Preimplantation Genetic Testing within the Public Healthcare System in Slovenia

1 Handyside A. Sex and the single cell. New Sci. 1990;126(1713):34–5. HandysideA Sex and the single cell New Sci 1990 126 1713 34 5 Search in Google Scholar

2 Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, Winston RM. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature. 1990;344(6268):768–70. HandysideAH KontogianniEH HardyK WinstonRM Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification Nature 1990 344 6268 768 70 Search in Google Scholar

3 Group EP-SP-AW, Coonen E, Rubio C, Christopikou D, Dimitriadou E, Gontar J, et al. ESHRE PGT Consortium good practice recommendations for the detection of structural and numerical chromosomal aberrations. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020(3):hoaa017. Group EP-SP-AW CoonenE RubioC ChristopikouD DimitriadouE GontarJ ESHRE PGT Consortium good practice recommendations for the detection of structural and numerical chromosomal aberrations Hum Reprod Open 2020 2020 3 hoaa017 Search in Google Scholar

4 Ginoza MEC, Isasi R. Regulating Preimplantation Genetic Testing across the World: A Comparison of International Policy and Ethical Perspectives. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020;10(5). GinozaMEC IsasiR Regulating Preimplantation Genetic Testing across the World: A Comparison of International Policy and Ethical Perspectives Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2020 10 5 Search in Google Scholar

5 Stimpfel M, Vrtacnik-Bokal E, Pozlep B, Virant-Klun I. Comparison of GnRH agonist, GnRH antagonist, and GnRH antagonist mild protocol of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in good prognosis patients. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:385049. StimpfelM Vrtacnik-BokalE PozlepB Virant-KlunI Comparison of GnRH agonist, GnRH antagonist, and GnRH antagonist mild protocol of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in good prognosis patients Int J Endocrinol 2015 2015 385049 Search in Google Scholar

6 Hardy T. The role of prenatal diagnosis following preimplantation genetic testing for single-gene conditions: A historical overview of evolving technologies and clinical practice. Prenat Diagn. 2020;40(6):647–51. HardyT The role of prenatal diagnosis following preimplantation genetic testing for single-gene conditions: A historical overview of evolving technologies and clinical practice Prenat Diagn 2020 40 6 647 51 Search in Google Scholar

7 Harton GL, Harper JC, Coonen E, Pehlivan T, Vesela K, Wilton L, et al. ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for fluorescence in situ hybridization-based PGD. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(1):25–32. HartonGL HarperJC CoonenE PehlivanT VeselaK WiltonL ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for fluorescence in situ hybridization-based PGD Hum Reprod 2011 26 1 25 32 Search in Google Scholar

8 Harton GL, De Rycke M, Fiorentino F, Moutou C, SenGupta S, Traeger-Synodinos J, et al. ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for amplification-based PGD. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(1):33–40. HartonGL De RyckeM FiorentinoF MoutouC SenGuptaS Traeger-SynodinosJ ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for amplification-based PGD Hum Reprod 2011 26 1 33 40 Search in Google Scholar

9 van Montfoort A, Carvalho F, Coonen E, Kokkali G, Moutou C, Rubio C, et al. ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XIX-XX: PGT analyses from 2016 to 2017(dagger). Hum Reprod Open. 2021;2021(3):hoab024. van MontfoortA CarvalhoF CoonenE KokkaliG MoutouC RubioC ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XIX-XX: PGT analyses from 2016 to 2017(dagger) Hum Reprod Open 2021 2021 3 hoab024 Search in Google Scholar

10 Hreinsson J, Lundin K, Iwarsson E, Hausken J, Einarsson S, Grondahl ML, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing legislation and accessibility in the Nordic countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(6):716–21. HreinssonJ LundinK IwarssonE HauskenJ EinarssonS GrondahlML Preimplantation genetic testing legislation and accessibility in the Nordic countries Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020 99 6 716 21 Search in Google Scholar

11 Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter CH, Kupka MS, Wyns C, Mocanu E, Motrenko T, et al. Survey on ART and IUI: legislation, regulation, funding and registries in European countries: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020(1):hoz044. Calhaz-JorgeC De GeyterCH KupkaMS WynsC MocanuE MotrenkoT Survey on ART and IUI: legislation, regulation, funding and registries in European countries: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Hum Reprod Open 2020 2020 1 hoz044 Search in Google Scholar

12 Scott RT, Jr., Upham KM, Forman EJ, Zhao T, Treff NR. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blasto-cyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):624–30. ScottRTJr. UphamKM FormanEJ ZhaoT TreffNR Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blasto-cyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial Fertil Steril 2013 100 3 624 30 Search in Google Scholar

13 Acharya KS, Acharya CR, Bishop K, Harris B, Raburn D, Muasher SJ. Freezing of all embryos in in vitro fertilization is beneficial in high responders, but not intermediate and low responders: an analysis of 82,935 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(5):880–7. AcharyaKS AcharyaCR BishopK HarrisB RaburnD MuasherSJ Freezing of all embryos in in vitro fertilization is beneficial in high responders, but not intermediate and low responders: an analysis of 82,935 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry Fertil Steril 2018 110 5 880 7 Search in Google Scholar