, Physica A: Statistical Me- chanics and its Applications, vol. 355, no. 1, pp. 217-223, 2005.10.1016/j.physa.2005.02.086Search in Google Scholar

20. J. M. Hendrickx, G. Shi, and K. H. Johansson, Finite-time consensus using stochastic matrices with positive diagonals, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 1070-1073, 2015.10.1109/TAC.2014.2352691Search in Google Scholar

21. L. Radford, Three key concepts of the theory of objectification: Knowledge, knowing, and learning, Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7-44, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

22. G. Williams and P. Liljedahl, Researching `thinking classrooms', in Proceedings of the 38th Conference of the International Group for PME and the 36th Conference of the North American Chapter of the PME (Vol. 1), p. 249, Citeseer, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

23. M. Huberman, The model of the independent artisan in teachers' professional relations, Teachers' work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts, pp. 11-50, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

24. A. H. Schoenfeld, Toward professional development for teachers grounded in a theory of decision making, ZDM, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 457-469, 2011.10.1007/s11858-011-0307-8Search in Google Scholar

25. C. Andrà, N. Parolini, and M. Verani, BetOnMath. Azzardo e matematica a scuola. Springer-Verlag Italia, 2016.10.1007/978-88-470-3942-1Search in Google Scholar

26. D. B. McLeod, Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization, Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, pp. 575-596, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

27. A. H. Schoenfeld, Chapter 2: On modeling teachers' in-the-moment decision making, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, vol. 14, pp. 45-96, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

28. A. H. Schoenfeld, Toward a theory of teaching-in-context, Issues in Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-94, 1998.10.1016/S1080-9724(99)80076-7Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2038-0909
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
Volume Open
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Mathematik, Numerik und wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Angewandte Mathematik