This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Handyside A. Sex and the single cell. New Sci. 1990;126(1713):34–5.HandysideASex and the single cellNew Sci19901261713345Search in Google Scholar
Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, Winston RM. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature. 1990;344(6268):768–70.HandysideAHKontogianniEHHardyKWinstonRMPregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplificationNature1990344626876870Search in Google Scholar
Group EP-SP-AW, Coonen E, Rubio C, Christopikou D, Dimitriadou E, Gontar J, et al. ESHRE PGT Consortium good practice recommendations for the detection of structural and numerical chromosomal aberrations. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020(3):hoaa017.Group EP-SP-AWCoonenERubioCChristopikouDDimitriadouEGontarJESHRE PGT Consortium good practice recommendations for the detection of structural and numerical chromosomal aberrationsHum Reprod Open202020203hoaa017Search in Google Scholar
Ginoza MEC, Isasi R. Regulating Preimplantation Genetic Testing across the World: A Comparison of International Policy and Ethical Perspectives. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020;10(5).GinozaMECIsasiRRegulating Preimplantation Genetic Testing across the World: A Comparison of International Policy and Ethical PerspectivesCold Spring Harb Perspect Med2020105Search in Google Scholar
Stimpfel M, Vrtacnik-Bokal E, Pozlep B, Virant-Klun I. Comparison of GnRH agonist, GnRH antagonist, and GnRH antagonist mild protocol of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in good prognosis patients. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:385049.StimpfelMVrtacnik-BokalEPozlepBVirant-KlunIComparison of GnRH agonist, GnRH antagonist, and GnRH antagonist mild protocol of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in good prognosis patientsInt J Endocrinol20152015385049Search in Google Scholar
Hardy T. The role of prenatal diagnosis following preimplantation genetic testing for single-gene conditions: A historical overview of evolving technologies and clinical practice. Prenat Diagn. 2020;40(6):647–51.HardyTThe role of prenatal diagnosis following preimplantation genetic testing for single-gene conditions: A historical overview of evolving technologies and clinical practicePrenat Diagn202040664751Search in Google Scholar
Harton GL, Harper JC, Coonen E, Pehlivan T, Vesela K, Wilton L, et al. ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for fluorescence in situ hybridization-based PGD. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(1):25–32.HartonGLHarperJCCoonenEPehlivanTVeselaKWiltonLESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for fluorescence in situ hybridization-based PGDHum Reprod20112612532Search in Google Scholar
Harton GL, De Rycke M, Fiorentino F, Moutou C, SenGupta S, Traeger-Synodinos J, et al. ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for amplification-based PGD. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(1):33–40.HartonGLDe RyckeMFiorentinoFMoutouCSenGuptaSTraeger-SynodinosJESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for amplification-based PGDHum Reprod20112613340Search in Google Scholar
van Montfoort A, Carvalho F, Coonen E, Kokkali G, Moutou C, Rubio C, et al. ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XIX-XX: PGT analyses from 2016 to 2017(dagger). Hum Reprod Open. 2021;2021(3):hoab024.van MontfoortACarvalhoFCoonenEKokkaliGMoutouCRubioCESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XIX-XX: PGT analyses from 2016 to 2017(dagger)Hum Reprod Open202120213hoab024Search in Google Scholar
Hreinsson J, Lundin K, Iwarsson E, Hausken J, Einarsson S, Grondahl ML, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing legislation and accessibility in the Nordic countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(6):716–21.HreinssonJLundinKIwarssonEHauskenJEinarssonSGrondahlMLPreimplantation genetic testing legislation and accessibility in the Nordic countriesActa Obstet Gynecol Scand202099671621Search in Google Scholar
Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter CH, Kupka MS, Wyns C, Mocanu E, Motrenko T, et al. Survey on ART and IUI: legislation, regulation, funding and registries in European countries: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020(1):hoz044.Calhaz-JorgeCDe GeyterCHKupkaMSWynsCMocanuEMotrenkoTSurvey on ART and IUI: legislation, regulation, funding and registries in European countries: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)Hum Reprod Open202020201hoz044Search in Google Scholar
Scott RT, Jr., Upham KM, Forman EJ, Zhao T, Treff NR. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blasto-cyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):624–30.ScottRTJr.UphamKMFormanEJZhaoTTreffNRCleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blasto-cyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trialFertil Steril2013100362430Search in Google Scholar
Acharya KS, Acharya CR, Bishop K, Harris B, Raburn D, Muasher SJ. Freezing of all embryos in in vitro fertilization is beneficial in high responders, but not intermediate and low responders: an analysis of 82,935 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(5):880–7.AcharyaKSAcharyaCRBishopKHarrisBRaburnDMuasherSJFreezing of all embryos in in vitro fertilization is beneficial in high responders, but not intermediate and low responders: an analysis of 82,935 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registryFertil Steril201811058807Search in Google Scholar