[1. A. Sfard, There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning, Educational studies in mathematics, vol. 46, no. 1-3, pp. 13-57, 2001.10.1007/0-306-48085-9_1]Search in Google Scholar
[2. A. H. Schoenfeld, What makes for powerful classrooms, and how can we support teachers in creating them? a story of research and practice, productively intertwined, Educational Researcher, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 404-412, 2014.10.3102/0013189X14554450]Search in Google Scholar
[3. M. Hannula, J. Evans, G. Philippou, and R. Zan, Affect in mathematics education-exploring theoretical frameworks. research forum., International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. P. Di Martino and R. Zan, The construct of attitude in mathematics education, in From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education, pp. 51-72, Springer, 2015.10.1007/978-3-319-06808-4_3]Search in Google Scholar
[5. C. Andrà and P. Liljedahl, “I sense" and “I can": Framing intuitions in social interactions, in Pro- ceedings of the joint meeting of PME and PMENA, vol. 1, pp. 49-56, Vancouver, CA:PME, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. C. Andrà, D. Brunetto, N. Parolini, and M. Verani, 'I can - you can': Cooperation in group activities, in Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (K. Krainer and N. Vondrová, eds.), pp. 1109-1115, Feb. 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. C. Andrà, D. Brunetto, N. Parolini, and M. Verani, “Four fundamental modes of participation in mathematics group activities." (to appear).]Search in Google Scholar
[8. N. Bellomo, Modeling complex living systems. Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology, Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2008. A kinetic theory and stochastic game approach.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. G. Albi, L. Pareschi, G. Toscani, and M. Zanella, Recent advances in opinion modeling: Control and social inuence, in Active Particles, Volume 1 : Advances in Theory, Models, and Applications (N. Bellomo, P. Degond, and E. Tadmor, eds.), pp. 49-98, Springer International Publishing, 2017.10.1007/978-3-319-49996-3_2]Search in Google Scholar
[10. J. Lorenz, Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: A survey, International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1819-1838, 2007.10.1142/S0129183107011789]Search in Google Scholar
[11. J. R. French Jr, A formal theory of social power., Psychological review, vol. 63, no. 3, p. 181, 1956.10.1037/h004612313323174]Search in Google Scholar
[12. R. Hegselmann, U. Krause, et al., Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 5, no. 3, 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. V. D. Blondel, J. M. Hendrickx, and J. N. Tsitsiklis, On krause's multi-agent consensus model with state-dependent connectivity, IEEE transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 2586-2597, 2009.10.1109/TAC.2009.2031211]Search in Google Scholar
[14. C. Canuto, F. Fagnani, and P. Tilli, An Eulerian approach to the analysis of Krause's consensus models, SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 243-265, 2012.10.1137/100793177]Search in Google Scholar
[15. J. Lorenz, Multidimensional opinion dynamics when confidence changes, Economic Complexity, Aix- en-Provence, 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. J. Lorenz, H. Rauhut, F. Schweitzer, and D. Helbing, How social inuence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect, Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 108, no. 22, pp. 9020-9025, 2011.10.1073/pnas.1008636108]Search in Google Scholar
[17. R. Kaur, R. Kumar, A. P. Bhondekar, and P. Kapur, Human opinion dynamics: An inspiration to solve complex optimization problems, Scientific reports, vol. 3, 2013.10.1038/srep03008380111324141795]Search in Google Scholar
[18. S. Wongkaew, M. Caponigro, and A. Borzì, On the control through leadership of the hegselmann- krause opinion formation model, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, vol. 25, no. 03, pp. 565-585, 2015.10.1142/S0218202515400060]Search in Google Scholar
[19. J. Lorenz, A stabilization theorem for dynamics of continuous opinions, Physica A: Statistical Me- chanics and its Applications, vol. 355, no. 1, pp. 217-223, 2005.10.1016/j.physa.2005.02.086]Search in Google Scholar
[20. J. M. Hendrickx, G. Shi, and K. H. Johansson, Finite-time consensus using stochastic matrices with positive diagonals, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 1070-1073, 2015.10.1109/TAC.2014.2352691]Search in Google Scholar
[21. L. Radford, Three key concepts of the theory of objectification: Knowledge, knowing, and learning, Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7-44, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. G. Williams and P. Liljedahl, Researching `thinking classrooms', in Proceedings of the 38th Conference of the International Group for PME and the 36th Conference of the North American Chapter of the PME (Vol. 1), p. 249, Citeseer, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. M. Huberman, The model of the independent artisan in teachers' professional relations, Teachers' work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts, pp. 11-50, 1993.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. A. H. Schoenfeld, Toward professional development for teachers grounded in a theory of decision making, ZDM, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 457-469, 2011.10.1007/s11858-011-0307-8]Search in Google Scholar
[25. C. Andrà, N. Parolini, and M. Verani, BetOnMath. Azzardo e matematica a scuola. Springer-Verlag Italia, 2016.10.1007/978-88-470-3942-1]Search in Google Scholar
[26. D. B. McLeod, Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization, Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, pp. 575-596, 1992.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. A. H. Schoenfeld, Chapter 2: On modeling teachers' in-the-moment decision making, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, vol. 14, pp. 45-96, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. A. H. Schoenfeld, Toward a theory of teaching-in-context, Issues in Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-94, 1998.10.1016/S1080-9724(99)80076-7]Search in Google Scholar