The interaction of female age and active male smoking has negative influence on success rates of the in vitro fertilization treatments

1Fims S, Cruzat VF, Keane KN, Joesbury KA, Lee AH, Newsholme P, et al. The effect of cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption and fruit and vegetable consumption on IVF outcomes: A review and presentation of original data. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015; 13: 134.FimsSCruzatVFKeaneKNJoesburyKALeeAHNewsholmePet alThe effect of cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption and fruit and vegetable consumption on IVF outcomes: A review and presentation of original dataReprod Biol Endocrinol20151313410.1186/s12958-015-0133-x468115026669322Search in Google Scholar

2Oliveira H, Spanò M, Santos C, Pereira Mde L. Adverse effects of cadmium exposure on mouse sperm. Reprod Toxicol. 2009; 28(4): 550-555.OliveiraHSpanòMSantosCPereira MdeLAdverse effects of cadmium exposure on mouse spermReprod Toxicol200928455055510.1016/j.reprotox.2009.08.00119695322Search in Google Scholar

3Lanzafame M, La Vignera S, Vicari E, Calogero AE. Oxidative stress and medical antioxidant treatment in male infertility. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009; 19(5): 638-659.LanzafameMLa VigneraSVicariECalogeroAEOxidative stress and medical antioxidant treatment in male infertilityReprod Biomed Online200919563865910.1016/j.rbmo.2009.09.01420021713Search in Google Scholar

4Harlev A, Agarwal A, Gunes SO, Shetty A, du Plessis SS. Smoking and male infertility: An evidence-based review. World J Mens Health. 2015; 33(3): 143-160.HarlevAAgarwalAGunesSOShettyAdu PlessisSSSmoking and male infertility: An evidence-based reviewWorld J Mens Health201533314316010.5534/wjmh.2015.33.3.143470943026770934Search in Google Scholar

5Agarwal A, Virg G, Ong C, du Plessis SS. Effect of oxidative stress on male reproduction. World J Mens Health. 2014; 32(1): 1-17.AgarwalAVirgGOngCdu PlessisSSEffect of oxidative stress on male reproductionWorld J Mens Health201432111710.5534/wjmh.2014.32.1.1402622924872947Search in Google Scholar

6Dechanet C, Anahory T, Daude JC, Quantin X, Reyftmann L, Hamamah S, et al. Effects of cigarette smoking on reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17(1): 76-95.DechanetCAnahoryTDaudeJCQuantinXReyftmannLHamamahSet alEffects of cigarette smoking on reproductionHum Reprod Update2011171769510.1093/humupd/dmq03320685716Search in Google Scholar

7Chen SJ, Allam JP, Duan YG, Haidl G. Influence of reactive oxygen species on human sperm functions and fertilizing capacity including therapeutical approaches. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013; 288(1): 191-199.ChenSJAllamJPDuanYGHaidlGInfluence of reactive oxygen species on human sperm functions and fertilizing capacity including therapeutical approachesArch Gynecol Obstet2013288119119910.1007/s00404-013-2801-423543240Search in Google Scholar

8Liu Y, Gold EB, Lasley BL, Johnson WO. Factors affecting menstrual cycle characteristics. Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 160(2): 131-140.LiuYGoldEBLasleyBLJohnsonWOFactors affecting menstrual cycle characteristicsAm J Epidemiol2004160213114010.1093/aje/kwh18815234934Search in Google Scholar

9Freour T, Masson D, Dessolle L, Allaoua D, Dejoie T, Mirallie S. Ovarian reserve and in vitro fertilization cycles outcome according to women smoking status and stimulation regimen. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012; 285(4): 1177-1178.FreourTMassonDDessolleLAllaouaDDejoieTMirallieSOvarian reserve and in vitro fertilization cycles outcome according to women smoking status and stimulation regimenArch Gynecol Obstet201228541177117810.1007/s00404-011-2172-722183426Search in Google Scholar

10Ferraretti A, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L. ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(7): 1616-1624.FerrarettiALa MarcaAFauserBCTarlatzisBNargundGGianaroliLESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteriaHum Reprod20112671616162410.1093/humrep/der09221505041Search in Google Scholar

11Alviqqi C, Humaidan P, Howles CM, Tredway D, Hillier SG. Biological versus chronological ovarian age: Implications for assisted reproduction technology. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009; 7: 101.AlviqqiCHumaidanPHowlesCMTredwayDHillierSGBiological versus chronological ovarian age: Implications for assisted reproduction technologyReprod Biol Endocrinol2009710110.1186/1477-7827-7-101276470919772632Search in Google Scholar

12Jehan S, Syed S. Association of ovarian reserve with age, BMI and serum FSH level in subfertile women. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016; 66(4): 409-413.JehanSSyedSAssociation of ovarian reserve with age, BMI and serum FSH level in subfertile womenJ Pak Med Assoc2016664409413Search in Google Scholar

13Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendricks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2006; 12(6): 685-718.BroekmansFJKweeJHendricksDJMolBWLambalkCBA systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcomeHum Reprod Update200612668571810.1093/humupd/dml03416891297Search in Google Scholar

14Petanovski Z, Dimitrov G, Ajdin B, Hadzi-Lega M, Sotirovska V, Matevski V, et al. Impact of body mass index (BMI) and age on the outcome of the IVF process. Prilozi. 2011; 32(1): 155-171.PetanovskiZDimitrovGAjdinBHadzi-LegaMSotirovskaVMatevskiVet alImpact of body mass index (BMI) and age on the outcome of the IVF processPrilozi2011321155171Search in Google Scholar

15Gardner DK, Lane M. Culture systems for the human embryo. In: Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howies CM, Shoham Z, Editors. Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives, 3rd ed. London, UK: Informa UK Ltd. 2009: 88-89.GardnerDKLaneMCulture systems for the human embryoGardnerDKWeissmanAHowiesCMShohamZTextbook of Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives, 3rd edLondon, UKInforma UK Ltd20098889Search in Google Scholar

16WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, 5th ed. World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press, 2010.WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, 5th ed. World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and ResearchGeneva, SwitzerlandWHO Press2010Search in Google Scholar

17Hardarson T, Van Landuy L, Jones G. The blastocyst. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(Suppl 1): i72-i91.HardarsonTVan LanduyLJonesGThe blastocystHum Reprod201227Suppl 1i72i9110.1093/humrep/des23022763375Search in Google Scholar

18Sotiroska V, Petanovski Z, Dimitrov Gl, Hadji-Lega M, Shushleski D, Saltirovski S, et al. The day of embryo transfer affects delivery rate, birth weights, female-to-male ratio, and monozygotic twin rate. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 54(6): 716-721.SotiroskaVPetanovskiZDimitrovGlHadji-LegaMShushleskiDSaltirovskiSet alThe day of embryo transfer affects delivery rate, birth weights, female-to-male ratio, and monozygotic twin rateTaiwan J Obstet Gynecol201554671672110.1016/j.tjog.2015.06.01126700991Search in Google Scholar

19Joesbury KA, Edirisinghe WR, Phillips MR, Yovich JL. Evidence that male smoking affects the likelihood of a pregnancy following IVF treatment: Application of the modified cumulative embryo score. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13(6): 1506-1513.JoesburyKAEdirisingheWRPhillipsMRYovichJLEvidence that male smoking affects the likelihood of a pregnancy following IVF treatment: Application of the modified cumulative embryo scoreHum Reprod19981361506151310.1093/humrep/13.6.15069688383Search in Google Scholar

20Klonoff-Cohen H. Female and male lifestyle habits and IVF: What is known and unknown. Hum Reprod Update. 2005; 11(2): 179-203.Klonoff-CohenH.Female and male lifestyle habits and IVF: What is known and unknownHum Reprod Update200511217920310.1093/humupd/dmh05915708968Search in Google Scholar

21Neal DT, Wood W, Quinn J.M. Habits: A repeat performance. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2006; 15(4): 198-202.NealDTWoodWQuinnJ.MHabits: A repeat performanceCurr Dir Psychol Sci200615419820210.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00435.xSearch in Google Scholar

22Kapawa A, Giannakis D, Tsoukanelis K, Kanakas N, Baltogiannis D, Agapitos E, et al. Effects of paternal cigarette smoking on testicular function, sperm fertilizing capacity, embryonic development, and blastocyst capacity for implantation in rats. Andrologia. 2004; 36(2): 57-68.KapawaAGiannakisDTsoukanelisKKanakasNBaltogiannisDAgapitosEet alEffects of paternal cigarette smoking on testicular function, sperm fertilizing capacity, embryonic development, and blastocyst capacity for implantation in ratsAndrologia2004362576810.1111/j.1439-0272.2004.00605.x15084151Search in Google Scholar

23Pellestor F, Andréo B, Amal F, Humeau C, Demaille J. Maternal aging and chromosomal abnormalities: New data drawn from in vitro unfertilized human oocytes. Hum Genet. 2003; 112(2): 195-203.PellestorFAndréoBAmalFHumeauCDemailleJMaternal aging and chromosomal abnormalities: New data drawn from in vitro unfertilized human oocytesHum Genet2003112219520310.1007/s00439-002-0852-x12522562Search in Google Scholar

24Gunby J, Bissonnette F, Librach C, Cowan L. IVF Directors Group of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2007 results from the Canadian ART Register. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95(2): 542-547.GunbyJBissonnetteFLibrachCCowanLIVF Directors Group of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2007 results from the Canadian ART RegisterFertil Steril201195254254710.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.05720656287Search in Google Scholar

25Twigg JP, Irvine DS, Aitken RJ. Oxidative damage to DNA in human spermatozoa does not preclude pronucleus formation at intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13(7): 1864-1871.TwiggJPIrvineDSAitkenRJOxidative damage to DNA in human spermatozoa does not preclude pronucleus formation at intracytoplasmic sperm injectionHum Reprod19981371864187110.1093/humrep/13.7.18649740440Search in Google Scholar

26Genesca A, Caballin MR, Miro R, Benet J, Germà JR, Egozcue J. Repair of human sperm chromosome aberrations in the hamster egg. Hum Genet. 1992; 89(2): 181-186.GenescaACaballinMRMiroRBenetJGermàJREgozcueJRepair of human sperm chromosome aberrations in the hamster eggHum Genet199289218118610.1007/BF002171201587529Search in Google Scholar

27Ahmadi A, Ng SC. Developmental capacity of damaged spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(9): 2279-2285.AhmadiANgSCDevelopmental capacity of damaged spermatozoaHum Reprod19991492279228510.1093/humrep/14.9.227910469696Search in Google Scholar

28Seli E, Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, Moffat O, Sakkas D. Extent of nuclear DNA damage in ejaculated spermatozoa impacts on blastocyst development after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2004; 82(2): 378-383.SeliEGardnerDKSchoolcraftWBMoffatOSakkasDExtent of nuclear DNA damage in ejaculated spermatozoa impacts on blastocyst development after in vitro fertilizationFertil Steril200482237838310.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.12.03915302287Search in Google Scholar

29Neal MS, Hughes EG, Holloway AC, Foster WG. Sidestream smoking is equally as damaging as main-stream smoking on IVF outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2005; 20(9): 2531-2535.NealMSHughesEGHollowayACFosterWGSidestream smoking is equally as damaging as main-stream smoking on IVF outcomesHum Reprod20052092531253510.1093/humrep/dei08015919779Search in Google Scholar

30Marchetti F, Essers J, Kanaar R, Wrobek AJ. Disruption of maternal DNA repair increases sperm derived chromosomal aberrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007; 104(45): 17725-17729.MarchettiFEssersJKanaarRWrobekAJDisruption of maternal DNA repair increases sperm derived chromosomal aberrationsProc Natl Acad Sci USA200710445177251772910.1073/pnas.0705257104207704617978187Search in Google Scholar